Those who focus entirely on the w/l record seem to have a very superficial understanding of Ivy League Athletics. Although nominally Division I, Ivy League schools athletics departments operate in many ways more like Division III schools. Obviously, lack of athletic scholarships comes to mind here, but there are other ways as well. If you read the NCAA guides, you will find that Division I schools are supposed to be more focused on providing entertainment to the student body (thus the requirements for larger playing venues) while Division III athletics are supposed to focus more on the personal development of the student athlete. Ivy League schools have the broadest array of NCAA sports of any league, despite being smaller in student population on average than most. And most of these sports attract very few spectators. Clearly, the emphasis on larger participation indicates that winning isn't everything (no Vince Lombardi here).
If you look at the Academic Index (AI) requirements in the Ivy League, this is another indicator that there are other considerations for a program beyond wins and losses. Most people are not aware of all 3 different requirements of the AI. Most are familiar with the individual athlete requirements. Some are aware of the school requirement for an average AI score across all athletes. However, most are not familiar with the inner workings of the team AI requirements. These are set by the institutions themselves to give guidance to coaches, so they know if a set of recruited athletes will be admitted. Each school sets each team's goals separately. Harvard, for example is known to have low team AI score averages for its helmet sports and higher for other sports, while IIRC Penn seems to emphasize basketball. I have no knowledge of where Brown allows lower AI scores, but I'd be willing to bet it is not in womens hockey.