The annual argument is here, and it's sounding more and more like a waste of time to discuss it.
It's all about the AQ-situation in D-3, and it always has been... At least 2 unworthy teams have been awarded berths this year (maybe more), and that's why Hobart is staying home. The field is far too small to award AQs to mediocre teams, clearly, if the NCAA aspires to be "fair".
(Some posters here state that a true champion must win it's silly little conference-tournament to validate it's entire season, then they change their tune when that doesn't happen... That's not worth mentioning, really, but I couldn't help myself.)
If the field was chosen on merit alone, and in some equitable manner, UMD and Wentworth would be teeing them up about now, and Hobart would be practicing for an upcoming game... Platty, Babson, Bowdoin and Neumann would've been the finalists for the last few berths, IMO.