Re: Yale Hockey 2010
I was just going to leave this alone, but since you just proved my point, I have to comment one more time. You just said:
1) The committee does have leeway
2) It has been used
3) It was done for attendance reasons
4) Moving a team one seed up or down (as was the case you mentioned about AFA) "basically did nothing to 'bracket integrity'", even though they were 4 games over .500 and UAH was 6 games under .500.
So how exactly is moving Cornell from the 7 seed to the 6 seed so as to give Albany a fighting chance of drawing 5,000 people and giving Cornell a bus ride (while the team it switched with, SCSU, was getting on a plane either way) any different than what the committee did with AFA? Or does it not matter as long as we're talking "weak" CHA and AHA schools at the very bottom of the bracket?
Anyway, this was never really my point to prove. I'll leave it alone so we can get back to talking about Yale, which is more important than these symantics...
Klump is right again .... The mandates are set in stone, by and large, in the committee handbook. The committee does have leeway in certain areas, but has chosen not to use it. Except for very rare and extreme circumstances -- i.e. moving Air Force from a 16 to a 15 so that it would stay in Colorado Springs because neither Denver or CC qualified that year (and that basically did nothing to 'bracket integrity') ... the committee has not paid a snot of attention to attendance.
It doesn't mean they can't - they just haven't. And people focusing on that in the last few years have been consistently wrong in the end, and/or confused, including any bracket gurus who tried to prognosticate otherwise.
I was just going to leave this alone, but since you just proved my point, I have to comment one more time. You just said:
1) The committee does have leeway
2) It has been used
3) It was done for attendance reasons
4) Moving a team one seed up or down (as was the case you mentioned about AFA) "basically did nothing to 'bracket integrity'", even though they were 4 games over .500 and UAH was 6 games under .500.
So how exactly is moving Cornell from the 7 seed to the 6 seed so as to give Albany a fighting chance of drawing 5,000 people and giving Cornell a bus ride (while the team it switched with, SCSU, was getting on a plane either way) any different than what the committee did with AFA? Or does it not matter as long as we're talking "weak" CHA and AHA schools at the very bottom of the bracket?
Anyway, this was never really my point to prove. I'll leave it alone so we can get back to talking about Yale, which is more important than these symantics...
Last edited: