What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Big Ten > NCHC

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

Personally I feel pretty good about guessing that SCSU goes 9-6 for the rest of the regular season (counting ties as .5). I'd put the over at about -150 on that line.

I feel less confident on 10-5. There I'd put the over at maybe +120, with the under at maybe -125.

The NCHC, night in and night out, is the toughest to play against, and 14 of their 15 remaining games are conference games, with a real good Mankato team as their only remaining non-conference foe.

Wow, finally an intelligent post. I like your thinking in this post SJHovey.
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

Sure, Oxford was an option for me, but SCSU just offered so much more in terms of convenience.

You want to know how we know you're not qualified for an Ivy-level education? We've read your posts here. Go read the Ivy threads. There's a difference.

I never said I was qualified for an Ivy level education. I never applied to a single college, I signed up to go into the Army soon after my Jr year of high school, before I went to UMD, and it was the Army who tested me and determined I was a good candidate to go to West Point. I heard that only 0.1% of the Top 0.1% of those who joined the Army were offered the opportunity I was.

And delusional SCSU fans who do not want to accept reality are not what I'd call unbiased judges of anything. So I could care less what you or any other SCSU fans thinks of my posts.



Btw, if I went to the Ivy threads, I'd assume I was talking to a MUCH higher degree of educated individuals, and would approach them much differently.

Just because I'm talking down to you NEANDERTHALS doesn't mean I am also a Neanderthal. lol

Not saying all SCSU fans are Neanderthals, I mean, my sister and brother in law are very intelligent people, who both could have gone to the U of Mn or even better schools, but like you, went to SCSU for reasons of convenience, I'm assuming, I never actually asked them.
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

Ok, 2 posters predicting 13-2, and one predicting 9-6.


I need a few more before I can know what I want to offer in the way of wagers. I need to know if SCSU fans are willing to back up all of their big talk or not?? I'm starting to think that they aren't willing to do so? lol Pretty typical.
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

I've got plenty, just not dumb enough to tell you all of my inside info, when I'm trying to induce you to bet against me!!! I want either your money, or to make you look bad. I could care less about "looking smart".

It is YOU who has nothing. You talk a lot of smack, but aren't willing to back it up. Just a blowhard.

If the majority of posters in this thread post their predictions of how SCSU will do their next 15 games, then I will reveal my info, my stats, my facts, my reasonings. But not until SCSU fans at least pony up their predictions first.


See, to be honest this should be taken as a compliment, I'm giving SCSU fans credit for being smart enough, that if I gave you all I have, that they might actually, subliminally, take into account what I say and adjust their predictions to reflect a more realistic prediction. I'm trying to take advantage of you when you are in the delusional state being #1 puts you in, lol.
 
Last edited:
I've got plenty, just not dumb enough to tell you all of my inside info, when I'm trying to induce you to bet against me!!! I want either your money, or to make you look bad. I could care less about "looking smart".

It is YOU who has nothing. You talk a lot of smack, but aren't willing to back it up. Just a blowhard.

Keep lip flappin...
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

LMMFAO, 3 to 1 odds??? SCSU is the #1 ranked team in the entire country, in the only rating system that matters, and all you are willing to give me is 3 to 1 odds that they lose 8 of their remaining 15 games? You must think I'm the moron some here have suggested I am???
YOU said YOU weren't sure they would win half their games. So technically an even odds bet on one game over .500 would be fair. A 2 to 1 bet would be a great deal, 3 to 1 I am overpaying.

Don't back down now. We almost believed you meant all the garbage you spewed.
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

Had I chose the West Point route, it would have added an additional 9 years to my contract and anyone having put in 13 years, especially someone having graduated from WP, would surely feel it best to serve another 7, so that they could get retirement benefits. So, finish up my last 3 years of my contract, or stick with the Army for another 19 years???

It's a 5-year commitment post graduation and you're telling us you were in the service for 13 years before you entered college?

I'm kicking myself for even asking...
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

YOU said YOU weren't sure they would win half their games. So technically an even odds bet on one game over .500 would be fair. A 2 to 1 bet would be a great deal, 3 to 1 I am overpaying.

Don't back down now. We almost believed you meant all the garbage you spewed.

SCSU fans EXPOSED!!!

Nothing but a bunch of BLOWHARDS!!!

All their talk about being #1 in the only rating service that matters was just hot air I guess. lol So typical. All talk, no walk.
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

It's a 5-year commitment post graduation and you're telling us you were in the service for 13 years before you entered college?

I'm kicking myself for even asking...


Well, it was 30 years ago, so its possible it was 5 years, not 7? Or maybe it was 7 then, and only 5 now? Either way, adding the 5/7 years to the 4 years at West Point, along with the 1 year at West Point Prep, along with the 1 year I would already have served before starting at WPP, means it would have been at least 11 years, if not 13. Either way it would have been over half way to retirement.

And why would you kick yourself for asking? Do you suspect that I am lying?
 
well, it was 30 years ago, so its possible it was 5 years, not 7? Or maybe it was 7 then, and only 5 now? Either way, adding the 5/7 years to the 4 years at west point, along with the 1 year at west point prep, along with the 1 year i would already have served before starting at wpp, means it would have been at least 11 years, if not 13. Either way it would have been over half way to retirement.

And why would you kick yourself for asking? Do you suspect that i am lying?

stolen valor
 
Re: Big Ten > NCHC

When asked why we will struggle...you have nothing.
The blowhard is you.

Seriously? I've already given you the reasons, but none of you have a brain, so, you interpreted what I posted as nothing, apparently. lol That is what I figured. This is TOO easy, lol.

OK, that is going overboard, you all have brains, you just let your emotions get in the way of using them.


I'm not a blowhard, because there is nothing I need to blow hard about. I simply post facts and stats and SCSU fans are the ones who get their panties in a bunch.
 
Last edited:
Seriously? I've already given you the reasons, but none of you have a brain, so, you interpreted what I posted as nothing, apparently. lol That is what I figured. This is TOO easy, lol.

I'm not a blowhard, because there is nothing I need to blow hard about. I simply post facts and stats and SCSU fans are the ones who get their panties in a bunch. lol

K.
Then give the facts...why will we struggle in the 2nd half?
Why is our schedule so weak when its 6th in the country according to your precious KRACH rating.
You've said nothing and honestly...i fully expect that to continue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top