rufus
rock and roller
but they're probably black. So it's no big deal.
Gotta cull the herd. The darkies, the old farts, and the poor are a good place to start.
USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
Covfefe-19 The 12th Part: The Only Thing Worse Than This New Board Is TrumpVirus2020
- Thread starter Handyman
- Start date
- Status
but they're probably black. So it's no big deal.
Gotta cull the herd. The darkies, the old farts, and the poor are a good place to start.
Jimjamesak
Already insane, UAA making it worse
That gif gets better every time I see it...
Re: Pelosi.
1. Security camera footage, leaked why, for what purpose?
2. Vid I saw was her moving from one chair to another. Obviously just had hair washed. Wear mask when washed?
3. Closed salon. News flash. Most politicians and celebs go outside normal hours.
Other then a day early, no big deal. Also, glad to see the trumpettes care about masks now...,...
1. Security camera footage, leaked why, for what purpose?
2. Vid I saw was her moving from one chair to another. Obviously just had hair washed. Wear mask when washed?
3. Closed salon. News flash. Most politicians and celebs go outside normal hours.
Other then a day early, no big deal. Also, glad to see the trumpettes care about masks now...,...
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
The best part is the supposedly the owner who set this all up blames Pelosi for being shut down (it was Newsome) and they never shut down anyways they had been running against orders the whole time. Some rumors suggest that the owner also asked their workers to not follow the protocols.
But yeah Nancy is the problem.
They want you to believe that her not wearing a mask proves the hoax. That is the whole point of this. Just like with the athletes they all of a sudden care about the minute details of a study and how apparently athletes get myocarditis regularly. (that is legit what people are saying...including the media types who are pissed they should be playing)
les,
I assume this is the type of stuff that got the Big Ten and Pac-12 to cancel immediately? I remember when the story of the heart problems popped up and the Big Ten got scared fast but never really explained why. (leaked some numbers but nothing concrete) I am guessing (you dont need to confirm I am just speaking out loud) that the ACC is the conference that went ahead against medical advice. The outbreaks at multiple colleges in North Carolina should have been enough to shut everything down.
Good thing this is all behind us. #RNC #GOPIsGonnaKillUsAll
FadeToBlack&Gold
Microlot Marxist
Pelosi's next press conference should be a loop of all the trouble Trump has had with ramps and steps.
rufus
rock and roller
Speaking of which, they had the gangway to the USS North Carolina canopied off for Dumpie's visit yesterday, so no one could see him going up and down the ramp.
The MN summer apocalypse that never came… (and it wasn't because of masks, see above)
29,000 dead… 1,800 actual
Every single hospital bed filled… 3% actual
3,600 ventilators… 200 actual
$6M warehouse to store bodies… empty And recently,
MN officials announced a "crack down" on covid rule violators.
29,000 dead… 1,800 actual
Every single hospital bed filled… 3% actual
3,600 ventilators… 200 actual
$6M warehouse to store bodies… empty And recently,
MN officials announced a "crack down" on covid rule violators.
leswp1
Well-known member
::bites finger and looks the other way:: There were at least 2 who went against medical advice. I think the leaks changed what they were willing to do to their athletes. They really have no conscience. They look at athletes as chattel
Handyman
Hug someone you care about...
They absolutely do...and what is sad is the parents (and the fans) treat their kids that way as well so the athletes feel their only worth is playing. I know the Big Ten is shady as hell when it comes to the crap they let their athletes get away with but at least they listen to doctors when they tell them "hey kids might get screwed up over this so lets take a step back!". Now it would also help if half the media didnt misinterpret what those doctors said (like some did with the PSU Doctor) but the ones saying "these athletes are safe let them play you bunch of *******!!" are way worse.
The funny thing is, those of us that advocate for keeping it shut down are hoping we are wrong. We would love for things to be fine and nothing bad to happen. If we are wrong we have egg on our face...if the other side is wrong people get sick and die. Logic pretty much says what should be done.
The funny thing is, those of us that advocate for keeping it shut down are hoping we are wrong. We would love for things to be fine and nothing bad to happen. If we are wrong we have egg on our face...if the other side is wrong people get sick and die. Logic pretty much says what should be done.
Very reassuring Campus Covid19 News:
ZERO reported student Covid19 hospitalizations
despite ~5K total +Covid19 rtPCR tests, “C19 cases,”
from U Alabama,
U Georgia,
U Kentucky,
Ohio State U, &
U of Dayton, through at least the end of August
Chuck Murray
WIS & Effingwoods Hockey Almanac
It's fascinating how you so-called data-driven "scientists" can't challenge Jeb's mask-usage graphs.
The collective silence is deafening, folks. Or is is "silence is violence"?!? SO confusing in the "bubble".
Oh, and this never gets old. Can't say I'm surprised to see most of you apologists holding to form ...
The collective silence is deafening, folks. Or is is "silence is violence"?!? SO confusing in the "bubble".
Oh, and this never gets old. Can't say I'm surprised to see most of you apologists holding to form ...
cF[Authentic]
southpaw
It's called ignore...
net presence
Active member
Oh......Chucky, Chucky, Chucky....although not a all surprising, your insistence on people addressing your alter-ego's mask "data" is hilarious. Especially when I've challenged you and him to answer or address other questions multiple times yet, funny, neither of you have responded yet. I'll make you a freaking deal, I'll address his "data" right now and make him (and you) look stupid (again...) but, then you have to answer the question I posed to both of you 3 days ago, along with address both of your attempts to use a Q'Anon conspiracy freak's lack of brain power in misinterpreting the CDC's info on Covid and co-morbidities to infer there's only been 6,000 actual Covid deaths out of 190,000.... Newsflash, all of the 184,000 that had co-morbidities but were also listed as Covid deaths, without contracting Covid the VAST, VAST, MAJORITY WOULD STILL BE ALIVE YOU BRAIN-DEAD TURDS....Anyways, here's the question I challenge both of you morons to answer;
You do realize that literally 98% plus of all of the scientific and medical experts with legitimately respected knowledge in relation to this virus are saying this thing is a very big deal. They're all also saying that we need to be testing in far greater daily numbers than we currently are, that there should be a national mask mandate, that another 6 week lockdown is our best bet at actually getting the virus under control, that we shouldn't be opening schools up full bore, among a number of other things.
So please explain to me why it is YOU think they are taking these more cautious positions? Do you REALLY THINK that 98% plus of the world's legitimate experts in regards to this virus are just part of the DEEP STATE and that they're willing to completely screw up the world's economies just to make sure Trump doesn't get re-elected?!? If not, please explain why all of these extremely learned people -- all of them with FAR, FAR more knowledge than you -- are taking the positions that they are?
Oh and Chuck, one other thing. Back on page 126 you tried making a point about Sturgis and the fact that there has "only" been one death attributed to having attended the rally. And, at the end you of course add "proof?" in regards to whether he actually contracted it from attending Sturgis. Couple things...One, if a reputable and respected government agency (Minnesota Department of Health) releases info that the person who died contracted it from Sturgis, the burden to "prove" they're wrong is on you. Not on us to prove they're right. We still have faith in our governmental institutions. Next, my guess is they figured out he caught it at Sturgis by doing this thing called contact tracing. Also, it's only been two weeks since Sturgis. And, since deaths usually lag infections by 4-6 weeks, we're no where close to a point where anyone with any knowledge of how Covid works can make any kind of definitive statement about how many deaths might be connected to Sturgis when all is said and done.
The answer to 1820's and your stupidity about the supposed lack of success of various mask mandates is pretty damn simple. For any mask mandate to truly be effective, at least 80-90 percent of all people need to actually wear it when they're supposed to. Unfortunately, 40 plus percent of our country have as little brains and faith in science as you two morons. So, whether it's California or Minnesota, there simply aren't enough people wearing them consistently. Although, case counts in California are now starting to fall. Which also likely indicates that it's taking a few more weeks than we though for consistent mask wearing to have an effect. As for Minnesota, I live here and, I can promise you that in almost all of the more rural areas, less than half of the population is wearing them. So, as usual, the answers to your supposed "gotcha" questions are pretty simple for those of us who can read and use basic logic.
One last thing. You two keep emphasizing the "lack" of deaths and hospitalizations, especially in relation to younger individuals, as a sign this isn't any big deal. For the thousandth time, it's not just about deaths or hospitalizations. A number of other post-infection maladies, many that can cause long-term/permanent disabilities -- in the case of myocarditis even death -- are occurring in both mildly symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. If as many as 20-40% of all those infected are coming down with one or more of these maladies -- that's between 1.2 million and 2.5 million people up to this point -- what's your response to that side of the virus. Especially considering all of the millions and millions of dollars of preventable, long-term health care costs that we'll have to deal with? Don't you think that's a pretty significant deal? Anyway, not sure why I spent all this time writing this since neither you or 1820 will probably respond.
You do realize that literally 98% plus of all of the scientific and medical experts with legitimately respected knowledge in relation to this virus are saying this thing is a very big deal. They're all also saying that we need to be testing in far greater daily numbers than we currently are, that there should be a national mask mandate, that another 6 week lockdown is our best bet at actually getting the virus under control, that we shouldn't be opening schools up full bore, among a number of other things.
So please explain to me why it is YOU think they are taking these more cautious positions? Do you REALLY THINK that 98% plus of the world's legitimate experts in regards to this virus are just part of the DEEP STATE and that they're willing to completely screw up the world's economies just to make sure Trump doesn't get re-elected?!? If not, please explain why all of these extremely learned people -- all of them with FAR, FAR more knowledge than you -- are taking the positions that they are?
Oh and Chuck, one other thing. Back on page 126 you tried making a point about Sturgis and the fact that there has "only" been one death attributed to having attended the rally. And, at the end you of course add "proof?" in regards to whether he actually contracted it from attending Sturgis. Couple things...One, if a reputable and respected government agency (Minnesota Department of Health) releases info that the person who died contracted it from Sturgis, the burden to "prove" they're wrong is on you. Not on us to prove they're right. We still have faith in our governmental institutions. Next, my guess is they figured out he caught it at Sturgis by doing this thing called contact tracing. Also, it's only been two weeks since Sturgis. And, since deaths usually lag infections by 4-6 weeks, we're no where close to a point where anyone with any knowledge of how Covid works can make any kind of definitive statement about how many deaths might be connected to Sturgis when all is said and done.
The answer to 1820's and your stupidity about the supposed lack of success of various mask mandates is pretty damn simple. For any mask mandate to truly be effective, at least 80-90 percent of all people need to actually wear it when they're supposed to. Unfortunately, 40 plus percent of our country have as little brains and faith in science as you two morons. So, whether it's California or Minnesota, there simply aren't enough people wearing them consistently. Although, case counts in California are now starting to fall. Which also likely indicates that it's taking a few more weeks than we though for consistent mask wearing to have an effect. As for Minnesota, I live here and, I can promise you that in almost all of the more rural areas, less than half of the population is wearing them. So, as usual, the answers to your supposed "gotcha" questions are pretty simple for those of us who can read and use basic logic.
One last thing. You two keep emphasizing the "lack" of deaths and hospitalizations, especially in relation to younger individuals, as a sign this isn't any big deal. For the thousandth time, it's not just about deaths or hospitalizations. A number of other post-infection maladies, many that can cause long-term/permanent disabilities -- in the case of myocarditis even death -- are occurring in both mildly symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. If as many as 20-40% of all those infected are coming down with one or more of these maladies -- that's between 1.2 million and 2.5 million people up to this point -- what's your response to that side of the virus. Especially considering all of the millions and millions of dollars of preventable, long-term health care costs that we'll have to deal with? Don't you think that's a pretty significant deal? Anyway, not sure why I spent all this time writing this since neither you or 1820 will probably respond.
If you are incapable of reading it, then who is the moron? Maybe your teacher should have been more focused on your English studies and less on indoctrination lessons.
mookie1995
there's a good buck in that racket.
Mookie was the random selection getting off the plane yesterday so go his 3rd test over the past 3 weeks.
passed again (ahhamdulah).
mookie is doing his best to drop the positive percentages
(still subjected to in home 2 week quarantine and tracking on phone)
passed again (ahhamdulah).
mookie is doing his best to drop the positive percentages
(still subjected to in home 2 week quarantine and tracking on phone)
- Status