USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
- Thread starter brookyone
- Start date
- Status
FiveHoleFrenzy
Well-known member
Re: 2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
Harvard with a very good 2nd period and they lead 3-2 after 2 periods.
Harvard with a very good 2nd period and they lead 3-2 after 2 periods.
Last edited:
Re: 2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
Pretty even 2nd period, but Harvard takes a 3-2 lead. Carpenter was given a major penalty for checking, which at best was very questionable - should have been just two IMO. Harvard was able to score just one off of it though, as BC did a nice job killing its last 4 minutes.
Pretty even 2nd period, but Harvard takes a 3-2 lead. Carpenter was given a major penalty for checking, which at best was very questionable - should have been just two IMO. Harvard was able to score just one off of it though, as BC did a nice job killing its last 4 minutes.
Re: 2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
Awful turnover by Harvard led to BC 2nd goal. Also thought Machemayer should have made the save on the 2nd goal. All in all I think it has been a terrific game to watch.
Awful turnover by Harvard led to BC 2nd goal. Also thought Machemayer should have made the save on the 2nd goal. All in all I think it has been a terrific game to watch.
FiveHoleFrenzy
Well-known member
Re: 2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
It was a good snipe from Skarupa on the 2nd BC goal. Maschmeyer should have stopped the first BC goal, however.
It was a good snipe from Skarupa on the 2nd BC goal. Maschmeyer should have stopped the first BC goal, however.
Last edited:
Re: 2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
I thought the first BC goal may have been deflected off a Harvard players stick. We agree to disagree.
I thought the first BC goal may have been deflected off a Harvard players stick. We agree to disagree.
Hux
Alfond to Ridder & rinks in between
It looked to me like the puck deflected off the D's calf.
FiveHoleFrenzy
Well-known member
Re: 2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
Ding dong the witch is dead...
3-2 final for Harvard.
Ding dong the witch is dead...
3-2 final for Harvard.
FiveHoleFrenzy
Well-known member
Re: 2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
I think BC fans will have some questions and comments about the officiating.
I think BC fans will have some questions and comments about the officiating.
Re: 2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
Not too much - should have been a two, not a five IMO
Mistake on the icing call at the end. (probably not a factor)
I thought the rest was pretty fair
Not too much - should have been a two, not a five IMO
Mistake on the icing call at the end. (probably not a factor)
I thought the rest was pretty fair
hkypassion
New member
Re: 2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
Thought Harvard did a fantastic job blocking shots and clogging the middle. Few untimely sloppy passes from BC didn't help them either.
Thought Harvard did a fantastic job blocking shots and clogging the middle. Few untimely sloppy passes from BC didn't help them either.
Re: 2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
Seriously? Six power plays and you want to question the fairness of the officiating? For the record, Harvard had a five minute major called on one of our players on Saturday when Haley Mullins accidentally bumped a Brown player. Officiating is all over the map in the East and I don't think any team is getting any preferential treatment. We've had more than our fair share of calls go against us this year.
Seriously? Six power plays and you want to question the fairness of the officiating? For the record, Harvard had a five minute major called on one of our players on Saturday when Haley Mullins accidentally bumped a Brown player. Officiating is all over the map in the East and I don't think any team is getting any preferential treatment. We've had more than our fair share of calls go against us this year.
FiveHoleFrenzy
Well-known member
Re: 2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
I was thinking more of the 2 checking calls on Harvard that could have been 5 minutes based on what was called on Carpenter.
I was thinking more of the 2 checking calls on Harvard that could have been 5 minutes based on what was called on Carpenter.
ARM
Fan of chipmunk-like mascots.
Re: 2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
I half expected the even-up call immediately after the Carpenter penalty on the first player for Harvard that came with two feet of an Eagle -- especially after the Crimson scored so early in the PP.
FiveHoleFrenzy
Well-known member
Re: 2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
I'm not questioning it as I was more than happy to see "bc" defeated. Just thought it curious that Carpenter got 5 and 1 or 2 checking calls on Harvard could have been called 5 minutes.
I'm not questioning it as I was more than happy to see "bc" defeated. Just thought it curious that Carpenter got 5 and 1 or 2 checking calls on Harvard could have been called 5 minutes.
Re: 2014-2015 Division I Scores & Results Thread
I would argue that Carpenter's check was more flagrant, with an obvious extra shove from the arm/elbow, but it still was not deserving of a 5...nor were either of the two Harvard checks.
FiveHoleFrenzy
Well-known member
- Status