Fishman'81
Black Bear since D-2
The tournament is a beacon of equity when every eligible conference gets an AQ you halfwit. You don't even realize what you are saying.
So you're saying that a #44 deserves a berth?
"Equity" doesn't translate to "everyone gets to play, regardless of merit"... "Equity" translates to a level playing field via an objective metric; not gifting berths to conferences in an arbitrary manner, you raging poopy-head.
If we must include every fluid construct of a "conference" (and you probably haven't grasped the fact that teams migrate back and forth all the time out here, rendering the notion of a "conference" sorta moot from time to time) then at least award the bid to the respective RS champs on the basis of a much larger sample-size.
Play money-pit D-3 tournaments if you like. I admit that they're fun. But the results of them should carry no more weight than a bit more data-grist for the PW mill. If some team (say Olaf) gets a wild hare up it's ass for 3 games, and still finishes 11-14 , why should they displace a Wilkes, an Oswego or an Endicott? Riddle me that, Einstein.
Very simple, yet not simple enough for you to grasp. Work on that GED, already.