USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is well!
- Thread starter mookie1995
- Start date
- Status
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
I wasn't referring to that particular play. Miller and Koharski, specifically, have been ****ing horrible making simple tripping, hooking, holding, etc. calls. The call on MacAvoy on Monday night was a good example. The home game against UMass, calling holding on Greenway when he had the puck and had reached back to brush the defensive player's arm off his shoulder is another great example, that "roughing" penalty on Lane (I think?) near the end of the game when Greenway scored a shortie. The NU @ BU game on a Friday night back in November took 2 hours and 45 minutes, and it was not an OT game. I have no idea how it is possible, but these two idiots make the rest of the refs over the past 13 years look great.
I wasn't referring to that particular play. Miller and Koharski, specifically, have been ****ing horrible making simple tripping, hooking, holding, etc. calls. The call on MacAvoy on Monday night was a good example. The home game against UMass, calling holding on Greenway when he had the puck and had reached back to brush the defensive player's arm off his shoulder is another great example, that "roughing" penalty on Lane (I think?) near the end of the game when Greenway scored a shortie. The NU @ BU game on a Friday night back in November took 2 hours and 45 minutes, and it was not an OT game. I have no idea how it is possible, but these two idiots make the rest of the refs over the past 13 years look great.
brassbonanza
Super Serial
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
Oh you're right, those two have been terrible together. They call different styles of games and do not communicate well with one another on the ice, so you end up with a ridiculously inconsistent game, the worst of call kinds. They did the first BC game at Conte this year as well.
Oh you're right, those two have been terrible together. They call different styles of games and do not communicate well with one another on the ice, so you end up with a ridiculously inconsistent game, the worst of call kinds. They did the first BC game at Conte this year as well.
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
does it come with a cane?
does it come with a cane?
sterlippo1
Well-known member
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
congrats on your sweep of UML . I was going to pay for the feeds but what's the point?
congrats on your sweep of UML . I was going to pay for the feeds but what's the point?
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
You're trying to be mookie and, well, it's just not working for me.
You're trying to be mookie and, well, it's just not working for me.
sterlippo1
Well-known member
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
you think? that's exactly what i was doing but i do think BU will take both games, better team
you think? that's exactly what i was doing but i do think BU will take both games, better team
Friend_of_BU_Hockey
Registered User
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
In general I think Koharski lets the players play, whereas Miller calls anything/everything resembling physical contact. Miller also tends to be out of position and behind the play; the most notable example is the call against Carpenter late in the game @ BC that resulted in the BC GWG.
In general I think Koharski lets the players play, whereas Miller calls anything/everything resembling physical contact. Miller also tends to be out of position and behind the play; the most notable example is the call against Carpenter late in the game @ BC that resulted in the BC GWG.
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
I thought you were secure enough in your masculinity to not have that be an issue.
Are you bringing your daughter tonight? Isn't BU undefeated when you bring her??
I thought you were secure enough in your masculinity to not have that be an issue.
Are you bringing your daughter tonight? Isn't BU undefeated when you bring her??brassbonanza
Super Serial
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
Agreed, and that's the problem with pairing them. They have different views on play and they do a terrible job of conferring with one another before and during the game on how to call it, thus you get one ref calling a play one way and the other calling it another, leaving the players on the ice in an impossible conundrum of knowing what's allowed.
Agreed, and that's the problem with pairing them. They have different views on play and they do a terrible job of conferring with one another before and during the game on how to call it, thus you get one ref calling a play one way and the other calling it another, leaving the players on the ice in an impossible conundrum of knowing what's allowed.
Nick Papagiorgio
Holding court
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
In all fairness, UML had avoided the iron of the HE schedule for the majority of the season and has started to slide quite a bit now that they are getting the heavyweights (BU included).
In all fairness, UML had avoided the iron of the HE schedule for the majority of the season and has started to slide quite a bit now that they are getting the heavyweights (BU included).
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
I thought you were secure enough in your masculinity to not have that be an issue.
I'm in town already, so no kiddies
And yes, she is undefeated
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
So, because I'm trying to avoid doing work this afternoon, I checked out the HE standings. Terriers have four losses, three of which should have been wins - UConn, UVM and Merrimack. If we were able to get one of these back as a W, which one would you take?
So, because I'm trying to avoid doing work this afternoon, I checked out the HE standings. Terriers have four losses, three of which should have been wins - UConn, UVM and Merrimack. If we were able to get one of these back as a W, which one would you take?
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
All of them
Incredible how bu always seems to play down to their competition. Been an issue for the past 2 decades.
Hasn't changed
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
The 4-3 loss to Merrimack. The other two losses were stinkers, but BU outplayed Merrimack most of the game. Two weak goals in a 1:03 span of the second turned the tide and Delia slammed the door in the third.
The 4-3 loss to Merrimack. The other two losses were stinkers, but BU outplayed Merrimack most of the game. Two weak goals in a 1:03 span of the second turned the tide and Delia slammed the door in the third.
Friend_of_BU_Hockey
Registered User
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
I'd take all of them back as well.
Over the past few weeks they've taken care of UMASS, Maine, NU and Merrimack with relative ease.
I'd take all of them back as well.
Over the past few weeks they've taken care of UMASS, Maine, NU and Merrimack with relative ease.
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
Now see, this is the type of answer I was looking for. Jeez, I'd want all three back as well but my question was - if you could have ONE of them back, which one? Pay attention people! I actually should have expanded the question to include the ties as well. Given that I think BU fought back to tie both Providence games, I would have like the BC tie to be a win, given that BU was winning till a few minutes to go in the game and then BC tied it. Crap.
Now see, this is the type of answer I was looking for. Jeez, I'd want all three back as well but my question was - if you could have ONE of them back, which one? Pay attention people!
I actually should have expanded the question to include the ties as well. Given that I think BU fought back to tie both Providence games, I would have like the BC tie to be a win, given that BU was winning till a few minutes to go in the game and then BC tied it. Crap.Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
Big weekend for seeding and getting that bye. Much bigger then Monday. I'm afraid of them coming out flat tonight after the tough OT loss to their biggest rival. Let's hope in wrong (again)
Big weekend for seeding and getting that bye. Much bigger then Monday. I'm afraid of them coming out flat tonight after the tough OT loss to their biggest rival. Let's hope in wrong (again)
Re: Boston University 2015-16 thread part 2-move along! nothing to see here! all is w
Unfortunately it looks like you're not...
Unfortunately it looks like you're not...
- Status