USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
World Soccer XXXI: Golden Generation?
- Thread starter Jimjamesak
- Start date
MichVandal
Well-known member
Why are so many people surprised that ESPN is basically phoning in the World Cup?
Did ANYONE expect them to actually give a crap other that their soccer show? This is a channel that covered the NBA many times over than the NHL even though they didn't show any of the NBA games until the end, and they covered (even partially) the entire Stanley Cup Playoff? This channel is a joke for real sports coverage. And it's sad that they have some better talking heads than the fox sports channels- who have the older cast offs of ESPN.
They could have made actual money by better covering the NHL, since they could have used better ratings for that. But they are so dumb that they tried to force eyeballs to a totally different channel. And their expensive NBA and NFL contracts are exactly why they are failing financially.
So I don't really understand the outrage from such a shadow of a sports channel. This is exactly what is expected.
Did ANYONE expect them to actually give a crap other that their soccer show? This is a channel that covered the NBA many times over than the NHL even though they didn't show any of the NBA games until the end, and they covered (even partially) the entire Stanley Cup Playoff? This channel is a joke for real sports coverage. And it's sad that they have some better talking heads than the fox sports channels- who have the older cast offs of ESPN.
They could have made actual money by better covering the NHL, since they could have used better ratings for that. But they are so dumb that they tried to force eyeballs to a totally different channel. And their expensive NBA and NFL contracts are exactly why they are failing financially.
So I don't really understand the outrage from such a shadow of a sports channel. This is exactly what is expected.
ticapnews
Never graduate.
Disney is trying to drive viewers to other Disney programming. That means the NBA, NFL, NHL and college sports. Disney is not in the business of informing viewers or even entertaining viewers. Disney is in the business of making money and maximizing shareholder value. Listen to one of their earnings calls. It's all "revenue" and "profit" and the only time viewers are mentioned is when the COO discusses ratings on big ticket items like the NBA Finals or the College Football championship, and how that translates to advertising dollars. All of Disney is trying to push eyeballs to D+ or ESPN+, drive people to the theme parks, cruise lines or into the wonderful world of merchandise. If you aren't on ESPN you may as well not even exist. The World Cup and the Olympics are the most obvious examples.
Fox knows this because it operates the same way when it can.
Fox knows this because it operates the same way when it can.
Jimjamesak
Already insane, UAA making it worse
That's just... no it's not.
EPL, and English soccer in general, are notoriously more physical than anywhere else. English referees also don't punish tackles that would be red cards elsewhere.
I haven't really noticed that referees having been letting more go. In fact, there's been heavy criticism about how too many fouls have been called in games. I do think there's a been a noticeable hesitation to call penalty kicks though.
