What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

well regardless of whether or not the store brand soda is actually made by pepsi, it costs less for you because there are no advertising costs associated with the product (in fact Pepsi pays for you to come into the store to buy soda in the first place). the analogy you could make to red cloud's argument is how malpractice insurance raises the cost of national products (aka pepsi), while the store brand is unencumbered by extra cost.

otherwise, even if pepsi does sell product under a private label it is to capitalize on the market seeking a low cost option, while many other people will simply continue to buy the more expensive brand name item because they equate that with quality. But I dont see an analogy there - there shouldnt be any quality differences between a govt low cost plan and a private plan. Obama would hope that employers continue to offer their private insurance (or face a penalty if they dont) but he cant ultimately control who ends up in the public option.
Hey, this reminds me, why are my premiums paying for advertising? How does that help pay for my medical treatments?
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Somne thoughts after a very disasterous training class.......

(a) if I am a gazillionaire, why wouldn't I just pay cash for sevices rendered? It's not like I can take the gazillion with me when I die?

(b) As we have discussed, the premiums paid by the young and healthy pay the excess medical costs for the not so healthy. If we want to prevent the system from going broke, don't we need more young, healthy people in the pool? Therefore, should not we procreate at a greater rate than what we are doing now? :D

(c) If the amount paid by payers becomes <= amount paid by users, then do we eventually run into scenarios where government intervention is necessary to balance the equation? To what degree will the citizenry tolerate government intervention?

(d) As Red Cloud mentioned, are we looking at the wrong end of the problem? Should be look at what makes up the total bill for medical services and see what can be reduced?

Actually, I think we've asked more questions here than were asked by the House before they voted.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Well at this point it makes more sense for me to pay out of pocket than pay for insurance and I am not a gazillionaire. If they aren't going to cover even a routine checkup at a network facility what the frick am I paying them for anyways? I can just go to the Now Clinic or Urgent Care and pay less for services when I am sick and just pray nothing bad happens.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Somne thoughts after a very disasterous training class.......

(a) if I am a gazillionaire, why wouldn't I just pay cash for sevices rendered? It's not like I can take the gazillion with me when I die?

(b) As we have discussed, the premiums paid by the young and healthy pay the excess medical costs for the not so healthy. If we want to prevent the system from going broke, don't we need more young, healthy people in the pool? Therefore, should not we procreate at a greater rate than what we are doing now? :D

(c) If the amount paid by payers becomes <= amount paid by users, then do we eventually run into scenarios where government intervention is necessary to balance the equation? To what degree will the citizenry tolerate government intervention?

(d) As Red Cloud mentioned, are we looking at the wrong end of the problem? Should be look at what makes up the total bill for medical services and see what can be reduced?

a) no, but you can leave it to your relatives, hockey program, or myself.

b) that would be the goal, but since conservatives aren't holding up their end of the bargain (which explains why they're so d @mn grumpy all the time ;) )we have secret plans in place to have ACORN legalize all illegal immigrants (or at the very least those inclined to vote Dem :D ) to help with the shortfall on the right....

c) cannibalism ought to solve that problem right quick.

d) Red Cloud often looks at the wrong end of things, which is explained by him having his head up his derriere most of the day. :D (settle down Red Cloud, I'm just kidding).

Hope that helps. :)
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Looks like our faux "health care expert" is in distress.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

What will HR 3200 entail? You decide. The first link is a conservative organization's list of "gems" from the bill that are somewhere on the scale of sketchy to downright alarming.

(I think a disclaimer would be wise: I already know the exact angle the lefties are going to use to discredit the organization's fears - because let's face it, the 80% or so of the world's population that believes in a higher being are delusional and unstable, they could never, ever have any legitimate concerns even if they cited everything down to the page numbers, right? ;) Seriously though, I could care less about the opinions of those people. This post is for people who aren't completely close-minded.)

The second link is the text of HR 3200 itself, all 1000+ pages of it -so you can judge for yourself if HR 3200 is overreaching and invading your private life or not.

http://www.lc.org/media/9980/attachments/healthcare_overview_obama_072909.pdf

www.docs.house.gov/edlabor/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf

Personally, I think it is every good American's job to be very outspoken in being 100% against this very unAmerican trillion-dollar piece of legislation. Insidious, nefarious, irresponsibe, and shades of 1984 are all phrases that come to mind when I think of HR 3200.

Absolutely, we need healthcare reform. But all that's needed is tort reform, not this abomination that Obama and his radical left cronies are trying to force upon Americans against their will.

I'm not even gonna try to read through this thread - so I'm sure some of this has already been said but then again, it's worth repeating. Here's my thoughts, in no particular order.

First of all, in general terms, bureacracies suck at running businesses. Outside of the DC beltway, everyone with half a brain knows the free market is infinitely better at delivering services than government. Amtrak is an inconvenient example of how pathetic of an entrepeneur Uncle Sam is, which is why HR 3200 supporters dismiss it without any intelligent response. And supporters completely ignore failed examples of socialized healthcare schemes in place today. We've all heard how bad Canada's socialized healthcare is. And then there's socialized healthcare in America. 30 to 45 days on average for a veteran to be seen at a VA hospital. 50 to 60 days on average for someone to be seen under the Massachusetts experiment with socialism in the medical field. This is compared to 10 to 12 days for Americans that use the free market system. You need less than half a brain to decide which way is better.

It makes me laugh when supporters mention that America spends far more on healthcare than other countries. It really shows just how foolish supporters of HR 3200 are. So they want to spend well over a trillion dollars on top of what we are already spending? Let me rephrase: Supporters of HR 3200 say we should spend >$1,000,000,000,000 in order to get private sector healthcare costs under control. Someone's a moron here, either me for not understanding that logic or them for using that logic. Can I get some help here please? :rolleyes:

Not to mention the timing of this full court press for socialized healthcae is just downright stupid and irresponsible of Obama. North Korea, Afghanistan, Iraq, the economy, Iran, dependence on foreign oil. There are so many things that healthcare reform should be taking a back seat to. Smarten up, Obama - apply your all-knowing and infinite wisdom to issues that are actually urgent and pressing.

And then you get into the specifics of HR 3200. It's shocking to see just how much those arrogant politicians in Washington look down on people like you and me. While the conservative group whose website I cited may have overly alarmist interpretations on some of the specifics (or quite possibly not), it is quite clear that the cronies down in DC have no respect for the average American's right to make their own medical decisions and show undisguised contempt for the average American's privacy rights.



  • - It isn't clear to me whether or not this bill gives the bureacrats the right or not to take money out of my bank account. It is plain as day though that this bill gives the federal government the right to get realtime snapshots of my financial worth and financial activity. This is outrageous government intrusion. Realtime ability also can help them keep tabs on the general whereabouts of all Americans that use credit and debit cards for most purchases. Shades of 1984, scary.


  • - HR 3200 DOES ration healthcare. Those that deny this are either lying or hopelessly naive. You aren't allowed to make decisions on what and how much treatment you can get. Your doctor doesn't make those decisions either. He goes by a manual written by a team of bureacrats in Washington.


  • - HR 3200 definitely puts the screws to the private sector, and it will probably destroy the private sector in time. Punitive taxes to employers who use the private section, provisions for auto-enrolling Americans onto the socialized healthcare plan when they switch jobs, there's alot of stuff in there that punishes employers and employees who don't embrace Obama's socialized healthcare plan.

Those are just a few gems, and there are so many more.....

But hey. Maybe politicians do know what's best for you and me after all. Maybe we do need socialized healthcare but we're just too stupid to realize it. So it begs the question - if HR 3200 is such a blessing, why are the none of the Congressmen and Senators willing to give up their own government healthcare plan? Hmmmm....

The good news is that the American people were on the ball with this one. Once word got out about the rationing and the government making the healthcare decisions for individual Americans, people started fighting back. Through town hall meetings across the country we're making it clear to those corrupt DC politicians that voting for HR 3200 may well end their political career.

Don't be fooled by the Obama town hall meetings - those were all staged. Go on youtube and look at Obama's town hall meeting in Portsmouth NH. Those questions he was asked couldn't be more sugar-coated if they were packaged in a Krispy Kreme box. That 15-year-old girl with the "mean signs" question was the daughter of Obama activists by the way. Isn't it quite the coincidence that although less than 1/4 of Americans support HR 3200, 100% of the people in that auditorium seemed to support it? How disrespectful to the American people (not to mention cowardly) that this guy packed the auditorium with his supporters instead of letting the average American in.

But I digress. Let that buffoon feel good about himself by insulating himself from us dirty commoners. The Congressman and the Senators are who we need to focus on. I'm telling everyone I see that they would be doing a great service to our country and to each other to take a half hour out of what remains of the summer and call, write, or email your Congressional delegation and tell them to vote against HR 3200. Keep their feet to the fire, and we'll win this one! :)

HR 3200 FUN FACT: Think free market healthcare is expensive? HR 3200 is over 1000 pages long and if enacted, the cost will be over $1 BILLION per page of text.
 
Last edited:
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

So we are supposed to take you seriously as the anger and vitriol drips off your chin...sorry man but you are no better than the supporters of HR 3200 that you so easily denounce and dismiss.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

good show, i love these paranoia documents. i think i have seen 3 with identical wording in chain emails. I stopped reading this one after the first 7 bullets.. maybe i'm reading a different version of the bill (as your link was conveniently broken) but bullets 1, 6, and 7 are just made up and bullets 2, 3, and 4 have been widely debunked already.

i do enjoy being called a bad american for having a diverging opinion, the republican party has lost all touch with the general public and will have a hard time getting back in office which such petty name-calling and vitriol. didnt you learn from the last election that the internet has finally made people too smart for swiftboat tactics?

the other thing i have noticed in all of this, which is basically what cost mccain the election, the republican party stands poised to attack anything that has come from the whitehouse, but has offered no solutions or alternatives on their own. similiar to john mccain's 'i know how to fix the economy, but i'm not going to tell you until i get in office'.

greg, have you heard of medicare?
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

So we are supposed to take you seriously as the anger and vitriol drips off your chin...sorry man but you are no better than the supporters of HR 3200 that you so easily denounce and dismiss.

No. Anyone that displays emotion on such an important issue should be blown off. Every point I made should be disregarded - displaying emotion invalidates everything that would otherwise be valid.

I've in essence said nothing more useful than "F Obama" due to displaying emotion.

The text of HR 3200 should be blown off as well.

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

I've just been thinking about health care so much lately that I'm starting to imagine parallels everywhere. That's why I was asking broadly to the group, is there a parallel there, or did I just create one in my mind?

There is a clear parallel if you're talking about (generic/brand) drugs or softdrink. :)

Basically we're replacing the middle-man from insurance companies to goverment , in theory this should save us $200billion or 20% whatever the insurance companies made in profits per year.

Hmm this would work for banking too,take out the middle-man for large loans and let us borrow directly from the federal reserve bank at 0-1% interest instead of the normal 10%-30% at the bank. :eek:
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

No. Anyone that displays emotion on such an important issue should be blown off. Every point I made should be disregarded - displaying emotion invalidates everything that would otherwise be valid.

I've in essence said nothing more useful than "F Obama" due to displaying emotion.

The text of HR 3200 should be blown off as well.

:rolleyes:


I dont care about the points you made...you invalidated them by whining like a 2 year old about those big bad liberals and how they are ruining your country :p

And get some new bulletpoints...even Faux has moved on from some of them :D
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

I dont care about the points you made...you invalidated them by whining like a 2 year old about those big bad liberals and how they are ruining your country :p

And get some new bulletpoints...even Faux has moved on from some of them :D

I invalidated them about showing some personal emotion about people like you. Thank you. I think that shows that big bad liberals like you hate people who talk about the substance of the matter.

Handyman doesn't like to talk about the substance of HR 3200. The substance of HR 3200 is the only thing that's important in this debate. People like him don't matter to me, I'm trying to reach out to good Americans that are actually williing to talk about the substance of HR 3200. I could care less if Handyman and his type blow me off because I'm angry. Heck yeah, I'm angry about such an abonimation of a bill reaching into my personal life. Only a moron wouldn't be angry.

If you can't talk about the text of the bill, then you are a coward.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

I invalidated them about showing some personal emotion about people like you. Thank you. I think that shows that big bad liberals like you hate people who talk about the substance of the matter.

Handyman doesn't like to talk about the substance of HR 3200. The substance of HR 3200 is the only thing that's important in this debate. People like him don't matter to me, I'm trying to reach out to good Americans that are actually williing to talk about the substance of HR 3200. I could care less if Handyman and his type blow me off because I'm angry. Heck yeah, I'm angry about such an abonimation of a bill reaching into my personal life. Only a moron wouldn't be angry.

If you can't talk about the text of the bill, then you are a coward.

You think I am one of the people you are whining about...are you just kidding around or are you really that stupid? I ask this honestly because your posts are dangerously close to being Glenn Beck like...are you gonna cry too? :p

Why would I want to discuss a bill I don't support? Why would I care to engage with you anyways, someone who obviously isnt going to change their mind or go into any discussion with an open mind? You don't like the bill, that is great you dont have to like it. But I am not going to talk to you just so you can feel validated in your beliefs and can spout off the rhetoric bring something of value to the discussion and be willing to listen to what others have to say or whats the point?

But hey Glenn, if it makes you feel like more of a man to call me a coward and accuse me of being one of the big bad liberals...you go right ahead! :D
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

gregg- You might find that people read past the first few lines if you don't start your post by maligning the people you might want to enlighten. I am not sure I like the bill but anything that starts out by condescendingly insulting people shuts me off. I never made it past the first few lines to see what everyone is all in a twist about.
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

gregg- You might find that people read past the first few lines if you don't start your post by maligning the people you might want to enlighten. I am not sure I like the bill but anything that starts out by condescendingly insulting people shuts me off. I never made it past the first few lines to see what everyone is all in a twist about.

You didn't miss much, just take everything MinnFan, Red Cloud and a few others have said and add in like 20 insults towards liberals and you have it. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if he took his rant straight off of the Faux News web site or Sean Hannity's blog ;)
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

You didn't miss much, just take everything MinnFan, Red Cloud and a few others have said and add in like 20 insults towards liberals and you have it. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if he took his rant straight off of the Faux News web site or Sean Hannity's blog ;)

Kinda funny how the "Faux News" meme rolls on considering MSDNC got caught using video showing the back of a guy from below the neck carrying an AR-15 outside a town hall in Phoenix to launch into a 4 minute discussion on racism in the town hall debates, and a still picture from the Arizona Republic showing the whole guy... turned out to be a black man. Yeah, oops. Forgot to mention that, eh, PMSNBC?
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

Kinda funny how the "Faux News" meme rolls on considering MSDNC got caught using video showing the back of a guy from below the neck carrying an AR-15 outside a town hall in Phoenix to launch into a 4 minute discussion on racism in the town hall debates, and a still picture from the Arizona Republic showing the whole guy... turned out to be a black man. Yeah, oops. Forgot to mention that, eh, PMSNBC?

I don't consider them news either, plus Faux News works better than adding letters to an already annoying acronym ;) They are both sides to the same stupid coin...RILE UP DA BASE FOR DER RADINGS!!!1!111 It is all entertainment and it is all equally annoyings :D
 
Re: America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009 - The USCHO debates

I don't consider them news either, plus Faux News works better than adding letters to an already annoying acronym ;) They are both sides to the same stupid coin...RILE UP DA BASE FOR DER RADINGS!!!1!111 It is all entertainment and it is all equally annoyings :D

Yeah, speaking of ratings... strange how offering an alternative viewpoint from the lockstep state-run media draws viewers. Hmm.
 
No. Anyone that displays emotion on such an important issue should be blown off. Every point I made should be disregarded - displaying emotion invalidates everything that would otherwise be valid.

I've in essence said nothing more useful than "F Obama" due to displaying emotion.

The text of HR 3200 should be blown off as well.

:rolleyes:

You just made his point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top