I'll take the bait. C'mon CB, that was an dumb post and you know it. And now with your retort you are trying to flip the perspective and make it sound like BU fans are saying that Parker is not at fault here. There is a large spread between a situation where the coach not quitting before an investigation is even concluded means he has no shame and a situation where the coach could be found to be part of the problem and could be disciplined or even be asked to step down. You know I'm as ready as anyone for Parker to move on, but saying he has no shame in this situation is ridiculous.
Based on what I read on here, I would say 80% of BU fans approved of how Parker handled the Trivino situation. He made clear what the boundary was, Trivino stepped over it, and he was immediately removed from the team. Nicastro's case on the surface seems much more troubling both in terms of the offense allegedly committed, and the fact that it seemed that he had somewhat of a reputation for being a "womanizer" or whatever you want to call it. So I do fault Parker for not recognizing that he potentially had a time bomb on his hands, but I don't think it is appropriate that he quit just as a result of it. Again, I do wish he would step down, but my reasons are because of what I see with the on-ice results. Now, that could all change if it comes to light that he really ignored some signs with Nicastro, or if he has really been an enabler of the mentality that these guys walk on water.