What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2013-2014 Schedules

Re: 2013-2014 Schedules

I believe the Conn. College game was originally a home game..... So, there's that to think about.
 
Re: 2013-2014 Schedules

bakdraft21 said:
Adrian coming in for 2 should be interesting,Buff St should have a good squad,and have known to be chippy at times,should be fun
Click to expand...
Adrian can play that game too...S/B very interesting in game 2, if the teams get chippy in the opener!!
 
Re: 2013-2014 Schedules

The end of the NCHA conference schedule is going to be awesome.

I am glad SNC is throwing some WIAC teams a bone though to help them (the WIAC schools) keep that S.O.S. up. :D
 
Re: 2013-2014 Schedules

altazo said:
I heard they're trying to tone down that outrageous SOS...
Click to expand...

Do you, or does anyone else, care to make a logical case against Utica's overall SOS-rating in recent years..?

Still haven't seen that, despite all you guys' endlessly petty sniping that is completely devoid of any meaningful content.

Please, please, dry-up, guys, unless you can somehow devise a case to make. (You can't, BTW.)

It's getting beyond tiresome to hear you sycophants parroting each other, without any of you having a leg to stand on regarding this point.
 
Last edited:
Fishman'81 said:
Do you, or does anyone else, care to make a logical case against Utica's overall SOS-rating in recent years..?

Still haven't seen that, despite all you guys' endlessly petty sniping that is completely devoid of any meaningful content.

Please, please, dry-up, guys, unless you can somehow devise a case to make. (You can't, BTW.)

It's getting beyond tiresome to hear you sycophants parroting each other, without any of you having a leg to stand on regarding this point.
Click to expand...

We have, several times. But just for good measure.

*By decent teams I mean Top 20-25 (legit)

Team A plays 10 NC games
-4 Games against decent teams
- Goes 1-3 vs them
- But overall NC 5-5-0

Team B plays 10 NC games
-2 games against decent teams
- Goes 1-1
- But overall 8-1-1

Team C plays 10 NC games
-3 Games against decent teams
- Goes 0-3
- But goes 7-3

Team D plays 10 NC games
-3 Games against decent teams
- Goes 0-3
- But goes 5-4-1

Team E plays 9 NC games
-1 Game againat a decent team
-Goes 1-0
- But goes 7-0-2

Teams A,B,C,D,and E play each other 3 times(which is more then the normal 2). While league W-L-T records are a wash, the all benifit greatly from each others WEAK NC schedules playing 75% against teams they should win against of which they did 85% of the time boosting their overall records up,thus their SOS as well.
 
Re: 2013-2014 Schedules

Interesting argument.

While it's encouraging to see that you know the alphabet through the five first letters, your post seemed to boil-down to an empty pot.

Utica has nothing to prove in terms of scheduling. They play a brutal schedule- even on the road- simply due to being in the W.

Throw Oswego in there as salt on the wound, and it's simply ridiculous to keep doing what you're doing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top