What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Boston University 2012 Offseason

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Boston University 2012 Offseason

I would have gone with 10 year bowl ban, but vacating the wins was huge. That stripped them of the very thing they tried to protect by concealing the crimes.

I assume the big 10 will ban them from conf champ since they are banned from advancing to bcs - if they are even competitive

The B1G already did ban them from the conference championship and they will not be allowed to receive any of the BCS revenue that's distributed among conference members over the next four years. The sanctions are about as good as they can be without creating even more bystander victims who had nothing to do with this situation. If this plays any role in the BU task force, that would be an egregious mistake, since one of the cases the

y were tasked to investigate has already proven to be more or less false, and the other has been downgraded in severity since it occurred. I expect some basic recommendations about letting players into bars, giving them more training about how to handle themselves and who they associate with, yada, yada. Nothing more than that. Nicastro's dismissal of charges and the comments from the DA's office somewhat devalued the perceived urgent necessity of this task force.
 
Re: Boston University 2012 Offseason

Perhaps proven was the wrong word, but the fact that the DA dismissed all charges against Nicastro, and stated that they felt they would not be able to prove those charges makes it fairly apparent that was he was accused of did not occur as they alleged.
 
Re: Boston University 2012 Offseason

Uh, no it doesn't. It just means they didn't think they could prove the case. Nothing more than that. This isn't a case where the alleged victim admits they made it all up. Perhaps there's a chance that could still happen but to my knowledge, it hasn't yet.
 
Re: Boston University 2012 Offseason

Do they have scholarship $$?

triplecrown_1_7-6-08_t620.jpg
 
Re: Boston University 2012 Offseason

Where did Clendening's scholarship go?

Does anybody know the answer to this question? Did Clendening's money go to someone who was already locked in, say a reward to an upperclassman or something like that?
 
Re: Boston University 2012 Offseason

Does anybody know the answer to this question? Did Clendening's money go to someone who was already locked in, say a reward to an upperclassman or something like that?

I believe there is one available because one of the incoming recruits (Hetnik?) has a parent who is an employee of BU and thus can attend school at a 90% tuition discount, so a scholarship isn't necessary.
 
Re: Boston University 2012 Offseason

I believe there is one available because one of the incoming recruits (Hetnik?) has a parent who is an employee of BU and thus can attend school at a 90% tuition discount, so a scholarship isn't necessary.

Hetnik was decelerated to 2013 before the Clendening news broke. FL reported BU was looking to use his scholarship on an additional D instead of reaccelerating Hetnik. I haven't heard any news anywhere since then.
 
Re: Boston University 2012 Offseason

Uh, no it doesn't. It just means they didn't think they could prove the case. Nothing more than that. This isn't a case where the alleged victim admits they made it all up. Perhaps there's a chance that could still happen but to my knowledge, it hasn't yet.

True, but in cases like that which can be he said/she said anyway, what made them suddenly decide they couldn't prove it? It's most likely that the charges they had considered going for were too severe. I'm sure something really did happen, but what exactly we won't know.
 
Re: Boston University 2012 Offseason

Perhaps proven was the wrong word, but the fact that the DA dismissed all charges against Nicastro, and stated that they felt they would not be able to prove those charges makes it fairly apparent that was he was accused of did not occur as they alleged.

Murderers, rapists and drunk drivers walk all the time for the same reason, but it hardly means the crime didn't happen.
 
Re: Boston University 2012 Offseason

I think it's time to move on from this stuff until the task force comes up with their findings.

It's almost August... At this point we should be discussing more important stuff... like who will get kicked off the team next, which Terrier(s) will have their wrist broken by Nate Gerbe this season, and which BU players will be good candidates for the Pinhead Nation All-Milk Carton Team. :D

Side note: Did you know Jerry Sandusky was the OL coach for BU football in 1968? Didn't realize that until I perused the Freeh report a few days ago.
 
Re: Boston University 2012 Offseason

It's almost August... At this point we should be discussing more important stuff... like who will get kicked off the team next, which Terrier(s) will have their wrist broken by Nate Gerbe this season, and which BU players will be good candidates for the Pinhead Nation All-Milk Carton Team. :D
You are sure in a cheery mood today. :p

Side note: Did you know Jerry Sandusky was the OL coach for BU football in 1968? Didn't realize that until I perused the Freeh report a few days ago.
Crap, no wonder BU football had all it's wins from 1993-2011 vacated.
 
Re: Boston University 2012 Offseason

Uh, no it doesn't. It just means they didn't think they could prove the case. Nothing more than that....

I've acquired some insights into the inner workings of law enforcement over the years (not as a defendant!) so, if I may and with all due respect, there's more to the term "dismissal" than just an opinion that a case cannot be proven in court. Trust me, prosecutors are absolutely loath to dismiss a charge once brought, especially in cases that have gained a degree of notoriety or public interest. And to dismiss all charges in multiple-charge cases is very much a rarity. Invariably, prosecutors will reduce the charges before they dismiss them. If they had any shred of a case, especially one involving the emotions that go with alleged sexual offenses, most prosecutors would opt to play it out in front of a jury anyway and let the chips fall where they may. In prosecutor-speak, "dismissed" means "we have no case."

(BTW, I'm not an apologist for the institution located on lower Comm. Ave.)
 
Last edited:
Re: Boston University 2012 Offseason

Murderers, rapists and drunk drivers walk all the time for the same reason, but it hardly means the crime didn't happen.

If you can't tell the huge difference between someone "walking" - a slang term for someone tried and found not guilty, and someone whose charges were completely dropped prior to being put on trial, I'm not sure I can help you.
 
If you can't tell the huge difference between someone "walking" - a slang term for someone tried and found not guilty, and someone whose charges were completely dropped prior to being put on trial, I'm not sure I can help you.

Regardless of the actions here, "not guilty" does not equal "innocent". OJ was found not guilty (for example).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top