What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

I think we all know it's a little more complex than that.

It really isn't. If they want jobs, then they can embrace the modern service economy, instead of digging in their heels and whining that they don't have the same job they did 30 years ago.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

It really isn't. If they want jobs, then they can embrace the modern service economy, instead of digging in their heels and whining that they don't have the same job they did 30 years ago.
The modern service economy pays unlivable wages, doesn't provide adequate healthcare, and has zero opportunity for advancement. That's not a real solution and only serves to maintain the unsustainable status quo.

Attitudes like this literally empower fascism. If Trump is gonna give pie in the sky promises about overturning Washington, taking on Wall St., and bringing back the jobs you mention, then the opponent better at least have some type of similar or better goals and show a basic competency of what the problem is (even Trump managed to do this with NAFTA). Your solution is gonna wind up in a large number of people not taking the effort to vote and at best the dems win in the short term at the expense of the long game.

As much as I give Obama grief on here for his record I do think the guy was an excellent campaigner and his rhetoric was always on point. He said the right things in terms of a more economically just country in which CEO wages aren't skyrocketing at the expense of large swaths of the population and wage stagnation. The recent generations are some of the most highly educated compared to their previous counterparts and yet they're earning less in real wages than the previous ones. Obama recognized this general trend and brought it up a lot in his speeches and SOU Addresses, I wish he would've done more in terms of actual policy to back up the rhetoric but at the very least he knew how to win by saying the right things and pushing the right buttons among the US population for the most part.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

either can my spell checker. :)

and in grammer school we were taught -oes as the plural of potato. Same with tomato.

Remember the jokes? The new (at the time) Air Force One getting fitted with a phony steering wheel so Quayle could pretend he was flying it. :D
 
Remember the jokes? The new (at the time) Air Force One getting fitted with a phony steering wheel so Quayle could pretend he was flying it. :D

There is always flight simulator. Some afffectionados (oes?) have built contraptions that behave like a real flight simulator.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

There is always flight simulator. Some afffectionados (oes?) have built contraptions that behave like a real flight simulator.

I was one of those people, though I never had the fully enclosed setup. I did have the yoke and pedals though (and I would switch to a left-side joystick when simming an Airbus). :)
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

I was one of those people, though I never had the fully enclosed setup. I did have the yoke and pedals though (and I would switch to a left-side joystick when simming an Airbus). :)

I've heard of groups of sim geeks that simulate full airline service, complete with ATC calls and actual arrival/departure schedules.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

I've heard of groups of sim geeks that simulate full airline service, complete with ATC calls and actual arrival/departure schedules.

I did that, too. "Virtual airlines" they are called. And there used to be a MMO server for live "virtual ATC" where they navigated you around weather and other pilots who were online. I can't remember what it was called.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Speaker Pelosi is speaking tonight at the DFL event I'm working. The Progressives seem excited. I will let them know they are a bunch of war mongering Conservadems :)
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Wow brilliant take Politico...
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Typical of centrists: denounce the movements coalescing around leaders like Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn as anti-Semitic, and in the same breath give an unsubtle wink to the idea that Jews are both stingy and rich. <a href="https://t.co/WpkCEmsKy6">https://t.co/WpkCEmsKy6</a></p>— Sen. Mike Gravel (@MikeGravel) <a href="https://twitter.com/MikeGravel/status/1132042506697363457?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">May 24, 2019</a></blockquote>
<script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Does anyone take Politco seriously? I mean anyone with an IQ over 90? Hell one of the few things Rover and Kepler agree on is how pathetic Politico is :D

The question is...why would Anti-Semites rally for Bernie since he is, ya know, a Jew? Doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

Lets not pretend though only "Centrists" are Anti-Semitic. Hating Jews runs the political spectrum and has since forever. The reasons just are different. (see also: Muslims, Blacks, Latinos...etc.)

edit: Politco pulled the tweet but the screenshot is out there. I probably would have avoided the word cheap but it could have been way worse. It ranks up there with the ridiculous Ilhan comments only she has the excuse she is new to her job...Politico is just stupid. ;)
 
Last edited:
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

The point is this is one of the many* centrist outlets that says Ilhan is anti-Semitic despite having zero evidence to support that argument or writing stupid articles about how the left has an anti-semitism problem. And then they hypocritically do something like this.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Does anyone take Politco seriously? I mean anyone with an IQ over 90? Hell one of the few things Rover and Kepler agree on is how pathetic Politico is :D

RCP is the one that's truly awful. Politico is just the usual Galloping Insiderism.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Isnt Politico what Rover affectionately calls "Tiger Beat of the Potomac" or something?
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

The point is this is one of the many* centrist outlets that says Ilhan is anti-Semitic despite having zero evidence to support that argument or writing stupid articles about how the left has an anti-semitism problem. And then they hypocritically do something like this.

Uh huh...her comments are more Anti-Semitic than their cover was. Neither is worthy of being destroyed over but her dog whistling is much more apparent than their wink wink symbolism. I know you arent going to agree with that and that is fine...

Both are rather troubling speaking as a Jewish person. The only reason you rip one over the other is because one aligns more with your beliefs than the other.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Being anti - apartheid state =/= anti-Semitism. And yeah being against Israel’s scumbag policies is against my beliefs where as (actual) antisemitism is so you’re right :D
 
Last edited:
Uh huh...her comments are more Anti-Semitic than their cover was. Neither is worthy of being destroyed over but her dog whistling is much more apparent than their wink wink symbolism. I know you arent going to agree with that and that is fine...

Both are rather troubling speaking as a Jewish person. The only reason you rip one over the other is because one aligns more with your beliefs than the other.

If you haven’t heard your fill of anti-semitism you can go listen to Sebastian gorka at the Minnesota Zoo!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top