Re: Elections 2012 -- Carrion My Wayward Son!
when you have [people I dislike] calling any moderate GOPer a RINO and trying to primary them as not being conservative enough, why the fark should I support them? For fark's sake, Reagan and Nixon wouldn't be conservative enough for the Tea Party if they actually looked at their policies.
I hope you don't mind if I don't accept anything you say about the TEA Party as authoritative, I'd be surprised if you ever actually had a reasonable conversation with a member and your knowledge is entirely derived from media <strike>propaganda</strike> articles and stories.
From what I've seen and heard, it is not "moderate" Republicans who are being "targeted" because of their "moderation," it is either (a) career lifers who have lost contact with the people of their state (Lugar reportedly spent more time in Washington than in Indiana), or (b) pork lovers who just don't realize that we need to focus government spending on greater efficiency and efficacy. We really don't need to spend as much as we do because government overhead relative to government output is way too high.
I don't have the statistics at my fingertips, but the number of people in government delivering services has grown relative to the population being served, yet individual productivity through improved technology also should be growing. Translation from business-speak to English: more people working less effectively compared to value delivered.
Yes, there is a great deal of substantial value to be delivered by government. The "true" debate is not over "whether" but over "appropriate proportions." Every time a person says "do we have too much?" or "what is the right balance for our times?", the response from the left is wailing and gnashing of teeth and accusations of "starve the children and deprive everyone of healthcare" when that was never proposed to begin with.
If you haven't watched Blumenthal try to answer "how do we create jobs?" I suggest you do: it is very instructive of a mindset.
Once upon a time, reasonable people could accept differences of opinion as legitimate; I'm not sure when any deviation from orthodoxy became such a heinous crime, but the demonization of any difference into pure unadulterated evil and imputation of base motives has really made conversation difficult and compromise almost impossible.