LOL
LOL
They have two Hispanics running. This is as good as it gets for them.
There's still a theory that maximizing the white vote will bring victory. If the voters are roughly 70% white / 30% non-white, and you hit 65% of the white vote, you can afford to lose 80% of the non-white vote and still win.
Two problems with this theory are that 65% of white vote would outdo even Reagan in '84 and 30% non-white is expected to keep growing.
There's also the issue of white voters aren't all voting the same in all states (a key miscalculation of the Romney campaign). Appalachian and Southern whites gave Obama like 10% of the vote, but IIRC he won the majority of whites in places like NH, MA, MN, IA, MI and perhaps PA.
There's still a theory that maximizing the white vote will bring victory. If the voters are roughly 70% white / 30% non-white, and you hit 65% of the white vote, you can afford to lose 80% of the non-white vote and still win.
Two problems with this theory are that 65% of white vote would outdo even Reagan in '84 and 30% non-white is expected to keep growing.
There's also the issue of white voters aren't all voting the same in all states (a key miscalculation of the Romney campaign). Appalachian and Southern whites gave Obama like 10% of the vote, but IIRC he won the majority of whites in places like NH, MA, MN, IA, MI and perhaps PA.
There's also the issue of white voters aren't all voting the same in all states (a key miscalculation of the Romney campaign). Appalachian and Southern whites gave Obama like 10% of the vote, but IIRC he won the majority of whites in places like NH, MA, MN, IA, MI and perhaps PA.
Obama won the majority of whites in NH, ME, VT, MA, CT, RI, NY, HI
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/10/1159759/-Percent-of-White-vote-won-by-Obama-2012-by-state
That is an awesome table. Thanks.
Right color, wrong flavor.
I love the column headings.
"I support Black Obama, but not Other Obama, and certainly not White Obama."![]()
That is an awesome table. Thanks.
That is an awesome table. Thanks.
One question is whether there are numbers of any significance of whites who will vote for Clinton but who would not vote for Obama. I'm tempted to say that anybody who won't vote for a candidate primarily because they're black is already GOP, but there may still be a few old guard Dixiecrats who never got the memo to switch parties in the 70s.
But Clinton could certainly appeal to Cold War liberals who distrusted Obama's foreign policy credentials.
Yeah, that's what I was thinking. She might do better with whites in the South particularly with the older voters in Florida. Maybe in the old industrial places like PA or OH. Otherwise whether she goes from 10 to 12% in Mississippi is sorta irrelevant in the big picture of things...
In VA or NC it might matter, but if that's the battle line we've already won.
Let's be pessimists and assume a Cuban on the ticket (which happens unless Jeb wins the nomination) means FL goes red. That gets the GOP to 235 EV, 35 short. VA is another sine qua non, that's 13 for 248, 22 short. Which leaves:
OH 18
IA 6
NV 6
NH 4
So OH is also essential, and OH may be Hillary's best bet to lock down those gritty ConservaDems who have been wavering and are always threatening to bolt to the GOP.
Maybe Kasich/Rubio is their best bet. The Tea Party won't like it but Clinton Derangement Syndrome is so strong among them that they'll come out just to punish her.
Problem for the GOP generally is a spread out field. Think of it like playing Space Invaders on the old Atari system or in the arcade back when we were kids. Tough to hit the target when they're on either side of the screen instead of bunched up in the middle. GOP ticket needs to shore up South (VA, NC, FL), win in the rust belt (OH crucially) and then also go out west (CO, NV) plus maybe the Northeast (NH) or Midwest (IA) to give a cushion just in case. You can pick a Southerner (Cruz, Rubio, Jebbers!) or a Ohioan (Kasich) but that does nothing for you out west. You can put Sandoval from NV on the ticket but then there's no Rust Belt or Southern presence. Its an interesting calculation to be sure, which is why Trump oddly enough would be the best bet if he wasn't nuts. A guy not rooted in one particular region.
Jeb isn't rooted in a region, either. But Jeb makes John Kerry look dynamic and Al Gore look charismatic.
I just don't see anybody but Trump or Cruz being the nominee. My money's on Cruz personally. IMHO speculating on Kasich is like if we speculated on how well Huntsman would do if he was the GOP nominee.
Jeb isn't rooted in a region, either. But Jeb makes John Kerry look dynamic and Al Gore look charismatic.