Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XIII: Clinton destrueretur est. Trump est destruetur. Vox Pop
Check out the county map.
Check out the county map.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Campaign 2016 Part XIII: Clinton destrueretur est. Trump est destruetur. Vox Populi!
- Thread starter joecct
- Start date
- Status
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XIII: Clinton destrueretur est. Trump est destruetur. Vox Pop
"In the South, they don't care how close you get as long as you don't get too big.
In the North, they don't care how big you get as long as you don't get too close."
"In the South, they don't care how close you get as long as you don't get too big.
In the North, they don't care how big you get as long as you don't get too close."
Last edited:
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XIII: Clinton destrueretur est. Trump est destruetur. Vox Pop
Wendell Wilkie comes to mind. Inexperienced candidate from business background nominated during dangerous times (1940) by GOP over more Establishment figures.
Wendell Wilkie comes to mind. Inexperienced candidate from business background nominated during dangerous times (1940) by GOP over more Establishment figures.
Kepler
Si certus es dubita
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XIII: Clinton destrueretur est. Trump est destruetur. Vox Pop
Trumps spokesperson triangulates anti-immigrant racism to troll anti-black racism. Very impressive.
I'm not sure how you respond to derp that deep, though this is a start.
Trumps spokesperson triangulates anti-immigrant racism to troll anti-black racism. Very impressive.
I'm not sure how you respond to derp that deep, though this is a start.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XIII: Clinton destrueretur est. Trump est destruetur. Vox Pop
that may be over the mountain asinine... not sure where the border was crossed
that may be over the mountain asinine... not sure where the border was crossed
walrus
Wind up workin' in a gas station
He is selling out right now on tv. I'm sure the Clinton foundation is lining his pockets
Yes we did. And some would argue that, at least education wise, they have suffered for it by well meaning but patronizing educators.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XIII: Clinton destrueretur est. Trump est destruetur. Vox Pop
Looks like Sanders is hitting it out of the park in his Hillary endorsement. Good for him, and with this goes the lest shred of hope for the Trump campaign of winning this election. Way to go Bernie. I personally wasn't sure he had it in him in all honesty, but happy to be proven wrong for once.
Looks like Sanders is hitting it out of the park in his Hillary endorsement. Good for him, and with this goes the lest shred of hope for the Trump campaign of winning this election. Way to go Bernie. I personally wasn't sure he had it in him in all honesty, but happy to be proven wrong for once.
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XIII: Clinton destrueretur est. Trump est destruetur. Vox Pop
Eight Justices in Plessy would, at least. But not one (from website, not decision itself):
It was said in argument that the statute of Louisiana does not discriminate against either race but prescribes a rule applicable alike to white and colored citizens. But this argument does not meet the difficulty. Everyone knows that the statues in question had its origin in the purpose, not so much to exclude white persons from railroad cars occupied by blacks, as to exclude colored people from coaches occupied by or assigned to white persons. Railroad corporations of Louisiana did not make discrimination among whites in the matter of accommodation for travellers. The thing to accomplish was, under the guise of giving equal accommodations for whites and blacks, to compel the latter to keep to themselves while travelling in railroad passenger coaches. No one would be so wanting in candor as to assert the contrary. The fundamental objection, therefore, to the statues is that it interferes with the personal freedom of citizens....If a white man and a black man choose to occupy the same public conveyance on a public highway, it is their right to do so, and no government, proceeding alone on grounds of race, can prevent it without infringing the personal liberty of each....
The white race deems itself to be the dominant race in this country. And so it is, in prestige, in achievements, in education, in wealth, and in power. So, I doubt not, it will continue to be for all time, if it remains true to its great heritage and holds fast to the principles of constitutional liberty. But in the view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution in color-blind and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law. The humblest is the peer of the most powerful. The law regards man as man and takes no account of his surroundings or of his color when his civil rights as guaranteed by the supreme law of the land are involved....
The arbitrary separation of citizens, on the basis of race, while they are on a public highway, is a badge of servitude wholly inconsistent with the civil freedom and the equality before the law established by the Constitution. It cannot be justified upon any legal grounds
If evils will result from the commingling of the two races upon public highways established for the benefit of all, they will infinitely less than those that will surely come from state legislation regulating the enjoyment of civil rights upon the basis of race. We boast of the freedom enjoyed by our people above all other peoples. But it is difficult to reconcile that boast with the state of the law which, practically, puts the brand of servitude and degradation upon a large class of our fellow citizens, our equals before the law. The thin disguise of "equal" accommodations for passengers in railroad coaches will not mislead anyone, nor atone for the wrong this day done....
Justice Harlan, dissenting.
Eight Justices in Plessy would, at least. But not one (from website, not decision itself):
It was said in argument that the statute of Louisiana does not discriminate against either race but prescribes a rule applicable alike to white and colored citizens. But this argument does not meet the difficulty. Everyone knows that the statues in question had its origin in the purpose, not so much to exclude white persons from railroad cars occupied by blacks, as to exclude colored people from coaches occupied by or assigned to white persons. Railroad corporations of Louisiana did not make discrimination among whites in the matter of accommodation for travellers. The thing to accomplish was, under the guise of giving equal accommodations for whites and blacks, to compel the latter to keep to themselves while travelling in railroad passenger coaches. No one would be so wanting in candor as to assert the contrary. The fundamental objection, therefore, to the statues is that it interferes with the personal freedom of citizens....If a white man and a black man choose to occupy the same public conveyance on a public highway, it is their right to do so, and no government, proceeding alone on grounds of race, can prevent it without infringing the personal liberty of each....
The white race deems itself to be the dominant race in this country. And so it is, in prestige, in achievements, in education, in wealth, and in power. So, I doubt not, it will continue to be for all time, if it remains true to its great heritage and holds fast to the principles of constitutional liberty. But in the view of the Constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here. Our Constitution in color-blind and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens. In respect of civil rights, all citizens are equal before the law. The humblest is the peer of the most powerful. The law regards man as man and takes no account of his surroundings or of his color when his civil rights as guaranteed by the supreme law of the land are involved....
The arbitrary separation of citizens, on the basis of race, while they are on a public highway, is a badge of servitude wholly inconsistent with the civil freedom and the equality before the law established by the Constitution. It cannot be justified upon any legal grounds
If evils will result from the commingling of the two races upon public highways established for the benefit of all, they will infinitely less than those that will surely come from state legislation regulating the enjoyment of civil rights upon the basis of race. We boast of the freedom enjoyed by our people above all other peoples. But it is difficult to reconcile that boast with the state of the law which, practically, puts the brand of servitude and degradation upon a large class of our fellow citizens, our equals before the law. The thin disguise of "equal" accommodations for passengers in railroad coaches will not mislead anyone, nor atone for the wrong this day done....
Justice Harlan, dissenting.
Last edited:
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XIII: Clinton destrueretur est. Trump est destruetur. Vox Pop
It appears that perhaps Trump is doing the age old tactic of releasing names to the media in advance of his VP announcement to test the waters.
Nate Silver says if he were Trump, he would pick the best of a poor lot and ask Pence...and that if he were Pence, he would turn it down.
It appears that perhaps Trump is doing the age old tactic of releasing names to the media in advance of his VP announcement to test the waters.
Nate Silver says if he were Trump, he would pick the best of a poor lot and ask Pence...and that if he were Pence, he would turn it down.
unofan
Well-known member
"Some" would? Who are those "some," and does that group include yourself?
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XIII: Clinton destrueretur est. Trump est destruetur. Vox Pop
No one with half a brain or whoever taught a black person. Nice try though...
No one with half a brain or whoever taught a black person. Nice try though...
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XIII: Clinton destrueretur est. Trump est destruetur. Vox Pop
The some would be either racists or people who forgot how bad many of the black schools were previous to Brown v. Board of Education.
The some would be either racists or people who forgot how bad many of the black schools were previous to Brown v. Board of Education.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XIII: Clinton destrueretur est. Trump est destruetur. Vox Pop
And yet, taking a look at syracuse.com the other day, I saw an article talking about how the race of a teacher was important.
And yet, taking a look at syracuse.com the other day, I saw an article talking about how the race of a teacher was important.
Resouce wise , certainly. But not the quality of the teacher.
FlagDUDE08
Banned
Re: Campaign 2016 Part XIII: Clinton destrueretur est. Trump est destruetur. Vox Pop
Also happening in Lewiston NY (near Niagara Falls).
It begins.....
Sure it is!!!
Also happening in Lewiston NY (near Niagara Falls).
- Status