What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

And the problem the Democrats have is they cant talk to people. Period end of story. You know why the Blue Collar Workers vote against their interests...because Democrats dont know how to explain to them that is against their interest. (I cant believe I am saying this but) mookie is right. If you cant tell people how what you are doing affects them in terms they will understand they arent going to magically decide to vote for you. They dont even care if you are lying to them they just want to be spoken to.

The fact that 90% of the crap the Dems are on TV for is Trump related really kills them. Get back tot he issues and for God's sakes hire someone who knows how to frame an issue correctly.

If this isn't an advertisement for how awful our education system is in America I don't know what is.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

You act like this stuff all happens in a bubble where the establishment isn't throwing truck loads of money at ****ty conservadems while blacklisting progressive candidates lmao. Or in some cases the DCCC literally told more progressive candidates who ended up winning their primary to drop out altogether while having big wigs from the party give paid speeches for the establishment's pick. Despite all evidence that most dems in this country based on polls are to the left of their representatives.

And then you go "yEaH bUt tHe pRoG cAnDiDaTe dIdN't wIn sTaTewIde" lmfao. And the Justice Democrat/Our Revolution candidates I want to say won 33% of their primaries with maybe 1/100 of the funding going mostly against incumbents who have a built in advantage? So **** off with your disingenuous bull**** that the average high schooler could see through.

So, the answer then is "no". You can't name a trix approved progressive who's won statewide in a swing or red state? Because of some conspiracy which apparently takes away the free will of the progressive candidates and voters? But, NEXT YEAR WILL BE THE YEAR, DA MMIT!!!
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

It's not a conspiracy when you have people on tape like Steny Hoyer literally telling someone they're not the preferred candidate and that they should drop out. The difference in funding from the DCCC is well documented. Nobody is fooled by your moronic schtick lol.

I mean yeah, Lipinski beat his challenger by 2000 votes with the full weight of the party behind him and a huge monetary advantage. You're not gonna convince me that if the roles were reversed the pro-choice woman who's an objectively better candidate couldn't have gained an extra 2000 votes.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

It's not a conspiracy when you have people on tape like Steny Hoyer literally telling someone they're not the preferred candidate and that they should drop out. The difference in funding from the DCCC is well documented. Nobody is fooled by your moronic schtick lol.

There's no way out of this box. The history of Obamacare proves it. Hell, the guy with the "Keep The Government Out of My Medicare" sign proves it. It's hopeless.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

It's not a conspiracy when you have people on tape like Steny Hoyer literally telling someone they're not the preferred candidate and that they should drop out. The difference in funding from the DCCC is well documented. Nobody is fooled by your moronic schtick lol.

Yeah it still is a conspiracy. Look up what the word means. (you are thinking Conspiracy Theory)

And your schtick is no better than his. In fact you are just the Uber Left version of him. It is funny the amount of projecting you both do against each other :D

You can blame the DCCC all you want, and they deserve plenty of it, but the truth is it doesnt matter how much farther left the voters may be going they have to like the candidate as well. The problem with many of the top level Progs is they might appeal to a group or two but the Party is more than just a few groups. If half your platform is railing against the "others" some of whom are part of your voting block you are going to have a problem winning the bigger the scale gets. And like it or not that is what the Progressives sound like to many people a lot of the time. They lack any sense of Pragmatism...

If you want to change things you need to do so from the inside. If you want to get inside you have to win. Otherwise you just stand outside the party saying how unfair everything is but at least you did your best.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

It's not.

Thanks

“The Democratic Party has lost its voice to speak to people that shower after work and not before work,” he said. “All we’re saying is he won’t turn over his tax returns. He’s saying, ‘I’m fighting China to get you better jobs.’”

Oh,yes it is. ****ing morons all around. Clinton used the wrong word. It's not "deplorables". It's idiots. Idiocracy has come to America.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

And the problem the Democrats have is they cant talk to people.

The problem is Democrats can't talk to people who didn't go to college.

That's a serious problem, but let's please not pretend that the uneducated are more "real" than the educated. That's as wrongheaded as the assumption that rural people are more "real" than urban people.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

There's no way out of this box. The history of Obamacare proves it. Hell, the guy with the "Keep The Government Out of My Medicare" sign proves it. It's hopeless.

Then who cares? According to you, trix and Susan Sarandan it is a loss if we are "stuck" with a Democrat anywhere near the middle so screw it lets just quit and enjoy the ride. Hell trix has said it will lead to an even worse fascist style Trumper in the future! Why put in all this effort if the game is already over. Just put in the scrubs and take a knee.

You dont fight a war in one battle, you win one battle and get to the next one.

Rover may be a raving loonbat when he is on a roll but his message isnt that far off. Right now the goal is to get Trump out. Anyone on our side (even Tulsi Gabbard) is better than this guy. The Dems have to win. Once they do that then you worry about the other stuff. Whatever it takes to beat him...
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

The problem is Democrats can't talk to people who didn't go to college.

That's a serious problem, but let's please not pretend that the uneducated are more "real" than the educated. That's as wrongheaded as the assumption that rural people are more "real" than urban people.

My High School Education covers whatever I need to know to read and vote intelligently. My college education has nothing to do with it.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Then who cares? According to you, trix and Susan Sarandan it is a loss if we are "stuck" with a Democrat anywhere near the middle so screw it lets just quit and enjoy the ride. Hell trix has said it will lead to an even worse fascist style Trumper in the future! Why put in all this effort if the game is already over. Just put in the scrubs and take a knee.

You dont fight a war in one battle, you win one battle and get to the next one.

Rover may be a raving loonbat when he is on a roll but his message isnt that far off. Right now the goal is to get Trump out. Anyone on our side (even Tulsi Gabbard) is better than this guy. The Dems have to win. Once they do that then you worry about the other stuff. Whatever it takes to beat him...

Like I posted before. That's what the Obama election was for. Now we've lost another 12 years cause Obama didn't fix the problems and Trump is just making it worse. Lose another 12 years and there won't be a planet left.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

I guess if people think endless war, giving handouts to the financial industry, Saudi Arabia, the military industrial complex, and billionaires, locking children up in cages at the border and being slightly less regressive on immigration than Dump, passing on good popular legislation like M4A in favor of means tested medicare for some with copays and deductibles, no real plan on climate change, being racist and on the wrong side of history on nearly every issue like Biden, and all the other BS the conservadems support is pragmatic, then sure, that's why they're winning. Not the fact that one group is looking for loose change in the sofa for donations and the other is getting millions from fossil fuel, Wall St., and healthcare execs whose sole goal is to have politicians look the other way on every single problem that makes our economy, climate, and healthcare system completely unsustainable.

If you want to change things you need to do so from the inside. If you want to get inside you have to win.
Yes, the insiders like Pelosi who literally told a black person "All lives matter", that medicare for all isn't as good as ACA, and is currently waffling on starting the impeachment process of a president with a 38% approval rating who is blatantly obstructing justice.

Handyman said:
Hell trix has said it will lead to an even worse fascist style Trumper in the future! Why put in all this effort if the game is already over. Just put in the scrubs and take a knee.

You dont fight a war in one battle, you win one battle and get to the next one.
*History repeats itself*

"Gee IDK guys I think it's the dumb voters again!"
 
Last edited:
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

The problem is Democrats can't talk to people who didn't go to college.

That's a serious problem, but let's please not pretend that the uneducated are more "real" than the educated. That's as wrongheaded as the assumption that rural people are more "real" than urban people.

No one said they are. And sorry but that is a classic projection because the only ones pretending people are "more" real are people like you. That is half your schtick around here ;) (and it is how many of the Dems sound when they speak in public)

Everyone is real, the sooner the Dems realize that the sooner they will start winning again. Instead of telling everyone they are stupid, figure out a way to help them understand. Be a teacher...not a guest lecturer.

Look I think people are stupid too...but if I was running for office tomorrow I wouldnt make it seem like half my platform is "hey your beliefs are stupid vote for me I am smart".
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Anyone who thinks a city like Youngstown isn't dead in the water and that people don't need to move on from there or die already, is a moron. Those. Jobs. Are. Not. Coming. Back.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Yes, the insiders like Pelosi who literally told a black person "All lives matter", that medicare for all isn't as good as ACA, and is currently waffling on starting the impeachment process of a president with a 38% approval rating who is blatantly obstructing justice.

She isnt waffling, she doesnt want to do it. Ya know why? BECAUSE IT DOESNT FLIPPING MATTER! He wont be removed from office, and it wont hurt him in the polls. It is a losing proposition and everyone seems to get that but the Che Wing of the party.

Keep railing against Nancy Pelosi...she is a great Speaker of the House and is certainly better than anyone your wing of the Party wanted to put in there.

Your whole post proves my point that you are just Rover with a different platform BTW. I bet you dont even realize it :D Keep it up it is quite entertaining :)
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Like I posted before. That's what the Obama election was for. Now we've lost another 12 years cause Obama didn't fix the problems and Trump is just making it worse. Lose another 12 years and there won't be a planet left.
It's kinda darkly hilarious how terrible the boomer generation is. They'd rather see the planet cook the younger generation than maybe have to pay higher taxes for once in their lives.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

My High School Education covers whatever I need to know to read and vote intelligently. My college education has nothing to do with it.

Then you either slept through college or, worse, are an engineer.

But the point is we should be able to talk to high school grads. And high school drop outs. Liberals are at heart academics so we seem ridiculous trying to change gears and think slower. Cons are at heart salesmen and televangelists, so they have no problem seeing eye to with the rubes, as a wolf does a lamb.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

Anyone who thinks a city like Youngstown isn't dead in the water and that people don't need to move on from there or die already, is a moron. Those. Jobs. Are. Not. Coming. Back.

Where should they move on to? And how will they get there? How will they pay for it? Not everyone gets to travel for a living or has the wherewithal to just up and leave when things get bad.

I agree with you obviously (hence my attacks on Northern Minnesota for the same reasons) but the problem is more nuanced than that too.
 
Re: 2020 Democrat Challengers Part II: There Can Be Only One

She isnt waffling, she doesnt want to do it. Ya know why? BECAUSE IT DOESNT FLIPPING MATTER! He wont be removed from office, and it wont hurt him in the polls. It is a losing proposition and everyone seems to get that but the Che Wing of the party.

Keep railing against Nancy Pelosi...she is a great Speaker of the House and is certainly better than anyone your wing of the Party wanted to put in there.

Your whole post proves my point that you are just Rover with a different platform BTW. I bet you dont even realize it :D Keep it up it is quite entertaining :)
The investigations of Trump that already have been happening have seen his approval rating go down, this isn't hard to understand for everyone except you and Rover who inject the Hill articles into your eyeball.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top