This may have been on another thread so perhaps you didn't see it, but I said that it's not about me...it's a "collective" thing. When you say "some" people may be inconvenienced, those individuals "somes" add up to a lot. The NCAA obviously doesn't care what I think, most likely because the revenue for this is derived from football, basketball and TV (and probably everything is included in one contract with the stipulation that they "have to" carry college hockey as part of the agreement). I'm just saying that there is no incentive for them to attempt to insure good attendance. I'm going to find a way to go...personally, (as I already alluded to when discussing last weekend's event at TD Garden), I don't enjoy going to a game with 3/4 of the arena empty. It just is not as fun of an experience. But I don't understand your overall point. Nothing is absolute in life. I'm not using the word "every" in regard to anything. I'm saying "more" fans that go to the West regionals, due to the larger distances, have to stay overnight, meaning they are not commuting. So if they have to do that ANYWAY, why not put the games where people CAN commute on days where they are more likely to be able to go (like the weekend)? I don't understand what is so difficult to comprehend about that? I get more annoyed that people like you RESIST (or just plain don't get) what I am saying!