Good point. ECAC players are terrible. If he were on a line with a couple of WCHA guys, he'd have 80 goals by now.
I never said he wasn't a good player. Yeah, I have maroon tinted glasses on, because I get to see Jack Connolly play every day. Not many people get to see that. Does Austin Smith play in the town he grew up? Has he started 156 straight games? Has he been a two time All-American? No, he hasn't. He's a good player in a mediocre conference. He'll be there at the end, but Hobey criterion requires more than just goals. Hobey likes them, but it's not all that matters, and I'm betting we'll see that in April.
No, but if he was on BC, BU or Maine instead of Colgate, I bet he'd still be leading College Hockey in goals...No, cuz I didn't say any of that. What I will say is that the ECAC is in fact terrible. Fact, not opinion. You think he'd have as many goals as he does if Colgate was in Hockey East?
No, but if he was on BC, BU or Maine instead of Colgate, I bet he'd still be leading College Hockey in goals...
He has 32, he only needs 22 to still be leading college hockey...Ya, I just don't agree with that.
No, cuz I didn't say any of that. What I will say is that the ECAC is in fact terrible. Fact, not opinion. You think he'd have as many goals as he does if Colgate was in Hockey East?
Opinion, not fact.
And you're saying he compares less favorably with the best players from other conferences because he plays in the ECAC. But those other players don't play on these "terrible" ECAC teams. If he were in Hockey East (according to you) he'd be playing with much better teammates. You can't have it both ways.
yup, I know... and the second time he faces Union, he is going to have to face their top goalie.
You're clearly an ECAC homer. With only one team in the tournament as of today and no FF reps since Cornell about 10 years ago...the ECAC is terrible. You don't have an argument to counter that.
Now, as for Smith. If COLGATE was in Hockey East, you think he'd have the same amount of goals?
The ECAC is terrible? Tell that to UNH, UMass, Vermont, Merrimack, Providence and Northeastern; all teams that could not beat ECAC opponents this year. In-fact a 10-7-4 record for HE against ECAC competition, I guess from your perspective makes HE an "average" league? Is HE a better league - yes. However, the difference is not as great as you make it - you could make the case that the only difference year-in and year-out is BC/BU and sometimes UNH & Maine. Austin Smith lead Colgate to a 1-0-1 record against HE so far this year with at least a point a game. In 10 contests against non-ECAC competition, he is averaging 1.5 points a game. Regardless of who he plays against, he is extremely productive....I believe he controls his destiny. If he maintains his current performance and can lead Colgate far into the playoffs - he's the favorite!I believe RIT is the only Atlantic Hockey team to reach the FF. The ECAC wants to be considered with the WCHA, CCHA and Hockey East, no? It is by far #4 with no significant tournament results to point to over the past 10 years. I realize you're an ECAC guy, so it's hard for you to accept the fact that your conference is terrible, but it is what it is. But if you want to parse it so "the ECAC just isn't as good as the other three major conferences"...fine. That you can surely agree with.
So now you're bringing up the possibility that if Colgate played in Hockey East, Austin Smith could have 40 goals...exactly double what the leading goal scorer in Hockey East has? And that if UMD was in the ECAC, Connelly could have only 10? Ya, ok...
You are correct though, he does lead the nation in goals.
Austin Smith getting some love from College Hockey Weekly, in their "Hopeful Hobey" discussion...
http://www.collegehockeyweekly.com/Hobey-Hopeful.html
stop being your typical ********* self...You do realize spamming the board with requests to visit your website is a violation of the terms and conditions of this board, correct? Please stop.
I thought this thread was discussing the merits of Austin Smith's Hobey Baker candidacy? Consideration of head-to-head conference play including Colgate's team and Smith's individual performance does matter....regardless of history.Yes, the ECAC is terrible. That's already been established. It's been known for years. Any fan with half a brain would look at more than just one season's REGULAR SEASON results to determine if a conference was good or not. I mean, I could even understand you boasting if the ECAC had a winning record against Hockey East this year...but citing the fact your beloved league has a winning percentage under .500? LOL. Why don't you try looking at the bigger picture, like the national tournament, number of teams in the dance on a yearly basis and the results. When you do that, you'll realize that the ECAC is in fact terrible.
As for Smith, using two games is the epitome of a small sample size.
stop being your typical ********* self...
You do realize spamming the board with requests to visit your website is a violation of the terms and conditions of this board, correct? Please stop.
1. My post was in relation to this thread, and not spam.
2. There was no request to visit the website.
3. I've told you this before, but apparently you can't seem to comprehend it... CollegeHockeyWeekly.com is not my website.
4. Consequently, there was no violation of the terms and conditions of this board.
I was merely posting a link where another website had Austin Smith as their leading candidate for Hobey. If you agree or don't agree with that premise, this is a great thread to discuss that. If you don't like the website...don't go to it.![]()