What's new
By:
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

Excellent start to the season, boys. Sure, it was just an exhibition game against a bunch of 17 year olds, but let's not focus on that. Vermont hockey is back, and I, for one, am very excited!
 
Last edited:
Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

I was trying to be optomistic that last year was an aberration in an otherwise upward trendline for this program but that exhibition performance was not impressive and historically when we can't beat an exhibition team the year that follows is usually happless.

Yeah I should not overreact to one bad game after two weeks of practice but they got:
outhustled - lost basically every race to a loose puck and the high schoolers were backchecking and stick checking while the Catamounts were not
outmuscled - lost every battle in the corners or scrum
outskated - the high schoolers were much faster with many more odd man rushes blowing by Catamounts at times
outefforted - the high schoolers blocked 15 UVM shot attempts

UVM's power play looks like it always does - completely ineffective. One seeing eye shot got through a moving screen, otherwise they had one other good chance in about 18 minutes of power play time. Pathetic.

I can't say that I was impressed with even one Catamount. Nobody looked strong, skilled and ready to carry the load in a D1 schedule. Yeah, the defense did not look terrible, but it certainly did not look good. There was no offense. Way too much puckhogging with open skaters not being passed to, and when they did pass it was usually not tape to tape with many bad passes behind skates. And don't tell me that the lack of McCarthy, Roos and Marshall mattered against a team that got outscored 8 to 0 last weekend in two games versus D1 opponents. I bet Plattsburgh beats them tonight in fact.

I'm not sure why this is happening but ever since Willie Mitchell left its been downhill. If they don't improve dramatically on every measure I don't see them even threatening to be a .500 team this year and if they put up efforts like last nights against a D1 opponent there won't be many close games.

The upside is that it won't be difficult to get out of the parking lot.
 
Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

snwbrdr said:
I was trying to be optomistic that last year was an aberration in an otherwise upward trendline for this program but that exhibition performance was not impressive and historically when we can't beat an exhibition team the year that follows is usually happless.

Yeah I should not overreact to one bad game after two weeks of practice but they got:
outhustled - lost basically every race to a loose puck and the high schoolers were backchecking and stick checking while the Catamounts were not
outmuscled - lost every battle in the corners or scrum
outskated - the high schoolers were much faster with many more odd man rushes blowing by Catamounts at times
outefforted - the high schoolers blocked 15 UVM shot attempts

UVM's power play looks like it always does - completely ineffective. One seeing eye shot got through a moving screen, otherwise they had one other good chance in about 18 minutes of power play time. Pathetic.

I can't say that I was impressed with even one Catamount. Nobody looked strong, skilled and ready to carry the load in a D1 schedule. Yeah, the defense did not look terrible, but it certainly did not look good. There was no offense. Way too much puckhogging with open skaters not being passed to, and when they did pass it was usually not tape to tape with many bad passes behind skates. And don't tell me that the lack of McCarthy, Roos and Marshall mattered against a team that got outscored 8 to 0 last weekend in two games versus D1 opponents. I bet Plattsburgh beats them tonight in fact.

I'm not sure why this is happening but ever since Willie Mitchell left its been downhill. If they don't improve dramatically on every measure I don't see them even threatening to be a .500 team this year and if they put up efforts like last nights against a D1 opponent there won't be many close games.

The upside is that it won't be difficult to get out of the parking lot.
Click to expand...

Having 3 of your top six forwards out absoultely matters. It changes everything and the roles that everyone has. You just make a blanket statement like those three don't matter. McCarthy is your 1 or 2 top forward and he and Stalberg have absolute chemistry. Marshall is your most dynamic skater. Roos is guy who matters in area's 1 & 2 of your complaints. One of your top six might not matter, but 50% of your top forwards matter. It changes matchups. Still not a great loss but lets not get crazy, they are also VERY young. They also rolled every line in every situation. I am sure Sneddon wanted to see things as the roster has added alot of new faces and you have to put kids in situtations to see what you have. You can't replicate those situations in practice.
 
Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

Marshall is really fast and Roos battles, but if they are top six forwards on this team then I stand by my assertions of concern for a season with no lines to exit the parking garage. I was thinking that Roos is 4th line and Marshall has difficult cracking the lineup given his 3 year lack of offensive production and the increased headcount at forward. I think you need to give Montagna, Mountain, and Markinson all chances to play and show what they can do before you keep hoping Marshall shows something. Either that or you need to sit Lenz or Decenzo which seems less likely.

In the end I think we have a lot of guys that are 4th line material on a good team and we are lacking in puckhandling and scoring among the forwards.

projected lines:
Stalberg, McCarthy, Brickley
White, Reynolds, Bruneteau
Lenz, Markinson, Roos,
Leonard, Decenzo, Montagna

I had much higher expectations than what I saw on the ice friday night, that was similar to watching the Red Sox fold in September.
 
Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

I agree we have the deepest fourth line. Thats why i think missing McCarthy (1st line), Marshall. (2nd line), Roos (2nd-3rd line) was important last night. I guess my expectations weren't as high to start but I think we will improve.
 
Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

I see that none of the other few followers of this thread even feel well enough after last nights depressing performance to even bring themselves to log in and comment on this fine Saturday. I would be curious to hear others comments........

Sneddon was rather positive in his postgame comments, but what else can he do? He can't come out and say "yeah we look terrible, we just got beat by a bunch of 17 year olds after two weeks of practicing and yeah we are going to struggle to win 5 games this year". He has to keep it positive in hopes that it all comes together into a competitive unit. However, the lack of effort and execution last night leaves a lot of concern for everyone with two eyes and a brain.
 
Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

snwbrdr said:
I see that none of the other few followers of this thread even feel well enough after last nights depressing performance to even bring themselves to log in and comment on this fine Saturday. I would be curious to hear others comments........

Sneddon was rather positive in his postgame comments, but what else can he do? He can't come out and say "yeah we look terrible, we just got beat by a bunch of 17 year olds after two weeks of practicing and yeah we are going to struggle to win 5 games this year". He has to keep it positive in hopes that it all comes together into a competitive unit. However, the lack of effort and execution last night leaves a lot of concern for everyone with two eyes and a brain.
Click to expand...
I don't think you can get too despondent. Sure, it wasn't what any of us were hoping for, but it was our first time on the ice this year, it was an exhibition, and we weren't at full strength. Not to mention, we seemed to have carried over that annoying habit from the last several years of playing exceptionally poor in games we're supposed to win. We'll have a much better indication of where we stand after next weekend. Although it might not be pretty, I wouldn't be surprised to see us take a game. I'm someone that can get kinda down on the team when they're not playing well. I'm not there yet after last night.
 
Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

The only thing I can say that troubled me from Friday's game was Alex's cheapie. That won't earn him playing time. Other than that, I was kind of hard to judge, as the ref's were calling every ticky tack thing. The cross check on call on Doerring was a joke. He was skating to the bench for a line change, and the USA player just stopped, blocking his way to the bench. He just shoved him out of the way, and got called for cross checking! No flow at all to the game. We will better idea after the road trip.
 
Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

Why do you even go Snowboarder? I never understand why people can be so negative about how well a bunch of KIDS play a GAME.

Should we be thrilled? Of course not but lets put to much into one game that had 8 or so nubbies playing.

To me the team showed great speed and dominated on faceoffs, and yes the refs killed any flow by throwing thier arms up at every
bump and shove. And yes they stunk both ways.

The shot selection was not good at even strength or PP, but the lines have yet to be set with McCarthy and Roos out and that mixed things up and sorry HockeyGuy but i dont see Marshall playing much more than 4th line and thats not even a given.

2 Players that showed the best together and made a few nice pass plays were Stalburg and Reynolds, would like to see them together for a game or two because they seemed to be on the same page.
 
Brenthoven said:
Hi guys!

We're waiting. ;)
Click to expand...

I believe this is the first time our programs have met, correct? And if I recall, don't we go out to Vermont next year? That would be a fun trip. Anyone from the Vermont fan base planning to make the trip to Minny? We should get a thread started for this series.
 
Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

McCarthy not being on the ice is huge, he will be a first liner all season as long as he doesn't get in trouble or something to that effect. Roos I see as the weakest of them all. Marshall has been dismal on the score sheet, but I do see him playing a significant amount of ice time. The kid has great speed and skating, why he can't score I still can't figure out. But, he does provide an ability to get the puck up ice and he is a senior that could be good linemate with some of the frosh that have a scoring touch...say Reynolds. Maybe not, but I think Marshall could be the guy who steps up and surprises this year.
 
Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

Marshall is a player who looks so good coming thru center-ice but when he gets across the blueline he
doesnt seem to have the skill to finish a play. You look at this guy who has size and speed and you keep
thinking each year this could be the year he takes the next step, but by the end of the year no matter how
much ice time he gets it all looks the same. He was however one of the better PK players last year and that might
keep him in the lineup if his scoring doesnt.
 
Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

Awesome...Both games are on NESN this weekend.

I didnt know NESN did college hockey games that didnt include either BC or BU.
 
Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

Cat lover said:
Awesome...Both games are on NESN this weekend.

I didnt know NESN did college hockey games that didnt include either BC or BU.
Click to expand...
Bummer, I don't get NESN on Comcast here in Atlanta.

BTW, Notre Dame's new arena looks sweet. Exactly what we need.
 
Re: 2011-12 Vermont Season Thread (Vezina & Conn Smyth trophy edition)

SanTropez said:
The Sunday game will be on Fox College Sports Atlantic if you have that station.
Click to expand...
Thanks, but that won't do it either. I'm trying to switch to ATT U-Verse by Friday. They don't have NESN either, but they at least have Fox Sports North.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top