Just looking at the polls early in the week and I put in my opinion with Harvard ahead of Colgate and dropped down Princeton.
After reviewing again, I still believe that harvard is ahead of Colgate, maybe not Princeton and probably ahead of NDak. If NDak drops both this weekend they shouldn't be in the top 10. They have dropped a lot of games versus lower teams and consistently do it. On the other hand they do pick up points against UM and UW.
Harvard has beaten Colgate twice, Northeastern (one and only game), tied Clarkson, split with Princeton (but beat them last time out), Lost to Q by 2 - 1 (OT) and a 1 - 0 score, lost to BC by a 2 - 0 score (also got slammed by them), beat BU (not ranked) but I'm thinking they are not going to ride off into the sunset very quickly (caution BC). But on the other hand Harvard has also lost/tied to some teams it should have beat, but when they do the scores are close.
My problem is I don't totally understand the rational of the polls at times.
In the end, in the ECAC I still believe that Clarkson and Q will end up in the final. If the top 4 seeded teams make it out of their first round, I see that Princeton would be in tough vs Clarkson but I believe that Harvard could take out Q.
I'll be interested to see the polls after this weekend, especially if UM beats UW again, NDak losses again, Harvard ends up in 4th - ECAC.