What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Interesting tidbit. In all three debates the moderators have given the Democrats more time than the Republicans. Shocking, I know.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Perhaps we need to go to the 2004 format. Two minutes each side, 30 seconds each side for any added banter, use the three lights if you want, at 10 seconds over time you ring a buzzer.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Nice to see Bob waive the surrender flag on how Romney will pay for additional 7T hole in budget his stated policies will cause.

I believe Obama got a couple more minutes but Mittens said more words so its all even. Are we back on the biased moderator theme again? What happened to that oil lease thing?
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Rover said:
Nice to see Bob waive the surrender flag on how Romney will pay for additional 7T hole in budget his stated policies will cause.

I believe Obama got a couple more minutes but Mittens said more words so its all even. Are we back on the biased moderator theme again? What happened to that oil lease thing?
Click to expand...

1. Bias. No question about it. Moderator was out to get Mitt Romney. After all she picked a question about his TAX POLICY. The horror.
2. Obama has shutdown the oil lease business. Shut it down.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Bob Gray said:
Keep spouting Obama's talking points Mr. "I'm no supporter of Obama and don't vote for him"
Click to expand...

Let's be fair here. If what Mitt Romney says is preposterous, you don't have to be a fan of Obama to call Romney out on it. I'm going to take Scooby's word that he didn't vote for Obama.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Rover said:
Nice to see Bob waive the surrender flag on how Romney will pay for additional 7T hole in budget his stated policies will cause.

I believe Obama got a couple more minutes but Mittens said more words so its all even. Are we back on the biased moderator theme again? What happened to that oil lease thing?
Click to expand...
Yawn.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

dxmnkd316 said:
Let's be fair here. If what Mitt Romney says is preposterous, you don't have to be a fan of Obama to call Romney out on it. I'm going to take Scooby's word that he didn't vote for Obama.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't have a problem with Scooby taking issue with Romney so vehemently if he wasn't a serial apologist for Obama and not call out Obama for numbers that don't remotely make sense or line up either. It's rank hypocrisy to call out one candidate for an issue, but not the other when the other has four years of proven track record of not having numbers remotely line up and whose numbers going forward aren't any better.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Bob Gray said:
I wouldn't have a problem with Scooby taking issue with Romney so vehemently if he wasn't a serial apologist for Obama and not call out Obama for numbers that don't remotely make sense or line up either. It's rank hypocrisy to call out one candidate for an issue, but not the other when the other has four years of proven track record of not having numbers remotely line up and whose numbers going forward aren't any better.
Click to expand...

Obama offered 10 to 1. Boner and Mitch the ***** turned him down. What else would you like him to do all by himself?
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

ScoobyDoo said:
Obama offered 10 to 1. Boner and Mitch the ***** turned him down. What else would you like him to do all by himself?
Click to expand...
Which has what to do with Obama's four years of deficits? All those proposals were primarily cutting well down the road with plenty of time for future presidents and congresses to reverse it. At least you don't contest that you are a serial apologist for Obama. Just own up to it. It amazes me that people like you won't concede the most basic things about the politician you're supporting, while finding those very problems with the other candidate. Romney's numbers don't line up going forward, and Obama has presided over numbers that don't line up and would have four more years of numbers that wouldn't line up. Is that so hard to say both have number issues? Sheesh. You'd argue the sun rises in the west if Obama said so.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Bob Gray said:
Which has what to do with Obama's four years of deficits? All those proposals were primarily cutting well down the road with plenty of time for future presidents and congresses to reverse it. At least you don't contest that you are a serial apologist for Obama. Just own up to it. It amazes me that people like you won't concede the most basic things about the politician you're supporting, while finding those very problems with the other candidate. Romney's numbers don't line up going forward, and Obama has presided over numbers that don't line up and would have four more years of numbers that wouldn't line up. Is that so hard to say both have number issues? Sheesh. You'd argue the sun rises in the west if Obama said so.
Click to expand...

You're arguing lunacy. The economy was in the toilet when Obama took office. The standard operating procedure for any government is to spend your way out of the abyss. Even your blessed conservatives approved that spending (most of it before Bush left office). But, you go ahead and blame Obama for all of it.

Obama isn't nor ever has promised 8 Trillion dollars in spending. That's just a fact. You want the lesser of two evils you're picking the wrong horse.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

ScoobyDoo said:
You're arguing lunacy. The economy was in the toilet when Obama took office. The standard operating procedure for any government is to spend your way out of the abyss. Even your blessed conservatives approved that spending (most of it before Bush left office). But, you go ahead and blame Obama for all of it.

Obama isn't nor ever has promised 8 Trillion dollars in spending. That's just a fact. You want the lesser of two evils you're picking the wrong horse.
Click to expand...
Standard operating procedure in your mind. So if it weren't for the conservatives who had no control the first two years before midterm elections, poor Obama would have controlled that spending. You are hilarious. Do you really believe any of this stuff you post on here? Oh, and way to continue sticking to Obama's talking points.
 
Re: 2012 Presidential Election Part 4

Bob Gray said:
Standard operating procedure in your mind. So if it weren't for the conservatives who had no control the first two years before midterm elections, poor Obama would have controlled that spending. You are hilarious. Do you really believe any of this stuff you post on here? Oh, and way to continue sticking to Obama's talking points.
Click to expand...

You must have missed the chart that ExileOnDaytonStreet posted below. Obama is not the spending fiend that you think he is. Given the circumstances and knowing how much the GOP loves to spend money I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that McCain would have more debt right now than Obama does. History tells us as much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top