USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
- Status
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
I saw a number of tweets about this. Did he say Florida has no chance to come back, or did he really think the fourth quarter had just ended?
bronconick
Yep, still here
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
God, I can't believe I'm defending Holtz, but I think he may be referring to Florida's 9 minutes of possession, 2 first downs, 51 yards, and zero points outside of the opening kickoff return.
No one tell him, because I don't want him spitting in my direction.
God, I can't believe I'm defending Holtz, but I think he may be referring to Florida's 9 minutes of possession, 2 first downs, 51 yards, and zero points outside of the opening kickoff return.
No one tell him, because I don't want him spitting in my direction.
MountieBoyOz
Eater of Worlds
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
Hence why everyone wants Bama to kill them in Tuscaloosa to create BCS anarchy and take them down a peg.
Hence why everyone wants Bama to kill them in Tuscaloosa to create BCS anarchy and take them down a peg.
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
I wonder if the hostilities by Auburn wasn't caused by all the potshots being taken on an Auburn player while he was on the ground? No excuse for sure, but I thought the refs were very nice to Georgia.
In other news, struggling financially, Michigan's State Senate was very frugal in the use of taxpayer money by renaming a stretch of Michigan highway after Mark Ingram.
If I were a taxpayer in Michigan, I'd be apalled. Certainly the Senate has better things to do?
I wonder if the hostilities by Auburn wasn't caused by all the potshots being taken on an Auburn player while he was on the ground? No excuse for sure, but I thought the refs were very nice to Georgia.
In other news, struggling financially, Michigan's State Senate was very frugal in the use of taxpayer money by renaming a stretch of Michigan highway after Mark Ingram.
If I were a taxpayer in Michigan, I'd be apalled. Certainly the Senate has better things to do?
Terrierbyassociation
Fight Cancer, Wherever You Find It
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
Oregon leads Cal 15-13 and Cal has the ball deep in Oregon territory.
Oregon leads Cal 15-13 and Cal has the ball deep in Oregon territory.
WeWantMore
New member
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
I know it's a tough angle and all that, by that is an inexcusable miss.
I know it's a tough angle and all that, by that is an inexcusable miss.
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
That game and the Iowa-Northwestern games both had fun endings to watch- great games today in the B10. Too bad the wheels came off of Penn State's effort- that could have been fun, too...
Oh and stop the presses, Minnesota (2-9) won and ended their 9 game losing streak. That's 2 wins, both on the road.
That game and the Iowa-Northwestern games both had fun endings to watch- great games today in the B10. Too bad the wheels came off of Penn State's effort- that could have been fun, too...
bronconick
Yep, still here
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
Hopkins redeems himself from his 40 yard miss with 7 seconds last week with a 55 yarder that would have gone from 65 or 70 to beat Clemson 16-13.
Hopkins redeems himself from his 40 yard miss with 7 seconds last week with a 55 yarder that would have gone from 65 or 70 to beat Clemson 16-13.
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
Illinois got Zooked again with ****-poor end-game time management. Minnesota is inside the 10 yard line, with two timeouts, and no longer has Tim Brewster as coach. The odds of them running out of time before they run out of downs is 0.00%. Instead of using timeouts to preserve a little bit of time for a final drive, Illinois ran out of time on their final possession while still having a couple timeouts in their pocket. And as it turns out, you don't actually get points for having timeouts remaining when time expires.
Illinois got Zooked again with ****-poor end-game time management. Minnesota is inside the 10 yard line, with two timeouts, and no longer has Tim Brewster as coach. The odds of them running out of time before they run out of downs is 0.00%. Instead of using timeouts to preserve a little bit of time for a final drive, Illinois ran out of time on their final possession while still having a couple timeouts in their pocket. And as it turns out, you don't actually get points for having timeouts remaining when time expires.
WeWantMore
New member
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
Those are all decent, I was wondering if they might go with Harvard-Yale though, just for a change of pace.
Those are all decent, I was wondering if they might go with Harvard-Yale though, just for a change of pace.
P
Priceless
Guest
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
The ABC primetime games suck. FSU @ Maryland, USC @ Ore State. Ohio State is at Iowa, but the Hawkeyes' loss diminishes their game. ESPN might go to NYC for Notre Dame vs Army.
The ABC primetime games suck. FSU @ Maryland, USC @ Ore State. Ohio State is at Iowa, but the Hawkeyes' loss diminishes their game. ESPN might go to NYC for Notre Dame vs Army.
Dirty
#BanBiddy
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
Ha! Yeah, right. That would be totally awesome, but it won't happen.
Ha! Yeah, right. That would be totally awesome, but it won't happen.
WeWantMore
New member
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
Well, I was sort of right. They did go for something off the board, but they're going to Wrigley Field for Illinois-Northwestern.
Well, I was sort of right. They did go for something off the board, but they're going to Wrigley Field for Illinois-Northwestern.
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
didn't realize it was being played at wrigley field...that's kinda cool actually
didn't realize it was being played at wrigley field...that's kinda cool actually
RaceBoarder
Waiting for the Snow to fly...
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
Holy crap.... I might try and go down there for that...
Holy crap.... I might try and go down there for that...
WeWantMore
New member
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
Yep. Field barely fits.
http://www.laketheposts.com/index.php/2010/11/say-wrigley/
Yep. Field barely fits.
http://www.laketheposts.com/index.php/2010/11/say-wrigley/
Re: College Football III: We may lose, but we keep the score close!
eh, its different alright.
And a halftime score from the UMD-Mankato game that got bumped to today due to snow, 14-13 Mankato in Marshall. UMD seems to be playing a bit tight, and just havent put it in the endzone like they should today. And Mankato should invest in a tarp!
Yeah, Harvard-Yale would have been pretty good.
eh, its different alright.
And a halftime score from the UMD-Mankato game that got bumped to today due to snow, 14-13 Mankato in Marshall. UMD seems to be playing a bit tight, and just havent put it in the endzone like they should today. And Mankato should invest in a tarp!
- Status