Re: Yale - The best team in the country?
That's fairly wrong.
Because no one is agreeing with him
That's fairly wrong.
Because no one is agreeing with him
(Blaze is arguably the best bench boss in the WCHA)
I would have gone with the American Gladiator.
How did you watch them?
I see you're taking the approach of "if I intentionally disrespect them, I'll prove myself right." I love it.
You love men not logic, chief.
Here what some are skeptical... No one is saying that the Yale Bulldogs aren't good to decent team, because they are a good team that deserves to be in the top 10, but until Yale replicates a tougher schedule of a team like, DU, UND, B.C. UMD etc. ... If anything I would love to see what UMD, UND, DU or UNO could do against the schedule you played.
Your logic goes about as far as "they have a weaker strength of schedule than the other teams." You can only ride that just so far, skippy. Logic would dictate that one should look at a vast multitude of criteria before passing judgment, but I wouldn't do that if I were you, it might undermine your position.
You mean besides the fact that scoring 5 goals per game against teams that get their best players from the special Olympics? Or that a quarter inch cookie sheet has more depth than any EZAC team? "skippy" down to the dock, paddle 5 miles out to sea, and drill a hole in your canoe.
First I looked at UMD and found that while they have some good wins, they had some "non-wins" against teams whose opponents lost to Yale. UMD tied the power that is Lake St., giving up 6 goals. Lake, I saw, lost to Clarkson 2-1. Clarkson lost to Cornell 6-1. Yale beat Cornell 4-2. Hmmm, not sure you can say UMD is better on the basis of those scores.
Well, I thought, let's try another opponent. UMD tied Bemidji State 1-1. Bemidji lost to Northern Michigan 4 - 0. NDU lost to Bowling Green 2-1. Bowling Green lost to Rensselear 3-2. And Rensselear lost to Yale 4-2.
Whoops, something's wrong here, I said to myself.
Let's try another comparison. UMD lost to UND, which truly is a power (forget about Yale sneaking up on the unsuspecting Sioux last Spring in the playoffs. And, anyway, that was last year.) But UND lost to Maine 7-3. Maine lost to BC 4-0 and BC lost to Vermont 5-3. And Vermont lost to Yale last night 3-0.
Well, I thought, maybe DU's comparative scores hold up better. Let's see: DU lost to BC twice, tied Vermont, and lost to UMD. See above...the results against those opponents don't seem to prove the point. Wait a second, DU lost to Colorado College 9-2. Isn't that the team Yale beat 5-1 a week later? Thought so. So much for DU's comparative record.
What about UNO, I thought. Maybe UNO is demonstrably better than Yale. Let's see... UNO lost twice to powerhouse Bemidji...and Bemidji...whoops, Bemidji lost to NMU, which lost to...we know where that ends. And UNO lost to UND, and we know where that comparison ends, too.
I ran through a few more comparisons and the problem is that at this point in the season Yale has only one loss and all the rest have four or more "non-wins". If you trace through the comparisons (other than through Yale's one loss to Air Force which although not good was perhaps explainable) Yale always comes out on top. Its hard to reach any conclusion other than that Yale is correctly ranked no. 1 at this point in the season.
I am just saying that “if” Yale had played a schedule like say UND, DU, BU, ND or B.C. and had compiled a record playing those quality teams week in and week out, and not the weak sisters of the poor, I think most of us would be impressed. I think any of the aforementioned teams could rack up the goal totals like Yale has. I don’t think it’s anything special… When you team plays the toughest schedule in the NCAA to date and goes 11-5-2 then you can color me impressed.It seems alot of guys agree with the Goon. The Western teams and teams like BC, they say, are better because they play a "harder" schedule and because they've always been better, and they...just...are...better.
I decided to take a close look at the comparative records of UMD, UND, DU, BC and UNO and some of their opponents so far this year to test this argument and see how much better, based on common opponents, UMD, UND, DU, BC and UNO really are than Yale.
Here's what I found.
First I looked at UMD and found that while they have some good wins, they had some "non-wins" against teams whose opponents lost to Yale. UMD tied the power that is Lake St., giving up 6 goals. Lake, I saw, lost to Clarkson 2-1. Clarkson lost to Cornell 6-1. Yale beat Cornell 4-2. Hmmm, not sure you can say UMD is better on the basis of those scores.
Well, I thought, let's try another opponent. UMD tied Bemidji State 1-1. Bemidji lost to Northern Michigan 4 - 0. NDU lost to Bowling Green 2-1. Bowling Green lost to Rensselear 3-2. And Rensselear lost to Yale 4-2.
Whoops, something's wrong here, I said to myself. Let's try another comparison. UMD lost to UND, which truly is a power (forget about Yale sneaking up on the unsuspecting Sioux last Spring in the playoffs. And, anyway, that was last year.) But UND lost to Maine 7-3. Maine lost to BC 4-0 and BC lost to Vermont 5-3. And Vermont lost to Yale last night 3-0.
Well, I thought, maybe DU's comparative scores hold up better. Let's see: DU lost to BC twice, tied Vermont, and lost to UMD. See above...the results against those opponents don't seem to prove the point. Wait a second, DU lost to Colorado College 9-2. Isn't that the team Yale beat 5-1 a week later? Thought so. So much for DU's comparative record.
What about UNO, I thought. Maybe UNO is demonstrably better than Yale. Let's see... UNO lost twice to powerhouse Bemidji...and Bemidji...whoops, Bemidji lost to NMU, which lost to...we know where that ends. And UNO lost to UND, and we know where that comparison ends, too.
I ran through a few more comparisons and the problem is that at this point in the season Yale has only one loss and all the rest have four or more "non-wins". If you trace through the comparisons (other than through Yale's one loss to Air Force which although not good was perhaps explainable) Yale always comes out on top. Its hard to reach any conclusion other than that Yale is correctly ranked no. 1 at this point in the season.
Now, having gone through all the above I will agree with everyone who says that December rankings prove nothing and predict nothing about where anyone ends up in April. My point is not that Yale will necessarily win anything, let alone a national championship. My point is simply that UMD, DU, UND, BC and UNO are not demonstrably better at this point in the season and Yale probably deserves the number one ranking, for whatever its worth. It certainly makes us, Yale's fans, proud of the enormous progress and increasing success the program has enjoyed over the past five years.
tUMD will play Clarkson in a few weeks. Let's take a peek then.
tUMD also BEAT Buttmidji and beat NMU. And what is NDU? Notre Dame?
Ah, you're schizophrenic. I understand now.
Ah yes, tUMD and UND split. Interesting how that's left out.
DU split with tUMD. Again, fascinating how that's left out. You know, when two good teams play each other, one of the good teams has to lose. Well, there could be two ties, I suppose, but that's still a split. Oh, wait, you don't know, because your team doesn't play any good teams!
I don't give a **** about UNO.
I love how your one loss is "explainable" but tUMD's tie against LSSU is unforgiveable. Fascinating. What are these "few more comparisons" of which you speak?
Whoa there! Mothers, don't drink alcohol when you're pregnant. You produce Eph72.
Are there any Yale fans on here that actually graduated from Yale? Because almost every Yale fan on here is acting like a ****ing moron.
RWD how dare you bring a gun to a gun fight... Er, I mean use logic in an argument.Basically when an EZAC wins an NCAA title then come talk to me.
Are there any Yale fans on here that actually graduated from Yale? Because almost every Yale fan on here is acting like a ****ing moron.
It seems alot of guys agree with the Goon. The Western teams and teams like BC, they say, are better because they play a "harder" schedule and because they've always been better, and they...just...are...better.
RWD how dare you bring a gun to a gun fight... Er, I mean use logic in an argument.Basically when an EZAC wins an NCAA title then come talk to me.
No, that's not what they say... that's just what you want to here because it's easier to tear down that straw man.
It seems alot of guys agree with the Goon. The Western teams and teams like BC, they say, are better because they play a "harder" schedule and because they've always been better, and they...just...are...better.
I decided to take a close look at the comparative records of UMD, UND, DU, BC and UNO and some of their opponents so far this year to test this argument and see how much better, based on common opponents, UMD, UND, DU, BC and UNO really are than Yale.
Here's what I found.
First I looked at UMD and found that while they have some good wins, they had some "non-wins" against teams whose opponents lost to Yale. UMD tied the power that is Lake St., giving up 6 goals. Lake, I saw, lost to Clarkson 2-1. Clarkson lost to Cornell 6-1. Yale beat Cornell 4-2. Hmmm, not sure you can say UMD is better on the basis of those scores.
Well, I thought, let's try another opponent. UMD tied Bemidji State 1-1. Bemidji lost to Northern Michigan 4 - 0. NDU lost to Bowling Green 2-1. Bowling Green lost to Rensselear 3-2. And Rensselear lost to Yale 4-2.
Whoops, something's wrong here, I said to myself. Let's try another comparison. UMD lost to UND, which truly is a power (forget about Yale sneaking up on the unsuspecting Sioux last Spring in the playoffs. And, anyway, that was last year.) But UND lost to Maine 7-3. Maine lost to BC 4-0 and BC lost to Vermont 5-3. And Vermont lost to Yale last night 3-0.
Well, I thought, maybe DU's comparative scores hold up better. Let's see: DU lost to BC twice, tied Vermont, and lost to UMD. See above...the results against those opponents don't seem to prove the point. Wait a second, DU lost to Colorado College 9-2. Isn't that the team Yale beat 5-1 a week later? Thought so. So much for DU's comparative record.
What about UNO, I thought. Maybe UNO is demonstrably better than Yale. Let's see... UNO lost twice to powerhouse Bemidji...and Bemidji...whoops, Bemidji lost to NMU, which lost to...we know where that ends. And UNO lost to UND, and we know where that comparison ends, too.
I ran through a few more comparisons and the problem is that at this point in the season Yale has only one loss and all the rest have four or more "non-wins". If you trace through the comparisons (other than through Yale's one loss to Air Force which although not good was perhaps explainable) Yale always comes out on top. Its hard to reach any conclusion other than that Yale is correctly ranked no. 1 at this point in the season.
Now, having gone through all the above I will agree with everyone who says that December rankings prove nothing and predict nothing about where anyone ends up in April. My point is not that Yale will necessarily win anything, let alone a national championship. My point is simply that UMD, DU, UND, BC and UNO are not demonstrably better at this point in the season and Yale probably deserves the number one ranking, for whatever its worth. It certainly makes us, Yale's fans, proud of the enormous progress and increasing success the program has enjoyed over the past five years.