What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

Biden v Dump 1: If not now, when? If not us, who?

Status
Not open for further replies.
After listening to the Lincoln Project podcast about vote counting, I'm 90% expecting the election to be decided by the courts. The worst thing I heard which I hadn't already been aware of, is that the Trump campaign has already recruited "poll watchers" to invade every democratic-voting precinct in the country to verbally challenge EVERY absentee ballot signature on the chance to slow things down enough to give the courts a month or two to make the call, and 2) to get every ballot possible thrown out in those precincts because of imperfect signature matches etc. Keep in mind that while this is perfectly "legal", sometimes the signatures they are comparing to the one on your ballot can be 30 or 40 years old. Meanwhile the Dumpie worshippers have been trained to think that absentee voting is un-American, so their in-primate votes will all be eagerly tallied up by the complicit cable news on November 3, giving the buffoon a huge lead and ammunition to argue that the courts should just stop the "fraudulent" count.
So... vote anyway, I guess? But the voters won't decide the election.
 
geezer said:
After listening to the Lincoln Project podcast about vote counting, I'm 90% expecting the election to be decided by the courts. The worst thing I heard which I hadn't already been aware of, is that the Trump campaign has already recruited "poll watchers" to invade every democratic-voting precinct in the country to verbally challenge EVERY absentee ballot signature on the chance to slow things down enough to give the courts a month or two to make the call, and 2) to get every ballot possible thrown out in those precincts because of imperfect signature matches etc. Keep in mind that while this is perfectly "legal", sometimes the signatures they are comparing to the one on your ballot can be 30 or 40 years old. Meanwhile the Dumpie worshippers have been trained to think that absentee voting is un-American, so their in-primate votes will all be eagerly tallied up by the complicit cable news on November 3, giving the buffoon a huge lead and ammunition to argue that the courts should just stop the "fraudulent" count.
So... vote anyway, I guess? But the voters won't decide the election.
Click to expand...

I'm surprised nobody has successfully challenged the poll watchers as being what they obviously are. I don't know what Roberts would rule. On the one hand, intimidation of voters is clearly illegal and unconstitutional. On the other hand, it could help keep the heists rolling. But I'm surprised we haven't seen this go to SCOTUS. And I'm surprised there haven't been a flood of laws in the civilized states making this Nazi crap illegal, even as red states embrace it.
 
geezer said:
After listening to the Lincoln Project podcast about vote counting, I'm 90% expecting the election to be decided by the courts. The worst thing I heard which I hadn't already been aware of, is that the Trump campaign has already recruited "poll watchers" to invade every democratic-voting precinct in the country to verbally challenge EVERY absentee ballot signature on the chance to slow things down enough to give the courts a month or two to make the call, and 2) to get every ballot possible thrown out in those precincts because of imperfect signature matches etc. Keep in mind that while this is perfectly "legal", sometimes the signatures they are comparing to the one on your ballot can be 30 or 40 years old. Meanwhile the Dumpie worshippers have been trained to think that absentee voting is un-American, so their in-primate votes will all be eagerly tallied up by the complicit cable news on November 3, giving the buffoon a huge lead and ammunition to argue that the courts should just stop the "fraudulent" count.
So... vote anyway, I guess? But the voters won't decide the election.
Click to expand...

If Biden wins by 12 it will be over Election Night.

If Biden wins by 8 it will be dragged through the courts for weeks if not months.

If Biden wins by 4 it will be stolen again.
 
Kepler said:
If Biden wins by 12 it will be over Election Night.

If Biden wins by 8 it will be dragged through the courts for weeks if not months.

If Biden wins by 4 it will be stolen again.
Click to expand...

The monkey wrench in the works is a huge disparity between R's voting day-of, and D's voting absentee (thanks to Dump's scare tactics and meddling). I don't give him enough credit to have realized it ahead of time (it was probably either the "Jared" or "Stephen" android that output the strategy), but day-of votes are always, for some reason, counted before they start counting absentee votes, which this year will be 50% of them, and 75% of Biden's votes.
In other words, no matter what, Trump will be up by more than 12% at midnight November 3. Anything that happens after that is just "thugs, rioters, and looters - along with Chinese ballot-printing operations, no doubt - trying to overturn your election."
 
I was stuck entertaining a drunk from Yreka once. He rambled on and on for double after double until he was 86'd from the bar, so needless to say I now know everything I need to know about NorCal. ;-)
 
I dont think half the votes cast will be absentee...they started the USPS purge too early for that. Also remember that plenty of states use mail in voting anyways so they are out in front of this. Those states will start sorting out the mail in votes as soon as they arrive and will count them like they always do. People showed during the primaries that they care enough to show up and wait in line with masks on if needed.

Personally I vote early in person (cause my state allows that...all states should) so I have minimal contact with people anyways so I will vote in person and Trump and DeJoy can suck it.
 
Handyman said:
I dont think half the votes cast will be absentee...they started the USPS purge too early for that. Also remember that plenty of states use mail in voting anyways so they are out in front of this. Those states will start sorting out the mail in votes as soon as they arrive and will count them like they always do. People showed during the primaries that they care enough to show up and wait in line with masks on if needed.

Personally I vote early in person (cause my state allows that...all states should) so I have minimal contact with people anyways so I will vote in person and Trump and DeJoy can suck it.
Click to expand...

We have the option of drop-off ballot boxes here so I'll use that. Allows me to a) do it early, b) avoid crowds, and c) be sure the election board got it.
 
Kepler said:
I grew up in Nixon's America. The scumbags have always been here. My god, some of them are the same people!

ejbc20hu0aaujy_.jpg


The point is the ideals are a good way to live and govern. If Jefferson and Washington were slave owners, then Jefferson and Washington were flawed people. Just like every hero has been. I'm sure MLK was a raging homophobe. People are a product of their times and places.

The idea is to reach for better -- perfect will always be impossible. To see the injustice that we can and correct it. Then we can lie down in our graves and sleep the sleep of the just. Others will come after and judge us by their standards, and doubtless find us wanting. But we will have done what we could. This is not idealism, it is pragmatism.



I don't want to burn it all down, that way almost never works. The bones of this country and our traditions, even if honored in the breach, are sound. Certainly there are many better places to live now, where people are more free, have better lives, and more human dignity, but so much the better -- we have models to emulate now, we don't have to be pioneers like Franklin and Madison.

Revolutions almost always cause massive pain for the common people while the as-sholes who were responsible for the sins of the old regime skate. And even in those rare instances when they are caught and punished, bloodshed typically just expands in ever-widening circles and drowns the innocent. Robespierre and Lenin and Mao and Mugabe were great liberators. Until they weren't. Instead, we need to be FDR or Mandela: they evolved the existing system and improved it radically. Their changes are real and lasting.

There is nothing fundamentally wrong with America that a long, long run of radical Left reforms can't fix. But you can't use dynamite in a surgery.
Click to expand...
The difference between your view and my view is thus: You view the foundations of America as ideal and sound. I view the foundations of America as racist and plutocratic. They are not worth saving if we want actual progress, because the system is designed to stop progress for as long as possible (the only two real moments of progress in this country came after a civil war and an economic meltdown, and they both didn’t do nearly enough as they should have).

In all honestly, in regards to the Constitution, only the First and Third Amendments are worth saving. Every other piece needs to be overhauled.
 
geezer said:
After listening to the Lincoln Project podcast about vote counting, I'm 90% expecting the election to be decided by the courts. The worst thing I heard which I hadn't already been aware of, is that the Trump campaign has already recruited "poll watchers" to invade every democratic-voting precinct in the country to verbally challenge EVERY absentee ballot signature on the chance to slow things down enough to give the courts a month or two to make the call, and 2) to get every ballot possible thrown out in those precincts because of imperfect signature matches etc. Keep in mind that while this is perfectly "legal", sometimes the signatures they are comparing to the one on your ballot can be 30 or 40 years old. Meanwhile the Dumpie worshippers have been trained to think that absentee voting is un-American, so their in-primate votes will all be eagerly tallied up by the complicit cable news on November 3, giving the buffoon a huge lead and ammunition to argue that the courts should just stop the "fraudulent" count.
So... vote anyway, I guess? But the voters won't decide the election.
Click to expand...

I'm guessing this may differ state by state?

Could be overlooking something, but a brief overview of the Michigan challenge laws appear to show that you cannot challenge the actual signature. You can challenge that an absentee voter does not belong to that voting district, but it looks like the clerk determines the validity of the signature.

The law also says that you need "good reason" to challenge, and that you cannot challenge for the purpose of delaying or annoying voters. Surely a challenge on every single ballot would fall under that umbrella.
 
Bronco said:
I could already tell by his strike zone.
Click to expand...

Fat Joe has a fascist strike zone, always has...

"If you're against me, I'm punching you out, end of story."

He's been a shit ump for decades, as has Angel Fernandez.

Time to consider a meritocracy across the board, politics and sports alike.
 
The best is all the people looking for Craigslist ads asking for actors to wave signs. You would think they would be smart enough to try and recruit people in a less public way. What the numbnuts on Parlour charge too much?
 
I got another crazytown mailer from the Michigan GOP last week. None of the mailers I've received are pro-Chump. With him not spending any money on ads here right now, it seems the state party apparatus is all-in on a strategy of painting Biden as a puppet of Bernie & the Squad, with a goal of getting suburbanites to stay home or go third party.

According to my mom, my parents' GOP state rep paid them a visit this afternoon. He won by 10 points during the 2018 Blue Wave, so I don't think he himself has much to worry about. I assume with the current poll numbers the state GOP has decided to use their pols as door-to-door foot soldiers in their districts to drum up support for Trump and (in the case of my parents) Elissa Slotkin's opponent in MI-8.

If Chump loses WI and MI this time around, that leaves only one realistic path to a legitimate victory - hanging onto Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Arizona. From the polls I'm seeing on 538, he's also going to have to battle to hang on to North Carolina. While Texas and Georgia are polling closer than they ever have in my lifetime, I doubt they will flip this cycle since Republicans remain firmly in charge of both.

It's highly unlikely he's going to flip any state that didn't flip for him in 2016. The only other plausible victory scenario is he narrowly loses AZ, but wins the other three plus NE-2 and ME-2. That would force a 269-269 tie that goes to Congress.
 
Yeah we got another one of those mailers too. They arent even made well a kid with a laser printer and a jacked copy of Photoshop could do a better job.
 
So wait...is Trump saying that Joe Biden took steroids or HGH in order to sound better and smarter? 2 questions:

1) Has he never watched sports?

2) Why the hell isnt he taking PEDS it would make walking up steps and down ramps easier. Probably solve his "swaying" problems as well.
 
Handyman said:
So wait...is Trump saying that Joe Biden took steroids or HGH in order to sound better and smarter? 2 questions:

1) Has he never watched sports?

2) Why the hell isnt he taking PEDS it would make walking up steps and down ramps easier. Probably solve his "swaying" problems as well.
Click to expand...

Dump gets his elixirs for everything from brain to peenis from Alex Jones.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top