JohnsonsJerseys
Michigan Tech Fan
Re: CCHA teams will join WCHA
Yes, I understand that the WCHA does not look good to BGSU given their location. My only question was why did they wait until this point to try and save the CCHA? Trust me, I'm pro-WCHA but I would have been happy to see the CCHA stay around with 5 or 6 teams and the same for the WCHA. Northern and LSSU were reasonable adds to the WCHA. They were strong regional rivals with limited travel costs (for MTU). But to simply make a blind grab for every CCHA team left and disolve the conference is not in the best interest of college hockey. I've made several posts about this in other threads. If all the teams out there are so concerned about the future of college hockey, why are we talking about finding a conference home for teams that don't even exist (MN M-head, Buffalo, etc) and UAH still sits in the weeds all but begging for a conference to play hockey for their already established team and obviously die-hard desire to stay on the D-I map?
I have no problem with BGSU doing what is in their best interest. Heck this is all most everyone has done through this entire process. I'm just saying the timing is too late in the game now unless the plan is to take this conference jumping plague to the East and start breaking the AHA, ECAC and HE apart as well so there are more teams in the conference blender. If that happens, then I say we all just meet at center ice, throw out teams' stick in the pile and let the NCAA sort them into piles and then we go play hockey. It would make almost as much sense as some of what has already happened to this point.
Ryan J
Really? And what are the alternatives for BGSU? WCHA is obviously not their preference...
Yes, I understand that the WCHA does not look good to BGSU given their location. My only question was why did they wait until this point to try and save the CCHA? Trust me, I'm pro-WCHA but I would have been happy to see the CCHA stay around with 5 or 6 teams and the same for the WCHA. Northern and LSSU were reasonable adds to the WCHA. They were strong regional rivals with limited travel costs (for MTU). But to simply make a blind grab for every CCHA team left and disolve the conference is not in the best interest of college hockey. I've made several posts about this in other threads. If all the teams out there are so concerned about the future of college hockey, why are we talking about finding a conference home for teams that don't even exist (MN M-head, Buffalo, etc) and UAH still sits in the weeds all but begging for a conference to play hockey for their already established team and obviously die-hard desire to stay on the D-I map?
I have no problem with BGSU doing what is in their best interest. Heck this is all most everyone has done through this entire process. I'm just saying the timing is too late in the game now unless the plan is to take this conference jumping plague to the East and start breaking the AHA, ECAC and HE apart as well so there are more teams in the conference blender. If that happens, then I say we all just meet at center ice, throw out teams' stick in the pile and let the NCAA sort them into piles and then we go play hockey. It would make almost as much sense as some of what has already happened to this point.
Ryan J