Or 24-25
Yip!
I also find it interesting that he's happy with half of his defense (Gryba, Escobedo, Nicastro), but the unit as a whole gets an 'F'. I actually don't think Warsofsky's been bad at all (in fact, I think he's been even better than Gryba), and I think Escobedo and Nicastro, although their freshmen and you can't be too tough on them, have certainly contributed to the problems on defense. They've had their fair share of miscommunications and turnovers, too.
team defense includes the forwards backchecking.. he didnt ever mention that in the report, but based on all his comments about lack of effort - this would probably be one of the first things to go. that can make any defense look really bad
Good point. This is actually something that hasn't been talked about enough this year (I guess that's what happens when you have crappy media coverage ). There have been so many times this year when no one's picked up the high man on the rush or a defenseman jumping up on offense. There have also been a number of times when I've seen forwards just glide on the backcheck and make little to no effort to actually try and break up the play.
Good point. This is actually something that hasn't been talked about enough this year (I guess that's what happens when you have crappy media coverage ). There have been so many times this year when no one's picked up the high man on the rush or a defenseman jumping up on offense. There have also been a number of times when I've seen forwards just glide on the backcheck and make little to no effort to actually try and break up the play.
Yip-pee!Yip!
Love Nick LaSpada ( best athlete in Mass)
mookie,
it's clear the closest you came to playing a sport is standing along the glass at your 7 year olds hockey games.
Of course its up to the players to do their part on the ice including playing with passion, grit, heart, smarts and determination. When it comes to playing with smarts, I believe, apparently unlike you, that these boys have all been "taught" positionally where to be on the ice and that the group of returning players demonstrated all of the above throughout last year.
So, if that is the case, what's the problem with them this season? Did their passion, focus, work ethic, grit, smarts, etc suddenly abandon them? Why did they have it last year and not have it this year?
From my perspective, there are a number of reasons for this including 1. that the coaches rely heavily on a small group of players over and over not figuring out whether there are others on the team that, with consistent ice time, can bring this team more of what is lacking on the ice. With the amount of ice time this corp group sees they aparently don't have legs in the third period.
I also believe...and all it is is my opinion.... 2. that JP is a negative coach by nature. He accentuates the negatives behind closed doors with the players because that is his personality. With a young team lacking the unbelievable leadership of MG and JM to counteract his negativity, this team fullfills its coaches negative messages to them.
3. This team is lacking in doing the little things like smart line changes and short crisp shifts. If this is the players fault, bench them and send a message. I know this team doesn't have the third and fourth line depth of last years but compared to most teams they play the talent top to bottom exceeds the competition. If it doesn't then go back to your post about coaches duties....are they good at shopping?
This isn't a one year phenominon. Look at the Terriers performance this decade. They have struggled, not been able to win the big games and generally disappointed their fans each season, except for last year.
I am not excusing the players. They certainly are responsible too. They have to do it when the puck drops and be prepared to execute the game plan the coaches have prepared. Coaching should be about physically and mentally preparing a team to succeed. Among the most important prep items at this level and above, I believe is leadership and mental preparation. That is what separates success from failure. It is also my opinion most teams take on the personality of their coach and with the exception of last year I think that has been the case with the Terriers the last 10 years.
Therefore, I am concluding that the coaches have not prepared these players to mentally succeed as well as they are capable of. Is that all the coaches responsibilty? No, the players share in it and have responsibility too. With a senior class like last year's leading the way and neutralizing the negativity, that team acheived amazing success and had more mental toughness than I've seen from any team any where in a long time.
That is all I'm trying to say.
Mookie, in closing, your personal characterizations are humorous and only the more so when I review your many posts and consider the source.
Some scattershooting of thoughts with too much time on my hands:
I'm glad to see parker somewhat acknowledging his over use of a small group of players that had good seasons last year. This, in my mind, would lead one to conclude he needs to give others that show work ethic and heart in practice and the little time on the ice in games a larger role coming out of Christmas break to see if they can make a positive impact with larger roles.
I also noticed he talked about all "3" goaltenders when he mentioned it would be a strong suit for the team. He than went on to talk about the horrible save percentage year to date. The horrible save % and w-l record is with the two that have played.
He says he thinks those two can easily turn that around given their history (haven't seen any indication Rollheiser can be effective this year or last...he had a couple of shutouts with one or two scoring ops with last year's team in front but in tough games has not done much in my mind to demonstrate they can actually win a game on his back). I guess he should either refer to only "2" goalies as that's all he uses or give Kraus a shot once and for all. I'm tired of him implying Kraus can play when we never finds out in a game if that kid is a D-1 goalie.
I agree with other posters discussion of lack of back checking among forwards and wonder why that is not mentioned by him. That is effort and if there are no consequences to lack of effort its poor coaching because it reinforces that lack of effort will be tolerated.
Reading that letter depressed me because there seems to be nothing in there suggesting anything will change as the year goes on.
The recruiting and replenishment of talent does not seem to look too good going forward and the lack of planning to replace the enormous loss of talent last year is biting the Terriers in the a** this year. The loss of Quinn will only become a more glaring issue as time goes by.
I'm afraid the next few years could give us Terrier fans a real understanding of what its like to cheer for Providence or Merrimack.
Nicastro was cut from the final roster of National team
Chris Brown of Michigan
Good news on this day of festivus, we still CAN put up a 30 win season.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uuUTEOJuEmk
for those that didn't see it. typical yip, gets on ice...checks, checks again, maybe should've been called, scores. the announcer had that line in the back of his head...