What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

122 Franchises Ranked Bottom to Top:

This is true, most MLB played around with the nicknames during the dead ball era.

The Yankees did start off as the Baltimore Orioles, New York was blocked from entering the American League thanks to John McGraw and the New York Giants. A deal was made before the 1903 to move the team to New York. As the Highlanders, they played at Hilltop Park which was the highest elevation in Manhattan. The media still referred to the team as the Yanks, because it was easier on the eyes than Highlanders. In 1913, the team moved to the Polo Grounds, hence the Highlander name was irrelevant and Yankees became official.

I thought newspapers used Yanks because the shorter name was easier for headlines.
 
Re: 122 Franchises Ranked Bottom to Top:

All kidding aside, someone once pointed out to me how people in early photographs never smiled. And he’s right. Heck, just look at your old, old family photos from the early 1900s. I bet nobody is smiling in them. All serious faces. It’s just the way they posed back then.

while smile when you had no black friends to hang with :(
 
Re: 122 Franchises Ranked Bottom to Top:

The Yankees would have been #2 if not for the fortune of facing the Twins in the playoffs eleventeen times the past decade+.
 
Re: 122 Franchises Ranked Bottom to Top:

All kidding aside, someone once pointed out to me how people in early photographs never smiled. And he’s right. Heck, just look at your old, old family photos from the early 1900s. I bet nobody is smiling in them. All serious faces. It’s just the way they posed back then.

I thought that people didn't smile in old photos because long exposure times were needed.
 
Re: 122 Franchises Ranked Bottom to Top:

I've read that it was because the traditional picture before that was the portrait painting, in which very few smiled.

I've understood this to be the bigger reason as exposure times were greatly reduced by the mid- to late 1800's making that reason mostly obsolete.
 
Back
Top