What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Priceless said:
Is anything she said incorrect?
Click to expand...
I just found out today that insurance companies threw in their support to the insurance bill. Their payment from the Dems for that was the mandatory insurance clause for everyone making over $X.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

St. Clown said:
I just found out today that insurance companies threw in their support to the insurance bill. Their payment from the Dems for that was the mandatory insurance clause for everyone making over $X.
Click to expand...

Huh?:confused:
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Priceless said:
Is anything she said incorrect?
Click to expand...

Given that it was her subjective opinion, and the fact that congress and the insurance companies are jointly trying to reach some agreements on a health plan, the point is that it wasn't exactly the smartest thing for her to say at this time.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Bill said:
Given that it was her subjective opinion, and the fact that congress and the insurance companies are jointly trying to reach some agreements on a health plan, the point is that it wasn't exactly the smartest thing for her to say at this time.
Click to expand...

So nothing she said was incorrect. Thanks.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Priceless said:
So nothing she said was incorrect. Thanks.
Click to expand...
If it makes you feel better, she was incorrect. Can you find some bad apples in any large scale private enterprise, absolutely. That doesn't mean that enterprise as a whole is evil.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Bill said:
If it makes you feel better, she was incorrect. Can you find some bad apples in any large scale private enterprise, absolutely. That doesn't mean that enterprise as a whole is evil.
Click to expand...


Pelosi is just an angry old ****
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Its a pretty broad brush she painted with, I can't imagine most folks feel that way about their health insurance coverage. I would assume some do and probably rightfully so but all?
"Of course they've been immoral all along in how they have treated the people that they insure,"
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Priceless said:
Is anything she said incorrect?
Click to expand...

Statements about morality and villainhood are not testable, so the statements she made were mere opinions which are by definition neither incorrect or correct.

I personally disagree with her, but that's all I can say.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

LynahFan said:
How about you point out the purple statements? You have every bit as much chance of success... :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

He said he could. He hasn't, but he said he could.

I admit I am unable to point out any purple statements. Then again, no one said she made any purple statements, so...
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Priceless said:
He said he could. He hasn't, but he said he could.

I admit I am unable to point out any purple statements. Then again, no one said she made any purple statements, so...
Click to expand...

YOU brought up whether the statements were correct or not in the very first post responding to Bill's. You asked the wrong question and are now crowing that nobody will answer it. Nobody will answer it BECAUSE THERE IS NO ANSWER.

The closest thing Pelosi said to a statement that could be correct or incorrect is her assertion that the insurers are doing "everything" in their power to prevent a public option. Well, if there's a single insurance company that has a single dollar left in its bank account (and I assume you'll so stipulate), then that's a dollar they could have spent trying to defeat the public option. Therefore, they actually haven't done "everything" that they could, and Nancy is incorrect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top