Re: Boston University 2012-13 Season Thread -- Part II
Okay so Cisse and Myron are gone.....and the team continues to lose. If its the players fault for quitting and leaving the program, why does the program still suck on the ice after these guys are gone?
There are eight other Hockey East programs that wished that they 'sucked' as much as BU over the past decade. So "suck" is a very relative term.
Cisse and Myron combined to score 4 goals and 2 assists for 6 points in 59 games. Cisse was playing regularly on the first line, when he chose to opt out.
Myron looked like a potentially decent two-way player. But no way he was a first or second line guy this year, on this team.
That is sometimes hard for drafted, incoming players to accept, when they don't turn it on and produce right away.
Bottom line: Cisse and Myron have no one to blame but themselves.
If they think the grass is greener elsewhere, good luck to them.
The only difficulty in replacing them is with actual bodies, because they quit on their team in midseason, rather than at the end of the year when they can be replaced.
Kurker was a second round draft choice for his potential, not for what was at the draft. He has good size and good hands, and skates pretty well when he decides that he wants to do that. He is far, far from the finished article. In fact, he really isn't close right now.
When he was in high school, the knock on him was that he cruise through games and pick his spots to turn it on. He can't do that at this level, and still be effective. He needs to learn to work every shift, and not make so many blind passes.
He would have benefited greatly from a year in the USHL, because it has only been lately that he looks like a legitimate college player. He is getting better, and he still could become pretty good.
If you want a comparison, Chiasson was also a second round draft choice. Other than their draft status, there isn't much else to compare them in their first year.
If people aren't happy with Kurker's development, what about O'Regan's. He is progressing very nicely, without as much of the hype.
Hohmann was unhappy as a freshman. He had always been a first line guy wherever he played, and he found himself on the third or fourth line last year. He didn't accept that assignment too well. But where did he deserve to play last season? Third or fourth line, at best. His attitude last year wasn't the best.
But he didn't quit. He stuck it out, and worked hard to get better.
How is it working out for him? Pretty darn well, if you ask me. And likely if you asked him, too
I'm sorry, but I have difficulty drumming up much, if any, sympathy for guys that quit on their teammates in midseason.
Too many players these days walk away, rather than work harder, when things don't go their way. They can't accept anything but instant gratification.
If you want to talk about about character guys, the backbone of hockey, don't talk about them. They don't have it. The proof is in their actions, both in lack of production when they do play, and abandoning ship when they don't get their way.