What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

3M has announced that as of today, 100% of all electricity powering its HQ is wind-based. The HQ is home to >12,000 people. The company also set goals of of 50% renewable energy for its global operations by 2025 and 100% by 2050.

https://news.3m.com/stories/flipping-the-switch-to-100-percent-renewable-electricity-at-3m

Yes, they've bought the renewable resources to make that claim.

But, when the sun doesn't shine and the wind is calm (and without storage tech) their campus will be powered by the Monticello nuclear facility or the Great River Energy coal fired plant at Underwood, ND, like the rest of MSP.

It's honorable goal setting; it's awesome virtue signalling; but, 3M is dependent upon baseline load carrying facilities until we have storage tech figured out.
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

Yes, they've bought the renewable resources to make that claim.

But, when the sun doesn't shine and the wind is calm (and without storage tech) their campus will be powered by the Monticello nuclear facility or the Great River Energy coal fired plant at Underwood, ND, like the rest of MSP.

It's honorable goal setting; it's awesome virtue signalling; but, 3M is dependent upon baseline load carrying facilities until we have storage tech figured out.

Aaah, yes, Captain Cold Water is here.
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

Viable as a method of carbon capture, not as a fuel.

Better than nothing.
If it's solidified it could be reclaimed in restoration of where the original coal came from (unless the liquefied metal process makes that untenable or unviable).
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

Better than nothing.
If it's solidified it could be reclaimed in restoration of where the original coal came from (unless the liquefied metal process makes that untenable or unviable).

It's perfect actually:

1. Burn coal for energy.
2. Pipe the CO2 into a facility where it's turned back into coal.
3. Go back to step 1.

Renewable coal!
 
Last edited:
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

virtue signalling

This is the most useful expression ever created because as soon as somebody uses it you can just put them on Ignore forever, they're an as-swipe.

Seriously, language is a conveyor of meaning and boy does that expression convey meaning.
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

It's perfect actually:

1. Burn coal for energy.
2. Pipe the CO2 into a facility where it's turned back into coal.
3. Go back to step 1.

Renewable coal!

Didn't you already say the resultant post-combustion is no longer viable as fuel.
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

This is the most useful expression ever created because as soon as somebody uses it you can just put them on Ignore forever, they're an as-swipe.

Seriously, language is a conveyor of meaning and boy does that expression convey meaning.

Would calling it self-aggrandizing claims of a dubious nature make it better?

They are trying to illustrate and make prominent their purity and goodwill toward the environment (even when it is easy to show there are still shortcomings). They are signalling their purported virtue.
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

Shorter Sic: I know empathy is just a con. No, I don't think I'm a sociopath, why?
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

Would calling it self-aggrandizing claims of a dubious nature make it better?

They are trying to illustrate and make prominent their purity and goodwill toward the environment (even when it is easy to show there are still shortcomings). They are signalling their purported virtue.

Do you strive to be this dumb or does it come naturally?
 
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

Didn't you already say the resultant post-combustion is no longer viable as fuel.

That's not what I meant. I meant that having the technology to turn CO2 into coal doesn't mean that emitting CO2 for energy is no longer a problem.
 
Last edited:
Re: Climate Change 2: Thank God for Global Warming

This is the most useful expression ever created because as soon as somebody uses it you can just put them on Ignore forever, they're an as-swipe.

Seriously, language is a conveyor of meaning and boy does that expression convey meaning.

That and "SJW". You'd think "Social Justice" is a positive thing, but you'd be wrong, because 30 year old virgins on reddit use it as an insult.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top