What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Boston College Hockey 2009-2010

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Boston College Hockey 2009-2010

A lot of empty seats around the rink. Harvard goalie kept it close as BC missed 3-4 grade A chances. But I'm glad BC came out on top, 3-2. A Win is a win.
 
Re: Boston College Hockey 2009-2010

A lot of empty seats around the rink. Harvard goalie kept it close as BC missed 3-4 grade A chances. But I'm glad BC came out on top, 3-2. A Win is a win.
I thought it was strange when they pulled Richter, but maybe just to shake up the team a bit. Didn't see where any of the BC goals were soft. The kid they brought in did a heck of a job though. Stoned us on some very nice chances.

Speaking of goalies, Milner is solid between the pipes. I feel we have an equal chance to win whether it be Muse or Milner in net. A good situation for the team. :)

Good win Eagles! Had to grind that one out.
 
Re: Boston College Hockey 2009-2010

Could be the worst BU-BC flamefest yet. Yikes. :confused:

back off yankeefat, you bully.

that fact that he is even able to post is a minor miracle. how he mashes his sausage fingers on the keyboard and still somehow concocts complete sentences is beyond me.
 
Re: Boston College Hockey 2009-2010

Good win against a team that (IMO) is poised to break out and start winning some games once they hit the bulk of their conference schedule. What was with that scrap at the end of the game - I think it was Gibbons and Leblanc?- not who I'd expect to see going at it for either team.
 
Re: Boston College Hockey 2009-2010

Leblanc shot the puck (accurately) after the whistle (enough after to seem deliberate) which the BC players (appropriately imo) took offense to. I'm sure the kid is just frustrated, but still...
 
Re: Boston College Hockey 2009-2010

Leblanc shot the puck (accurately) after the whistle (enough after to seem deliberate) which the BC players (appropriately imo) took offense to. I'm sure the kid is just frustrated, but still...

leblanc was getting beat up all night. i dont know what he did to deserve such rough treatment throughout the game. the shot after the whistle was still rather bush league.
 
Re: Boston College Hockey 2009-2010

Up 2-0 and 3-1, it felt like BC was always in control. Credit to Harvard for not packing it in and then capitalizing on Wey's mistake. BC did a good job after that in weathering the storm and did all the little things necessary to win. The only thing they couldn't do last night is really put Harvard away, but that's gonna happen. Only took three penalties which is always important.

Looking at the box score, Gibbons and LeBlanc were the only ones penalized for that scrum. Couldn't tell from where I was sitting. LeBlanc had a near breakaway in the 2nd, but couldn't settle the puck out of mid-air at center ice...

There was another play in the 3rd where I believe Carey put one across the crease but had no angle to put it in...

Breakout seemed crisp to me for the most part. The defense has been a pleasant surprise.

Never easy to win on the road, I don't care who you're playing.

Milner is 4-0 with a 2.25 GAA and .905 save percentage. Not too shabby for someone who wouldn't be here if Muse wasn't coming off an injury. Hopefully Muse can build off his 30 save performance at BU...

One loss in the last 10 games and even that was a game they could/should have won. One last thing to point out, we all know protecting 3rd period leads was an issue last year. This year: really, the only game that sticks out is the 4-4 tie at UNH. At least it wasn't a loss!

One game to go before the break. Providence has just one win in their last six. Oddly enough, it came against a good UML team. They'll also be playing UNH Friday night while BC will be resting. Let's go to the break with a win.
 
Re: Boston College Hockey 2009-2010

Good win against a team ranked 55th of 58 that (IMO) is poised to break out and start winning some games once they hit the bulk of their conference schedule in which they are 1-5-2 .



FYP, I like your thought process, but um, good wins aren't usually deducted from a teams RPI due to a negatively affecting it. Just saying.
 
Re: Boston College Hockey 2009-2010

UVM blows chunks. I wouldn't be surprised if they don't make it out of the quarters. In the event the two teams meet, there isn't much doubt as to what would happen given BC's domination of UVM in games that matter (we're talking postseason games for you UVM brainiacs that don't understand "polls that matter" --> AFA is not ranked but in the vicinity of 39th in the country and Yale is 18th while BC is 4th).

Sidenote: Where's the outrage over PWR since BC is 4 and UVM is 20 but UVM took 2 of 3 from BC? Or do we get that come March from the UVM Mensa members when UVM misses the NCAAs?
 
Re: Boston College Hockey 2009-2010

UVM blows chunks. I wouldn't be surprised if they don't make it out of the quarters. In the event the two teams meet, there isn't much doubt as to what would happen given BC's domination of UVM in games that matter (we're talking postseason games f...

What was BC's record last year in the post season ???

nick-ima-dumass said:
Sidenote: Where's the outrage over PWR since BC is 4 and UVM is 20 but UVM took 2 of 3 from BC? Or do we get that come March from the UVM Mensa members when UVM misses the NCAAs?

Actually or all intelligent one, the PWR require 10 games against top 25 opponents, since BC hasn't they don't meet the requirements. As UVM has met this requirement, I would say by default UVM is ahead of BC. But let me spell it out for you since I realize you struggle with anything that doesn't involve orgies in a love palace with your friends :

PWR i-s w-o-r-t-h-l-e-s-s i-n d-e-c-e-m-b-e-r
 
Re: Boston College Hockey 2009-2010

What was BC's record last year in the post season ???
Depends on how you define it. To me, the post-season starts once the Hockey East regular season is over. So BC was 2-1 with the question you asked. UVM was 2-3. Obviously the 2-1 in the NCAAs is better than what BC put together, but that wasn't really the question (as I interpret it) that you asked.

Oh well, back to your arguing.

Edit: Never mind, I see J.D. posted the same.
 
Re: Boston College Hockey 2009-2010

Actually or all intelligent one, the PWR require 10 games against top 25 opponents, since BC hasn't they don't meet the requirements. As UVM has met this requirement, I would say by default UVM is ahead of BC.

You're a sweet little short-bus riding turd which is why everyone enjoys beating up on you (and I also do enjoy to indulge).

First, UVM 4-5-1 against current TUCS. BC is 4-2-2. So why you think UVM is ahead of BC in this regard makes no sense. They have a higher winning % and will continue to outpace UVM. UVM does not get a point because they have fulfilled the 10 game requirement while BC has not. BC could lose the next 2 against TUC and if the TUCs remain the same BC will still be higher at 4-4-2 than UVM at 4-5-1.

Second, in case you haven't noticed, PWR right now mirrors the RPI. Take away your trivial little ways to make UVM a better team and you have BC with a far better RPI right now. And this heavily drives PWR as it is the tie breaker in tied pairing. Bc is always going to win that comp unless disaster strikes BC and UVM performs miracles.

That is all. Go back to the fryolator.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top