TitleIXHockey
Golden Knight
I know the results have been already been tabulated, but Watts has defeated Zum and Frankel now, should be a no-brainer for Watts.
Unfortunately it's a season award not a 3 random games award
![Stick out tongue :P :P](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png)
I know the results have been already been tabulated, but Watts has defeated Zum and Frankel now, should be a no-brainer for Watts.
Unfortunately it's a season award not a 3 random games award![]()
Only 2 of the games Watts played against MN counted? Or did 3 and the 1 against NE does count? Anyway, ZumBoom is not a factor, it's Watts vs the Sieve. Watts played more games against ranked opponents during the regular season than her competitor from the east. It's going to Frankel, I'm just getting myself hyped up for the rebuttal.
When did the voting take place?
March 11th
Could they possibly give it to Zum as a career recognition without coming out and saying that? Has that ever happened before?
Did any of the schools involved put out a highlite reel of Watts/Zum Boom/Franckel?
Could they possibly give it to Zum as a career recognition without coming out and saying that? Has that ever happened before? If they truly focus on this season, then Zum’s out.
I was on the committee in 2016. The discussion wasn't at all about Coyne's career as a whole. It was that she was the most electrifying player in the game that year. It basically came down to Coyne or Carpenter, who had won the season before and was now the best player on a team with a perfect record. While Carpenter received a lot of help, Coyne did not. So the consensus of the Eastern coaches, and there were a few, was that Coyne was more deserving. And Carpenter had just won, and coaches like to spread recognition around.Yes, when Coyne beat ARD in 2016. ARD had historically great numbers, but Coyne still won. IMHO Coyne and Zum are not in the same stratosphere.
I was on the committee in 2016. The discussion wasn't at all about Coyne's career as a whole. It was that she was the most electrifying player in the game that year. It basically came down to Coyne or Carpenter, who had won the season before and was now the best player on a team with a perfect record. While Carpenter received a lot of help, Coyne did not. So the consensus of the Eastern coaches, and there were a few, was that Coyne was more deserving. And Carpenter had just won, and coaches like to spread recognition around.
Zum didn't get the help Watts did, but I think she got more help than Coyne did in 2016. Anyway, it likely comes down to how Watts decision to transfer is viewed, and how that plays in the leadership column. It isn't a case like Chanda Gunn leaving back in the day, where UW had kind of moved on and left her with little choice but to look elsewhere. That helped with the Kaz committee more than hurt her.But doesn’t what you say here actually suggest Zum should be the favorite to win the award? Like Coyne, Zum didn’t receive the help Watts got from her team and, like Carpenter, Watts has won the award before.
It's hard for a program to win three straight, especially if the program is in decline in the third year. As friendly as the Kaz was to Harvard, even the Crimson never took three straight. Between that and missing games, it was always going to be an uphill climb for Lonergan.I still think that all the cases that can be made for Zumwinkle can be made better for Lonergan, but Lonergan isn't a finalist so...
Perhaps it’s unfair to Zumwinkle but her team was already a 6time NCAA champion when she arrived there, whereas Frankel helped her team
get to new heights (Championship game), depending on how you assess who gets the credit for that team’s ascent. A number of great players descended on NU at once, one might argue, perhaps that is part of Coyne’s legacy.
If moving the needle on where the program is now relative to where it was when you got there is relevant to voters, Frankel has edge.
It's hard for a program to win three straight, especially if the program is in decline in the third year. As friendly as the Kaz was to Harvard, even the Crimson never took three straight. Between that and missing games, it was always going to be an uphill climb for Lonergan.
You're right, although I'm not sure what the character set gyrations did to the poor woman's surname. Anyway, that BC team had a bunch of national team kids, like 70 of them, if TTT is to be believed, which of course, he isn't.Although re: Coyne vs. Carpenter (+Skarupa), Denisa KÅÞová was a lot better than people seem to remember I think.
You're right, although I'm not sure what the character set gyrations did to the poor woman's surname. Anyway, that BC team had a bunch of national team kids, like 70 of them, if TTT is to be believed, which of course, he isn't.
I was on the committee in 2016. The discussion wasn't at all about Coyne's career as a whole. It was that she was the most electrifying player in the game that year. It basically came down to Coyne or Carpenter, who had won the season before and was now the best player on a team with a perfect record. While Carpenter received a lot of help, Coyne did not. So the consensus of the Eastern coaches, and there were a few, was that Coyne was more deserving. And Carpenter had just won, and coaches like to spread recognition around.