USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results
- Thread starter brookyone
- Start date
SCSUhuskies
New member
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results
St. Cloud State drops Game 2 to North Dakota, 3-0.
St. Cloud State drops Game 2 to North Dakota, 3-0.
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results
Final score from AMSOIL Arena: Minnesota 6, Minnesota-Duluth 2
SOG were 50-16.
Scoring for the Gophers in the third was Anna Barlow, her second goal of the season. Katherine McGovern got one with 10 seconds left in the game for UMD.
Final score from AMSOIL Arena: Minnesota 6, Minnesota-Duluth 2
SOG were 50-16.
Scoring for the Gophers in the third was Anna Barlow, her second goal of the season. Katherine McGovern got one with 10 seconds left in the game for UMD.
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results
Union lost 3-0 to Harvard to extend the program's NCAA record winless streak to 49 games. Union has been blanked 16 times this season.
Union has two chances left to avoid finishing the season 0-fer - next weekend at QU and Princeton.
Union lost 3-0 to Harvard to extend the program's NCAA record winless streak to 49 games. Union has been blanked 16 times this season.
Union has two chances left to avoid finishing the season 0-fer - next weekend at QU and Princeton.
robertearle
Well-known member
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results
A question for the collective knowledge of the board:
The third goal by the Badgers in Saturday's game against Mankato was a very quick in-and-out of the net shot that drew an immediate and vocal response from the Mankato bench. But after a couple of replays. it was quite obviously a goal (with nobody anywhere near the crease, and no high-stick deflection, etc).
But the discussion at the Mankato bench lasted rather long; when it was over the refs went to review the video, and the announcer in the building said "The previous play is being challenged".
Not "the goal is under review", like they've said dozens of times; but "... being challenged".
Did the NCAA institute a coach's challenge (that just has never come up before in a game I was watching)? Or did the announcer just word things oddly this time around?
A question for the collective knowledge of the board:
The third goal by the Badgers in Saturday's game against Mankato was a very quick in-and-out of the net shot that drew an immediate and vocal response from the Mankato bench. But after a couple of replays. it was quite obviously a goal (with nobody anywhere near the crease, and no high-stick deflection, etc).
But the discussion at the Mankato bench lasted rather long; when it was over the refs went to review the video, and the announcer in the building said "The previous play is being challenged".
Not "the goal is under review", like they've said dozens of times; but "... being challenged".
Did the NCAA institute a coach's challenge (that just has never come up before in a game I was watching)? Or did the announcer just word things oddly this time around?
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results
==
That was the first time I had seen that situation as well, but I looked it up in the rules and it is covered under section 93.6 Team Timeout Request:
==
93.6 Team Timeout Request -
A team may use its timeout for the purpose of reviewing situations that are in the video replay criteria or a potentially non-detected goal.
In order for a time out to be granted a coach must:
• Identify from the onset of the request that the time out is for purpose of video review.
A coach may not request a video review if the timeout is taken for another purpose.
A coach may not stall in any manner prior to requesting the review.
• Identify the specific video replay criteria requested to be reviewed.
If the challenge is successful, the team retains its timeout. If not overturned, team loses timeout.
==
Looks like the situation was handled correctly.
==
That was the first time I had seen that situation as well, but I looked it up in the rules and it is covered under section 93.6 Team Timeout Request:
==
93.6 Team Timeout Request -
A team may use its timeout for the purpose of reviewing situations that are in the video replay criteria or a potentially non-detected goal.
In order for a time out to be granted a coach must:
• Identify from the onset of the request that the time out is for purpose of video review.
A coach may not request a video review if the timeout is taken for another purpose.
A coach may not stall in any manner prior to requesting the review.
• Identify the specific video replay criteria requested to be reviewed.
If the challenge is successful, the team retains its timeout. If not overturned, team loses timeout.
==
Looks like the situation was handled correctly.
First time I've heard of it.
It would sort of explain why the WCHA officials reviewed a Gopher goal against UMD twice on Friday. They reviewed it, made the call, spoke to UMD's Coach Crowell, and then took another look.
robertearle
Well-known member
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results
Well, waddaya know!
Thanks for the research.
I jokingly said to the person next to me "Does he lose his timeout now?" I did not notice whether the 'timeout remaining' went to zero on the scoreboard.
Well, waddaya know!
Thanks for the research.
I jokingly said to the person next to me "Does he lose his timeout now?" I did not notice whether the 'timeout remaining' went to zero on the scoreboard.
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results
There was a successful challenge by the Penn State men's team in last Saturday's game against the Gophers. There was no arguing that the puck went in cleanly and was immediately ruled good and put up on the scoreboard. However the Penn State equipment manager saw that the Gophers were offside as they entered the zone, and he got the head coach (who was talking to one of his players and did not see the play) to issue a challenge. Sure enough, slow motion replays showed that a Gopher player was definitely offside, just barely by about a half-foot, but of course offside is offside, and it doesn't matter how close it was. The overturning of the goal turned out to be huge, as it negated the go-ahead goal in a game that Penn State eventually came back to win at the end.
First time I had ever seen anything like it; in fact I didn't know the challenge rule even existed.
There was a successful challenge by the Penn State men's team in last Saturday's game against the Gophers. There was no arguing that the puck went in cleanly and was immediately ruled good and put up on the scoreboard. However the Penn State equipment manager saw that the Gophers were offside as they entered the zone, and he got the head coach (who was talking to one of his players and did not see the play) to issue a challenge. Sure enough, slow motion replays showed that a Gopher player was definitely offside, just barely by about a half-foot, but of course offside is offside, and it doesn't matter how close it was. The overturning of the goal turned out to be huge, as it negated the go-ahead goal in a game that Penn State eventually came back to win at the end.
First time I had ever seen anything like it; in fact I didn't know the challenge rule even existed.
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results
I wouldn't bet the mortgage that they manage to come away with anything. You'd have a better chance winning Powerball.
I wouldn't bet the mortgage that they manage to come away with anything. You'd have a better chance winning Powerball.
TonyTheTiger20
#SOAR
Litchfield was a monster -- she had a game like this against us last year too
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results
In the first and 2nd periods it was like BC was on the PP the entire period. They were passing back and forth with very little pressure from Vermont. Anastos had a beautiful tip in front for BC's first goal on a blast from the point from one of their d. One thing that did surprise me was that BC gave up a number of odd man rushes to Vt that led to really great scoring chances that they failed to convert on either by a good save by Burt or missing the net.
In the first and 2nd periods it was like BC was on the PP the entire period. They were passing back and forth with very little pressure from Vermont. Anastos had a beautiful tip in front for BC's first goal on a blast from the point from one of their d. One thing that did surprise me was that BC gave up a number of odd man rushes to Vt that led to really great scoring chances that they failed to convert on either by a good save by Burt or missing the net.
TonyTheTiger20
#SOAR
I did notice this as well -- there were a lot of out-of-character ill-advised passes, particularly in the first. It felt like they cleaned it up after the first 20 minutes or so.
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results
I agree that Union is likely to lose both games and finish the year winless. Their best chance for a win was a couple weeks at Brown, but they settled for a tie after Brown scored an extra attacker goal late in regulation.
Should Union finish with 0 wins, they would be the 1st program in NCAA D1 women's hockey history to do so (records go back to 2000-2001). A few teams finished with one win, most recently Yale in 2011-12.
I agree that Union is likely to lose both games and finish the year winless. Their best chance for a win was a couple weeks at Brown, but they settled for a tie after Brown scored an extra attacker goal late in regulation.
Should Union finish with 0 wins, they would be the 1st program in NCAA D1 women's hockey history to do so (records go back to 2000-2001). A few teams finished with one win, most recently Yale in 2011-12.
Golden Tuuk
Registered User
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results
Goph's up 1-0.
Goph's up 1-0.
FiveHoleFrenzy
Well-known member
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results
Now 2-0 Kessel with the goal. Minnesota appears to be motivated...
Now 2-0 Kessel with the goal. Minnesota appears to be motivated...