What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2017 Pairwise thread

Re: 2017 Pairwise thread

Today's games didn't close any possibilities, other than the obvious for Michigan and Michigan State. But, Air Force and BC's at-large scenarios became highly restricted--from 29% with a win for Air Force to <1%, and from 22% with a win for BC to 2%.
 
Re: 2017 Pairwise thread

Jim, I think I count only 6144 scenarios left.

4 x 4 x 4 x 4 x 2 x 4 x 3 where the last (x 3) is for the NCHC 3rd place game. Is that correct? And, that doesn't seem nearly as impossible to wade through.
 
Last edited:
Jim, I think I count only 6144 scenarios left.

4 x 4 x 4 x 4 x 2 x 4 x 3 where the last (x 3) is for the NCHC 3rd place game. Is that correct? And, that doesn't seem nearly as impossible to wade through.

I think of there as being 17 games left, 16 of which have 2 possible outcomes and 1 of which has 3 possible outcomes. Or 2^16 * 3 = 196608.
 
Re: 2017 Pairwise thread

To elaborate on the Air Force situation a little here....

The scenarios where they qualify yet as an at-large are exactly as Jim linked, and then these adjustments also work:

It doesn't seem to matter who wins WCHA.
Either Ohio State or Penn State can win Big 10.

But, that's it. AFA has to pass NoDak in RPI, and it's so tight that Minnesota or Wisconsin winning a game raises NoDak's RPI too much or lowers AF's RPI too much.

ECAC and HE have to go exactly the way he wrote.
 
To elaborate on the Air Force situation a little here....

The scenarios where they qualify yet as an at-large are exactly as Jim linked, and then these adjustments also work:

It doesn't seem to matter who wins WCHA.
Either Ohio State or Penn State can win Big 10.

But, that's it. AFA has to pass NoDak in RPI, and it's so tight that Minnesota or Wisconsin winning a game raises NoDak's RPI too much or lowers AF's RPI too much.

ECAC and HE have to go exactly the way he wrote.

Update - You're right. Though they can reach #14 in PWR in 23 of the 190,000 scenarios, they only seem to make the tournament in 4 of those.
 
Last edited:
Re: 2017 Pairwise thread

Excellent! Thanks. Just 1 game left and anywhere from a 1 to a 3 seed.
Also looks to me like if Denver wins in the 3ed place game, they are the overall #1 but if Duluth wins and Denver loses, Duluth will be instead.
I'm also thinking Wisconsin has a good chance at the auto bid because they are reasonably rested.
 
Re: 2017 Pairwise thread

Also looks to me like if Denver wins in the 3ed place game, they are the overall #1 but if Duluth wins and Denver loses, Duluth will be instead.
I'm also thinking Wisconsin has a good chance at the auto bid because they are reasonably rested.

I see you are right, that Denver and Duluth are really very close in RPI today. Is it the case that Western Michigan has to win to stay in the #1 tier? Or else idle Minnesota slides back in?

As an aside, I am thinking that if Denver and Duluth both lose, that Harvard can win and still not go higher than its PWR #3 overall. But it could perhaps pick up more than half the first place poll votes, neither here nor there.
 
Also looks to me like if Denver wins in the 3ed place game, they are the overall #1 but if Duluth wins and Denver loses, Duluth will be instead.
I'm also thinking Wisconsin has a good chance at the auto bid because they are reasonably rested.

DU should tank to stay out of Fargo, that's a death match.

r
 
Back
Top