I had too much time on my hands tonight, so I ran all 32 scenarios on CHN's Pairwise Predictor.
Listed below are each one, with winners placed in order of the respective start times, followed by the resulting .5??? RPI numbers for the last possible at-large teams sweating out the weekend (CC and UMass). Good lord, this is insanely close!! Cornell victory scenarios also list which results push Cornell up to the 12 seed (3 band).
01. Cornell, RIT, BC, Sparty, Omaha............CC 498 > UMASS 496
02. Cornell, RIT, BC, Sparty, Denver............UMASS 497 > CC 493 - CORNELL 12th
03. Cornell, RIT, BC, Michigan, Omaha.........CC 500 > UMASS 499
04. Cornell, RIT, BC, Michigan, Denver.........UMASS 500 > CC 497
05. Cornell, RIT, BU, Sparty, Omaha............CC 498 > UMASS 494
06. Cornell, RIT, BU, Sparty, Denver.............UMASS 495 > CC 494 - CORNELL 12th
07. Cornell, RIT, BU, Michigan, Omaha.........CC 500 > UMASS 497
08. Cornell, RIT, BU, Michigan, Denver..........UMASS 498 > CC 497
09. Cornell, AIC, BC, Sparty, Omaha............CC 499 > UMASS 497
10. Cornell, AIC, BC, Sparty, Denver.............UMASS 498 > CC 495 - CORNELL 12th
11. Cornell, AIC, BC, Michigan, Omaha.........UMASS 501 = CC 501 - (tied RPI!!! Says UMass "wins")
12. Cornell, AIC, BC, Michigan, Denver..........UMASS 502 > CC 497
13. Cornell, AIC, BU, Sparty, Omaha.............CC 499 > UMASS 496 - CORNELL 13th/12th? (tied 522 w/ WMU, but says WMU "wins")
14. Cornell, AIC, BU, Sparty, Denver.............UMASS 497 > CC 495 - CORNELL 12th
15. Cornell, AIC, BU, Michigan, Omaha..........CC 501 > UMASS 500
16. Cornell, AIC, BU, Michigan, Denver..........UMASS 500 > CC 498
17. SLU, RIT, BC, Sparty, Omaha..................CC 498 > UMASS 493
18. SLU, RIT, BC, Sparty, Denver..................UMASS 494 = CC 494 - (tied RPI!!! Says UMass "wins")
19. SLU, RIT, BC, Michigan, Omaha...............CC 500 > UMASS 496
20. SLU, RIT, BC, Michigan, Denver...............CC 497 = UMASS 497 - (tied RPI!!! Says CC "wins")
21. SLU, RIT, BU, Sparty, Omaha..................CC 498 > UMASS 491
22. SLU, RIT, BU, Sparty, Denver..................CC 494 > UMASS 492
23. SLU, RIT, BU, Michigan, Omaha..............CC 500 > UMASS 494
24. SLU, RIT, BU, Michigan, Denver...............CC 497 > UMASS 495
25. SLU, AIC, BC, Sparty, Omaha.................CC 499 > UMASS 494
26. SLU, AIC, BC, Sparty, Denver..................UMASS 495 = CC 495 - (tied RPI!!! Says UMass "wins")
27. SLU, AIC, BC, Michigan, Omaha..............CC 501 > UMASS 498
28. SLU, AIC, BC, Michigan, Denver...............UMASS 499 > CC 498
29. SLU, AIC, BU, Sparty, Omaha..................CC 500 > UMASS 493
30. SLU, AIC, BU, Sparty, Denver..................CC 495 > UMASS 494
31. SLU, AIC, BU, Michigan, Omaha...............CC 501 > UMASS 497
32. SLU, AIC, BU, Michigan, Denver...............CC 498 > UMASS 497
The official tally is in favor of CC, 19-9-4. At a glance, a St. Lawrence victory overwhelmingly favors CC. Meanwhile, UMASS particularly needs both Cornell and Denver to win (that combo equals an 8-0 UMass slant over CC. Actually all 9 decisive UMass wins involve a Denver victory.)
There are a few scenarios where the two teams have an identical RPI, and I don't know where the committee goes from there. How do we decide tiebreakers if RPI is all the comparison criteria they have? In the three scenarios (11, 18 and 26) where UMass "wins", UMass has 2 more total comparisons to CC's (thanks to CC losing comparisons to ASU and Auggie).
However, they are up 2 comparisons total because they were given an arbitrary "win" over CC itself. Points don't get awarded for Common Opp. % if they are identical, so would they drop that UMass/CC comparison due to the tie, and therefore UMass wins by virtue of having 1 more total comparison (instead of 2)?
Reverse UMass's arbitrary win to CC in any of these three scenarios and they're deadlocked at total comparisons again (this is the case in scenario 20, which lists CC as the "winner", with both teams also tied in total comparisons)
Have at it, folks!