What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

BC now with a chance to go 4-4 on the PP...

Somehow, Northeastern was able to kill it off... 3-4 on the PP for BC...
 
Last edited:
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Fun game. Much more along the lines of what I expected BC vs. NU to be like. Coyne was a monster.
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Gophers have a 2-0 lead over Minnesota-Duluth after one. Goals by Schipper and Brandt.
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Gophers up 4-1 middle of the 2nd period. Not to be outdone by bc, Minnesota's PP is 3-3...
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

FiveHoleFrenzy said:
Gophers up 4-1 middle of the 2nd period. Not to be outdone by bc, Minnesota's PP is 3-3...
Click to expand...
Second period ends 4-1. Gophers outshooting the Dawgs 50-14. :eek:They're obviously getting plenty of chances, but are still having some difficulty scoring 5 on 5.
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Final from Duluth:
Minnesota 7, Minnesota-Duluth 3
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Nice win for SCSU but again, the schizophrenic fighting whatchamacallits. Whioux the heck is this team?
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

frozenfeet said:
Unreal ...the more pathetic the team the more pathetic they play!
Click to expand...
I would argue that St. Cloud State is definitely NOT pathetic; in fact they are probably the most improved team in the best conference in the country, at this point in the season. By my count - not including games vs. Wisconsin or Minnesota - but including league shootouts - they are 12-3 in their last 15 games. Not exactly pathetic in my book!
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Penn State shuts out Lindenwood 3-0 on the first of two senior nights (doing all 12 seniors in a single night would be a stretch, apparently), to move into third place in the CHA. That means home ice for the first round of the CHA tournament, if they can keep their place in the standings.
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

D2D said:
I would argue that St. Cloud State is definitely NOT pathetic; in fact they are probably the most improved team in the best conference in the country, at this point in the season. By my count - not including games vs. Wisconsin or Minnesota - but including league shootouts - they are 12-3 in their last 15 games. Not exactly pathetic in my book!
Click to expand...

SCSU could have beat UW if it were not for ARD stopping. They are much improved.
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

TonyTheTiger20 said:
But if the goalie doesn't stop the puck? I dunno, 5 TTT20s would probably have a good chance ;)
Click to expand...

The problem with having negative value is that the more of you there are, the worse off you'll be. You're challenged enough with just one TTT, so you should probably stick with that.
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Gophers up 2-1 over UMD after one. Goal scorers were Pannek and Kessel for Minny, and Cava for Duluth.
 
Re: 2015-2016 Division I Women's Hockey Scores & Results

Now 5-1 after two. Goals by Reilly, Cameranesi and Cameranesi again just 20 seconds later.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top