Barnier says there will be “no ratification at the council” today.
The council will be able to give a favourable opinion on the recommendation, and on the draft agreement. It is a draft, he stresses.
He says the council has to formally agree the agreement after the European parliament has ratified it.
He says there should be “no surprises” here.
He says he has done what he has done to ensure member states are well informed.
He says he believes it can be ratified by 31 October.
Not sure how you can blame parliament but OK. There was never going to be an acceptable deal. I know you can't or won't accept it, but the voters were sold a fantasy that somehow the UK would go from membership in a powerful trading bloc to single entity at a fraction of the size and yet still gain influence and wealth - and not just gain them, but get them overnight. That the issue of the border in Ireland would magically be solved, allegedly by technology although experts say that technology is a decade away. If the technology is ready and the resolution so simple, why have May and BoJo not deployed such technology on the island? Why have we not seen this wonderful technology at work, with BoJo and his Brexiteers trumpeting the success of such a system? Because it only exists in the imagination not reality. The entire campaign was a lie and the UK version of the FEC stated that if this were a binding resolution it would have thrown out the results, ordered a new election and chucked most of the Leave campaigners into jail. Considering it is a non-binding resolution it is baffling they are still going forward with it.
They should just leave. If both sides can’t agree on a deal, oh well.
Not sure how you are comfortable trying to make excuses cause someone was sold a line that they fell for when voting, or that people didn’t go and vote. The vote was held and these are the results.
Horrible outcome, but votes have consequences.
So c’est la vie
Plus you can shortly move to Scotland and set up shop![]()
These arrangements will become the settled position in these areas for Northern Ireland. This drives a coach and horses through the professed sanctity of the Belfast agreement.
For all of these reasons it is our view that these arrangements would not be in Northern Ireland’s long-term interests. Saturday’s vote in parliament on the proposals will only be the start of a long process to get any withdrawal agreement bill through the House of Commons.
I love it when a plan comes together. Irish unification, Scottish independence. Bye bye empire, empire; bye bye.
I still don't get why Boris or anyone wants a no deal Brexit. That seems like national, economic, and personal political suicide.
Because JRM and his business pals have taken positions against British interests and stand to make a ****load of money once England crash out. Despite the turmoil that would follow a no deal Brexit, the election would still be the Tory's to lose. The vote on the left will be split but the vote on the right will be united. The Brexit Party will no longer exist and will not be a threat to the Tories.
Is it really that simple? They shorted the UK and need to crash it to make their windfall?
I assume Dump is trying to do the same thing.
it is..“unlawful for Her Majesty’s government to enter into arrangements under which Northern Ireland forms part of a separate customs territory to Great Britain”.
By the Guardian's count BoJo's plan has a majority of two
No one really knows how the game is played
The art of the trade
How the sausage gets made
We just assume that it happens
But no one else is in the room where it happens
I thought if the DUP stood 100% against it then he was toast? How did he manage to pull enough of his Tory rebels back into the fold? Straight bribery?
It is a cardinal principle of constitutional law that the courts should not intrude on the legitimate affairs and processes of parliament.
Several Labour MPs are going to attach an amendment requiring a confirmatory public vote.