I don’t know them by name but in Maine you would have had hundreds of thousands of people unable to vote for their preferred candidate. I think the best part of the decision was it being unanimous. We all need to do our bit for democracy.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
2024 Election Thread
- Thread starter Kepler
- Start date
- Status
I don’t know them by name but in Maine you would have had hundreds of thousands of people unable to vote for their preferred candidate. I think the best part of the decision was it being unanimous. We all need to do our bit for democracy.
French Rage
NICKERSON HAS [CENSORED]
So no one had their ability to vote in all of the races impacted? So voting rights were not impacted?
Also, I would like to vote for my dog. She is my preferred candidate. Am I being oppressed because I cannot vote for her? Or have rules always existed on who can run for what?
Get her on the ballot. She would likely be better than the other candidates.
French Rage
NICKERSON HAS [CENSORED]
So no rules whatsoever on who can run for what have or should have ever existed?
ScoobyDoo
NPC
That's my take from the ruling.
People being ABLE to vote was not what this case was about, and you well know that. People being able to vote for WHOM they wanted to was the issue, but you also know that as well. Now there are NINE supreme court jurists who also believe that a State cant decide this, only Congress can. I guess in this case, you cant spell MAGA without Sotomayor and Jackson.
Probably not the only thing that you would like to do with your dog, but she would be one B!%*# of a candidate.
rufus
rock and roller
You ever hear of 'write-in'?
I wanna vote for my hawt 22 year old neighbor for president. But I can't.
Am I being denied my right to vote?
Why don’t you get off your *** and get her on the ballot?
French Rage
NICKERSON HAS [CENSORED]
Just because it's the only way your mom makes rent doesn't mean everyone else's mind goes there automatically.
French Rage
NICKERSON HAS [CENSORED]
We all know you're comically bad at math, but 22 is less than 35.
rufus
rock and roller
You DO understand there are requirements one must meet to be eligible to run for office? You do know this?
Like, not engaging in insurrection against the US is one of them.
Until the original intent and respect for precedent Supreme Court said "nuh-uh". Which you're thrilled about. Despite "not being a Trump supporter"
But, on the bright side, we won't have to listen to MAGA scum like Texas threatening to bar Biden from the ballot anymore. Wait, who am I kidding. Of course we'll still hear that.
Last edited:
Yeah, dipshiite, I see you understand it so well. Please enlighten us. Start with the fact that NO ONE, NOT A SINGLE PERSON, has been charged with Insurrection. Legal scholars of all stripes seem to agree that if you aren't CHARGED with the specific crime of Insurrection, then you can't be CONVICTED of it. And then sum it all up on how the top 9 jurists voted 9-0 not to agree with you.
YOU DO KNOW THIS?
PS: After you are done with that cupcake, then you can regale us with your fascinating take on write-in names being the path to true democracy.
ericredaxe
Veteran
Chose the republican ballot and filled in the bubble for Haley.
also figured out who were the non maga types for republican committee.
also figured out who were the non maga types for republican committee.
bronconick
Yep, still here
Think it depends on the state
- Status