jcarter7669
Registered User
Re: Yale - The best team in the country?
No you didn't because you didn't address my opinion. You went through a statistical analysis as to why it's ok for them to be 10-1. I don't give a rats asss if they are 10-1 or 10-3. Heck they could be 7-4 if they had played BC/BU/UMD/UND and that would be better then being 10-1 against teams that are by and large ranked under #30.
As for Crack, and the PWR ranking them number 1 despite such a poor schedule that may be due to 36% of their games are ignored since the teams suck so much that using the win would in fact lower their RPI..........Now, I'm sure a genius Cornellian could figure out that if you include those wins...thus lowering their RPI and in effect accounting for their weak schedule they would no longer be #1. Ergo, the SOS is not reflected because 4 of their 11 games are not being used. And neither will their next 2 either... Yale will be evaluated on 7 of 13 games becase their schedule is so weak that the wins lower their score.... By the time Tourney time rolls around they won't even have the requiste 10 games under TUC for that comparison to count...
So tell me again, how exactly KRach and PWR says their schedule makes them #1....by deciding to not use certain games?
Nope - I read your opinion loud and clear. I just disagree with it - and was trying to explain to you why it is perfectly reasonable to think that a team with a 10-1 record against Yale's schedule SHOULD be considered the #1 team in the country. I'm shocked - shocked! - that you're not open to considering my argument.
No you didn't because you didn't address my opinion. You went through a statistical analysis as to why it's ok for them to be 10-1. I don't give a rats asss if they are 10-1 or 10-3. Heck they could be 7-4 if they had played BC/BU/UMD/UND and that would be better then being 10-1 against teams that are by and large ranked under #30.
As for Crack, and the PWR ranking them number 1 despite such a poor schedule that may be due to 36% of their games are ignored since the teams suck so much that using the win would in fact lower their RPI..........Now, I'm sure a genius Cornellian could figure out that if you include those wins...thus lowering their RPI and in effect accounting for their weak schedule they would no longer be #1. Ergo, the SOS is not reflected because 4 of their 11 games are not being used. And neither will their next 2 either... Yale will be evaluated on 7 of 13 games becase their schedule is so weak that the wins lower their score.... By the time Tourney time rolls around they won't even have the requiste 10 games under TUC for that comparison to count...
So tell me again, how exactly KRach and PWR says their schedule makes them #1....by deciding to not use certain games?