What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Cops: No Snarky Nor Positive Title

Status
Not open for further replies.
Just because they wear a badge and a gun doesn't mean we shouldn't be shooting back. I am sick of this country. I am sick of what we are tolerating. The cops can shoot hundreds or thousands of people and we're supposed to believe that the vast majority are justified? Fvck that. The vast majority are UN-justified and most of them are actually murders. WHEN ARE WE GOING TO FIGHT BACK? The right wing is waging war on real Americans and the police are their front line soldiers. We need to begin fighting back and we need to do it a lot more forcefully than we have been doing it.
 
“"It says cops are 'mean to black people,' or 'shot them because they are black,' or police officers 'stick up for each other' to help police officers get away with doing bad things," it continues.”

...what’s the issue? Didn’t this union endorse trump and now they’re worried about fear and hatred?? AYFKM. And of course they’re running to walz so they can call him hitler if he doesn’t bend to them

https://bringmethenews.com/minnesot...FQW3mTGl6LvvhJxnNfihEj8IH6zYWdENMRmYteYDuwIc8
 
"Language in this book leaves the impression unchecked that police officers routinely pull over, arrest, and kill black people without consequences," the letter from MPPOA executive director Brian Peters reads.
Click to expand...

So, non-fiction?
 
state of hockey said:
Wonderful opportunity to respond with a simple “F@$! your feelings.”
Click to expand...

"F-ck your feelings" has always meant "F-ck your non-white and/or female feelings."

RtoeYjUqrO6wy4YymQEZlN5cGfiGrwKlN3k1m8D2BCI.jpg
 
Uh....

”Colorado police officer Jason Taft has been placed on leave after sharing a post on Facebook threatening Democrats and supporters of Democratic nominee Joe Biden.

“If for some reason we lose do we get to be little *****es and beat the hell out of the other party like they did," Taft wrote. “I’m ready to leave my job just so I can hurt these people that act like they know what real life is about. They are a bunch of time out in the corner billy people. They have no clue of the true rath thats coming. Dems you thought you made a scene or statement with BLM just wait this it will be fun."

paid leave I’m sure

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...eIkpdIF3UxQqmVRH0IJiWCO_yxVhLMEuZ4sQTujDUptKw
 
Deutsche Gopher Fan said:
Uh....

”Colorado police officer Jason Taft has been placed on leave after sharing a post on Facebook threatening Democrats and supporters of Democratic nominee Joe Biden.

“If for some reason we lose do we get to be little *****es and beat the hell out of the other party like they did," Taft wrote. “I’m ready to leave my job just so I can hurt these people that act like they know what real life is about. They are a bunch of time out in the corner billy people. They have no clue of the true rath thats coming. Dems you thought you made a scene or statement with BLM just wait this it will be fun."

paid leave I’m sure

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brie...eIkpdIF3UxQqmVRH0IJiWCO_yxVhLMEuZ4sQTujDUptKw
Click to expand...

In our world, freedom of speech rules. Only this word should coincide with the opinion of those in power. If it doesn't match, expect trouble. At best, under the guise of being fired, and at worst, dragged to court.
 
Do I have to put someone on ignore after just three posts? That would be a record. In our world freedom of speech has never allowed that "fighting words" or incitements to violence were protected speech. Learn a little history and try harder to understand the constitution.
 
WeAreNDHockey said:
Do I have to put someone on ignore after just three posts? That would be a record. In our world freedom of speech has never allowed that "fighting words" or incitements to violence were protected speech. Learn a little history and try harder to understand the constitution.
Click to expand...

I think 007 may be a bot.
 
In other news, the trial judge in the case involving the George Floyd cops made a pretty significant ruling. First, he determined the four should be tried together. I don't think that's a huge surprise, and honestly, I don't know if that's good for the defense or good for the prosecution. I know the defense contested it so they must think it's bad for them.

More significantly, the judge ruled the trial will be livestreamed. In Minnesota, this is pretty significant. Minnesota has been probably one of the most restrictive states in terms of keeping cameras out of the courtrooms, so to livestream a case is a pretty big step. The judge basically determined that public interest, the right of the defendants to have the public see that they are not getting railroaded, and the social distancing issues caused by the pandemic requires this big step.

The defense was all in favor of cameras covering this trial (are they thinking OJ case?) but Attorney General Keith Ellison was very much opposed to it. It'll be interesting to see if he appeals that part of the decision.
 
SJHovey said:
In other news, the trial judge in the case involving the George Floyd cops made a pretty significant ruling. First, he determined the four should be tried together. I don't think that's a huge surprise, and honestly, I don't know if that's good for the defense or good for the prosecution. I know the defense contested it so they must think it's bad for them.

More significantly, the judge ruled the trial will be livestreamed. In Minnesota, this is pretty significant. Minnesota has been probably one of the most restrictive states in terms of keeping cameras out of the courtrooms, so to livestream a case is a pretty big step. The judge basically determined that public interest, the right of the defendants to have the public see that they are not getting railroaded, and the social distancing issues caused by the pandemic requires this big step.

The defense was all in favor of cameras covering this trial (are they thinking OJ case?) but Attorney General Keith Ellison was very much opposed to it. It'll be interesting to see if he appeals that part of the decision.
Click to expand...

I dont think he will because he likely wont win. Plus the other parts of the ruling are so in his favor that it would be rather dumb. He will bloviate a bit about it but I doubt he puts much effort into an appeal even if he files one.

When I heard the judge ruled this way I got worried because change of venue can be a reversible error. When I read it though [and here is me again saying I am no expert I am going by my basic education and what I have heard from people way smarter than me on the subject] I think he covered his bases quite well. There is no part of this state that hasn't been influenced by what happened, where they havent seen the video, havent had protests and so on. Plus there will be no security issues in Hennepin County. Bowing to pressure and moving this somewhere else would create more issues than it would solve.

Having all 4 cops together in one trial just backs up my belief that at least 2 will take a deal.
 
Serve and protect.

Louisville Metro Police concealed at least 738,000 records documenting the sexual abuse of Explorer Scouts by two officers — then lied to keep the files from the public, records show.

The Courier Journal last year requested all records regarding sexual abuse of minors by two officers in the Explorer Scout program for youths interested in law enforcement careers.

Police officials and the Jefferson County Attorney’s Office said they couldn't comply, insisting all the records had been turned over to the FBI for its investigation.

But that wasn't true, according to records The Courier Journal recently obtained in the appeal of its open records case.

In fact, the department still had at least 738,000 records, which the city allowed to be deleted.
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top