Re: 2010-2011 Patty Kazmaier Thread: FINAL THREE Agosta, Duggan, Stack
Re: 2010-2011 Patty Kazmaier Thread: FINAL THREE Agosta, Duggan, Stack
Kudo's to all Top 3 Finalists. I have spent sometime looking at the overall stats after reading some of the posts here. Here is what I have to say. Most people didn't even look at Stack as a top 3 finalist (including myself) I thought it would be Agosta, Duggan and Knight based on points alone. But after studying the statistics it has lead me to believe that Stack has had the greatest impact on her team overall. If Stack did not play for BC they would not even be a 500 team. Here are some staggering stats IMO. Just food for thought but they are amazing stats when you look at the big picture.
Number of Players on each team in the top 50 in scoring:
Wiso: 5 Mercyhurst: 7 BC: 2
Goals Scored By Team:
Wiso: 203 Mercyhurst: 175 BC: 100 (I mean Stack has scored 1/3 of her teams goals!!!) I believe if BC had 1 or 2 more players in the top 50 that Stacks points would be through the roof in both goals and assists.
In Power Play % - Wisco and Mercyhurst are 1 and 2 while BC is 15.
Scoring Offense - Wisco 1@ 5.34, Mercyhurst 2@ 5.21 and BC 12@2.86
Duggan has played 5 more games than Agosta and 4 more than Stack.
Almost all of BC's games have been a goal differential of 1 to 2 goals the most being 4 once I believe. While both Mercyhurst and Wisco have had large goal differentials. Wisco beating teams by 10 at least 2 maybe 3 times.
Then there is the argument of the difficulty in league play, and strength of schedule. Everyone will have their opinion here. I think it speaks for itself. I will leave that for another post.
All are tremendous players but Stack to me has made the biggest impact to her team. In fact the statistics blew me away today. Congrats to all 3 Finalist.
Looking forward to some great hockey this weekend in Boston.
"the Patty Kazmaier Memorial Award is presented annually to the top player in NCAA Division I women’s ice hockey. Other selection criteria include outstanding individual and team skills, sportsmanship, performance in the clutch,
personal character, competitiveness and a love of hockey. Consideration is also given to academic achievement and civic involvement."
this is not a "best impact for her team" award. it is the best player (on and off the ice) in D1 womens hockey. Put Stack in the WCHA and see what imact she would have against top talent. Frankly, i imagined that past indiscretions (see above bolded text in description) would have and should have removed a player from such a momentous award because while the best hockey players deserve it, the best players who are also great students, leaders and community advocates deserve it more. i'm incredibly surprised to not see Knight in this top 3. or even Schaus / Fortino before Stack.
Either way, its clear that this is a two-person race at this point so theres not much use in arguing the above point. For pure hockey skills, the race is very close. Agost is the best goal scorer in the country and is an amazing offensive talent, there is no arguing that (until Knight takes that crown). However, Duggan's well rounded, unselfish play in both the offensive and defensive zones give her a slight edge IMO.
Because their offensive on-ice talents are so close, the difference-maker will come down to the intangibles. namely Sportsmanship, leadership, and other important off-ice talents. Its no surprise that Wisco suffered drastically without Johnson, Knight and Duggan last year. And Wisconsin players, coaches and administration has made no secret of the fact that the return of Duggan's leadership was the key ingredient in going from a 2009 team that missed the playoffs, to the best team in the country in 2010.