Re: Campaign 2016 Part XII: What Have We Done To Deserve This?
Fact is a lot of progressive goals at this point in time need court sanctioned approval to proceed. While I agree its better to do things legislatively, you can't do that if the SCOTUS is ruling against you.
For example, we need not pass any new legislation giving the EPA expanded powers. What the EPA needs is the court's blessing as it uses the authority it already possesses to tighten emissions standards.
Same thing on campaign financing. Gun control as well. And the VRA. Until you get that 5th vote, you can pass laws regarding these subjects all day but they'll get shot down. I do agree that some libs got lulled into a false sense of security after Roberts boned his conservative masters on the ACA, and then Kennedy less surprisingly endorsed gay marriage.
IF Dems win WH, Senate and narrow gap in House, one of the first things I'd like to see done is a law complementing the Voting Rights Act. In that we need some uniform laws passed regulating what forms of ID are acceptable at polling places, requiring any such ID's are free to obtain and not a burden to obtain (no sending people to an overcrowded RMV that conveniently isn't staffed in minority areas like PA Goopers tried to do), making sure ballots and polling station access is equal across a state, etc etc etc. But, again, with an unfriendly court even if you pass that bill it will get struck down most likely despite its common sense approach to the problem of voting shenanigans.
In this election, at this time, for progressives to think big and push the envelope left, you need that SCOTUS. Its not any more complicated than that.
Fact is a lot of progressive goals at this point in time need court sanctioned approval to proceed. While I agree its better to do things legislatively, you can't do that if the SCOTUS is ruling against you.
For example, we need not pass any new legislation giving the EPA expanded powers. What the EPA needs is the court's blessing as it uses the authority it already possesses to tighten emissions standards.
Same thing on campaign financing. Gun control as well. And the VRA. Until you get that 5th vote, you can pass laws regarding these subjects all day but they'll get shot down. I do agree that some libs got lulled into a false sense of security after Roberts boned his conservative masters on the ACA, and then Kennedy less surprisingly endorsed gay marriage.
IF Dems win WH, Senate and narrow gap in House, one of the first things I'd like to see done is a law complementing the Voting Rights Act. In that we need some uniform laws passed regulating what forms of ID are acceptable at polling places, requiring any such ID's are free to obtain and not a burden to obtain (no sending people to an overcrowded RMV that conveniently isn't staffed in minority areas like PA Goopers tried to do), making sure ballots and polling station access is equal across a state, etc etc etc. But, again, with an unfriendly court even if you pass that bill it will get struck down most likely despite its common sense approach to the problem of voting shenanigans.
In this election, at this time, for progressives to think big and push the envelope left, you need that SCOTUS. Its not any more complicated than that.