What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

Re: Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

Also, with regard to the officiating- after every whistle, you could find a Princeton player chatting up and laughing with an official. I stood above the Princeton goal every period, and the the goalie and #'s 24, 25, and 27 were all charming the refs out of their pants. No wonder we couldn't buy a call late in the game...
 
Didn't think we were particularly sharp after the first period against Quinnipiac. DeFelippo certainly continued to lay his claim for additional playing time; while he let in a softie (the second Quinnipiac goal from the point), the save he made in the third period was the best we have seen all year, at least in my humble opinion.

A shame that the officiating became such a part of the storyline. It was as if after the five minute penalty assessed to Jones (which was marginal as a five but definitely a charge), the officials spent the entire rest of the game calling everything remotely marginal. The call on Maclellan in the power play was curious at best, as was the hook on Quinnipiac as Jacobsen was tripped into the goal (I thought Jacobsen was going to get called for goalie interference).

The other part of the story line may be something that was hinted at earlier,, in that Brown's characteristic depth is being challenged. Wahl and Robertson literally skated every other shift, especially after Buvinow got hurt - he made a great effort to come back, but it was obvious that he was very sore and tentative.

This team needs a second (and third) line to contribute more consistently. As solid as Harlow-Lamacchia-Hourihan played against UNH and PC, they were largely not a factor this past weekend, unfortunately. Also, when Quinnipiac wratcheted up the intensity in the second period, Brendan Whittet (wisely) used his timeout, but the Bears performed with a bit more anxiety, if you will. Credit the Bobcats for bringing that much energy and giving the Bears cause to look over their shoulders.

Buvinow was not playing great hockey, but if he is hurt, the responsibility of being the second pair will fall to someone who has to step us his game: Crowley, Quick, or DeConcylis. It will be interesting to see who rises to the challenge, particularly with a tough trip against two opponents against whom the Bears should match up well on the horizon.

And, lest we dwell on the downs, there may not be a better, more creative line in the ECAC right now than Lorito-Maclellan-Jacobsen. They are playing as well as any line I have seen at Brown in the past 15 years, maybe up there with Mssrs. Hanley and Chauvette from back in the mid-90s.
 
Re: Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

Buvinow was not playing great hockey, but if he is hurt, the responsibility of being the second pair will fall to someone who has to step us his game: Crowley, Quick, or DeConcylis. It will be interesting to see who rises to the challenge, particularly with a tough trip against two opponents against whom the Bears should match up well on the horizon.

Sounds like B could use Marc Carrier, whom I thought played quite well as a freshman. Is he coming back?
 
Re: Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

Should be an interesting weekend in the North Country. Based on past performances up there by Brown, taking 4 points is very doable. Does coach continue to push the McClellan line or give 3 rd and 4th more time? I'd like to see Draper and Ryan with more ice time. Clemente or De Filippo?
 
Re: Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

Should be an interesting weekend in the North Country. Based on past performances up there by Brown, taking 4 points is very doable. Does coach continue to push the McClellan line or give 3 rd and 4th more time? I'd like to see Draper and Ryan with more ice time. Clemente or De Filippo?

Given Clemente's recent rebound problems (which led to the first two goals against Princeton), I say let them split the weekend again. Start Marco Friday and then give Clemente a shot at redemption on Saturday. They've both been pretty good this season, but Clemente's control over his rebounds has just been awful of late. Noticed it against Yale, too.
 
Re: Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

Looking at the ECAC standings, if Brown wins today and Yale beats Clarkson, Brown moves up to a tie at 7th with Harvard. A lot better than 11th and it would be a move away from the packed bottom.
 
Re: Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

3 points on the North Country trip bodes well for Bruno, and it appears it could have been 4points but for a mistake by DeFilippo against Clarkson. The Clarkson announcers had nothing but praise for Marco, and attributed the mistake to his inexperience. Clemente then plays well against SLU. Does coach rotate them from now on? Anyone know how much time the first two lines had over the weekend? Hopefully the third and fourth with more time can contribute, especially as there are some talented players on those lines unlike past years.

RPI should be an interesting game for Brown as RPI always seems to have its number. Brown needs to come out flying and ignore RPI's record. Union is playing incredibly well. I watched the Dartmouth game and U destroyed D. Granted, D may not be as good as preseason expectations had it, but Union could have beaten any team that night.
 
Re: Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

I was just looking at some statistics, and a few things caught my eye:

-No scoring depth. After the first line, Farnham, and Wahl, point production dips rapidly. This is in congruence with the amount of playing time Whittet is giving his top two lines, and this needs to change. Yes, it's nice that Jack Mac has 19 points in 17 games, but we need distributed production, which we're not getting right now at all. I've been campaigning this for a couple weeks now; I'll reiterate: play the third and fourth lines as much as the first two, and they'll start scoring (unless the game's on the line; then put your best out there). We have fully-rested guys wasting away on the bench and getting maybe 10 minutes of ice time, while the top two lines dog their way through the latter stages of the 2nd and 3rd periods because they've been overworked. Not good.
-On paper, we have a fantastic goalie tandem. Clemente has a 2.43 GAA and .911 SVP, which are both good, but DeFillippo has a 1.89 and .948 (albeit in three games). This looks wonderful, but in reality, I'd say Clemente has had more than his fair share of shaky moments, including two juicy rebounds that Princeton converted to goals last weekend. Without those, we win. Likewise, DeFillippo played a tremendous game at Clarkson, but gave away the tying goal.
-Our defense is ridiculously improved from last year, but our offense is down (GAA is 13th in the nation, while GFA is not even in the top 40). This ties into the overplaying of the top two lines- we can't score when we're too tired. But we're so tired because we possess the puck most of the game in the offensive zone (Clarkson excluded), and generally dictate the pace of the game, which is always high velocity. This is also a reason why we have such a good defense: if you have the puck, they can't score. Our shots on goal per game is about even with our opponents, but from watching the games, you can tell we get the majority of the good scoring chances- most of their shots come from bad angles. If we took the kind of shots our opponents took every game, we'd be averaging around 40 shots/game, instead of 30. Quality over quantity.
 
Re: Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

-No scoring depth. After the first line, Farnham, and Wahl, point production dips rapidly. This is in congruence with the amount of playing time Whittet is giving his top two lines, and this needs to change. Yes, it's nice that Jack Mac has 19 points in 17 games, but we need distributed production, which we're not getting right now at all. I've been campaigning this for a couple weeks now; I'll reiterate: play the third and fourth lines as much as the first two, and they'll start scoring (unless the game's on the line; then put your best out there). We have fully-rested guys wasting away on the bench and getting maybe 10 minutes of ice time, while the top two lines dog their way through the latter stages of the 2nd and 3rd periods because they've been overworked. Not good.

I agree, to a degree, but insofar as Lamacchia, Harlow and Hourihan haven't been getting as many shifts. I think the bigger issue has been the loss of Hathaway. Since he has gone out, I think the Bears have struggled to find flow in the lines below the top line. And defensively, I think there has been just far too many inconsistencies in the offensive third. That is likely because of concern of taking rushes and getting exposed on the other end. I would love to see Robertson's shot get back on track - this is a guy who had five goals in his first 8 college games, but not much this year at all.

-On paper, we have a fantastic goalie tandem. Clemente has a 2.43 GAA and .911 SVP, which are both good, but DeFillippo has a 1.89 and .948 (albeit in three games). This looks wonderful, but in reality, I'd say Clemente has had more than his fair share of shaky moments, including two juicy rebounds that Princeton converted to goals last weekend. Without those, we win. Likewise, DeFillippo played a tremendous game at Clarkson, but gave away the tying goal.
DeFilippo generally plays a solid game, but has given up two softies: at Clarkson, and the second one against Quinnipiac. I'm not sure that he possesses the same ability to steal a game that Clemente has demonstrated (see: Yale playoffs, circa 2010), but it is a nice luxury for Coach Whittet to have at this point.

I'm cautiously optimistic, but the last time I got really excited about a weekend, coming off the UNH and PC wins, I got summarily disappointed by the team against Princeton and Quinnipiac. I just hope the squad doesn't rest on the laurels of a decent weekend up North and realizes that RPI is a team that has played very well against us since the playoff series two years ago, and Union is a very talented and deep side.
 
Re: Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

An inspirational story about the Brown hockey team.

The web link is http://goteamimpact.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=52&Itemid=40

__________________________________________________________________________


Ethan will Always Remember his First Goal

Ethan from Berkley MA, was diagnosed with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in January of 2011. As a result, Ethan has spent the last 11 months undergoing chemotherapy and steroid treatments at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute that will hopefully make him cancer free. Like many cancer patients, Ethan has found that going through this type of treatment is not only demanding on his body, but also very isolating. Plucked from his normal routine of school and playing with friends, Ethan was thrown into a scary whirlwind of IV's, tests, and hospital visits. It is during these tough times where people learn to lean on something or someone to help get them through. For Ethan, this has been the 34 members of the Brown Bears hockey team.

Growing up, many kids have a hero they idolize. In some cases it may be a famous musician or an award winning actor. To others, it may be a professional athlete or even a brilliant scientist. Regardless of who it may be, a child's idol can have an incredible impact on their life. They can help shape a child's hopes and dreams, and even direct them down a path in which they strive to be just like their childhood hero. To 7 year old Ethan, no one is held on a higher pedestal than Brown men's ice hockey team.

Throughout this experience, the team has made it clear to Ethan that he is not alone in his fight against leukemia. The team has been supporting Ethan through his treatment and they have become brothers, teammates, and idols to young Ethan.

Ethan, who found out about the organization from another Team IMPACT family, was drafted on to the Brown hockey team on October 5, 2011 and became the youngest Brown Bear to join the squad. As an official teammate, Ethan was outfitted with a team jersey and has become a constant presence at practices, in the locker room before games, and even laced up his skates for the first time and was taught how to skate by his 34 teammates.

Ethan spent time with his team on the ice learning to skate, shoot, and score all in one practice. The determination Ethan showed on the ice was emblematic of the courage he shows in his on-going fight with leukemia. Ethan's mom Debbie said of Ethan's time with the team, "Every time we go to the rink we feel like we are a big part of the team. Ethan's been learning about the sport, about teamwork, and learning how to skate. Every single moment around the team has been a special moment for Ethan and our entire family."

Since Draft Day, the team has started the hockey season and Ethan and his family have continued to build their relationship with the team both on and off the ice. Any day when Ethan is overwhelmed by his treatment, the team, and in particular assistant captain Bobby Farnham, has been there to console him. When Ethan just wants someone to talk to, Bobby will sit on the phone for as long as Ethan wants, talking about the life and times of a 7 year old fighting a life-threatening disease. When Ethan begged his Dad to build an ice rink in their back yard, Bobby was the first person to strap on a tool belt and head out to Berkley, MA to build the backyard rink.

When a child is diagnosed, every member of the family, including the siblings, has their own set of challenges to contend with. Not only has the Brown hockey team embraced Ethan, but consistent with the training Team IMPACT provides for the players, they have embraced the entire family. In the words of Ethan's Dad, "Not a day goes by when he doesn't ask for Bobby and the guys on the team. This has been incredible not only for him but our entire family. It is the best therapy imaginable." Consistent with an Ivy League effort, not only has the Brown hockey program embraced Ethan's entire family, but through this connection, Ethan's sister Madeline was recently adopted by the Brown women's gymnastics team. Both children are now going to be Brown Bears for life.

At each home game, Ethan greets the team with a fist bump and wishes them good luck right before they hit the ice. As Ethan's father noted, "Not many kids can say they have 34 big brothers; every single one of them has made an impact on him."
 
Re: Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

Can someone remind me of what Brian Sullivan means when he refers to the so-called "Brown Rule"? I'm sure it has momentous significance for the destiny of man (and woman), but I've completely forgotten what it's supposed to allude to. Thanks in advance.
 
Re: Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

Can someone remind me of what Brian Sullivan means when he refers to the so-called "Brown Rule"? I'm sure it has momentous significance for the destiny of man (and woman), but I've completely forgotten what it's supposed to allude to. Thanks in advance.

It started in his weekly picks last season (although it probably started in the 2009-10 season, but I couldn't figure out how to go farther back than the first couple weeks of last season)

Brian Sullivan said:
Colgate at St. Lawrence – 7:00

I can’t pick St. Lawrence to win, until they prove that they can. I’m calling it “the Brown rule”… sigh. 3-2 Colgate.

Basically, whenever a team has a long losing stretch, he invokes "the Brown rule" meaning that he won't pick them to win a game again until they actually win.
 
Re: Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

Can someone remind me of what Brian Sullivan means when he refers to the so-called "Brown Rule"? I'm sure it has momentous significance for the destiny of man (and woman), but I've completely forgotten what it's supposed to allude to. Thanks in advance.

It pretty much means we suck. :P I believe it had something to do with the last year of Grillo's tenure (I shuddered when I typed that name), when we just could not buy a win no matter what. burgie12 might have hit it on the head; I think it was along the lines of "if a team just can't seem to win a game, don't pick them no matter how much you like their chances to win."
 
Re: Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

All I know after this debacle is that Brendan had better skate this team ragged next week. If we don't rebound against Union, that is, but the way we played tonight wasn't good enough to beat anyone in the country. Getting shut out in two games against one of the worst teams in the NCAA is pathetic.
 
Re: Brown Hockey 2011-2012 - The Future Is Now

Can someone remind me of what Brian Sullivan means when he refers to the so-called "Brown Rule"? I'm sure it has momentous significance for the destiny of man (and woman), but I've completely forgotten what it's supposed to allude to. Thanks in advance.

It means that Brown only accepts the smartest students. Those who don't make it go to Boston University.
 
Back
Top