For what it's worth updated rankings after the WC puts the US at 13.
If you’re trying to rank countries by total produced and exported talent then Brazil is #1 with a bullet then a huge gulf to maybe Argentina or Germany at #2.Right but I was thinking of the total produced/exported talent. It seems possible to me to have a team that is markedly better than its components. Or worse.
I'd bet I could take a team from the pub to the World Cup and have a better showing than Qatar.I’d also bet you could take a team of Brazilians with zero caps to the World Cup and have a better showing than Qatar.
I go more with what happened in qualifying this time around and extrapolate from there. So you’d get the following teams added:It's rumored FIFA could reverse the 16 three team groups and go with 12 four team groups.
With the new FIFA rankings, if everyone made it based on rank: [TABLE="border: 1, cellpadding: 1, width: 500"]
[TR]
[TD]Pot 1[/TD]
[TD]Pot 2[/TD]
[TD]Pot 3[/TD]
[TD]Pot 4[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]USA - host[/TD]
[TD]Spain[/TD]
[TD]Korea[/TD]
[TD]Egypt[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Mexico - host[/TD]
[TD]Morocco[/TD]
[TD]Ukraine[/TD]
[TD]Mali[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Canada - host[/TD]
[TD]Switzerland[/TD]
[TD]Australia[/TD]
[TD]Ivory Coast[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Brazil[/TD]
[TD]Germany[/TD]
[TD]Wales[/TD]
[TD]Saudi Arabia[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Argentina[/TD]
[TD]Uruguay[/TD]
[TD]Tunisia[/TD]
[TD]Qatar[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]France[/TD]
[TD]Colombia[/TD]
[TD]Serbia[/TD]
[TD]Panama[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Belgium[/TD]
[TD]Denmark[/TD]
[TD]Chile[/TD]
[TD]Jamaica[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]England[/TD]
[TD]Senegal[/TD]
[TD]Costa Rica[/TD]
[TD]Iraq[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Netherlands[/TD]
[TD]Japan[/TD]
[TD]Cameroon[/TD]
[TD]UAE[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Croatia[/TD]
[TD]Peru[/TD]
[TD]Austria[/TD]
[TD]New Zealand[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Italy[/TD]
[TD]Sweden[/TD]
[TD]Nigeria[/TD]
[TD]P1 - Ecuador[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Portugal[/TD]
[TD]Iran[/TD]
[TD]Algeria[/TD]
[TD]P2 - Burkina Faso[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Then we have the two playoffs. UEFA gets no playoff spots. CONCACAF gets two. Everyone else gets one. The top two teams are seeded and then the others are randomly assigned. Not sure if they would put the CONCACAF teams in the same bracket, but I'm separating them.
Playoff 1 -
Ecuador vs El Salvador/Solomon Islands
Playoff 2 -
Burkina Faso vs Honduras/Oman
There isn't much of a drop off in the African teams until you get to Burkina Faso in the playoff. Otherwise you get the usual rotation, plus Mali finally gets in after dominating all the youth tournaments. CONCACAF gets the whole Hex in, so I there's some drop off at the end, but it's basically a copy of the fourth team that gets in most of the time anyway. The only major drop offs are the mass of Asian teams in Pot 4, plus New Zealand with Oceania finally getting an autobid.
Yeah, if you look at 2-16 or 17 the Bundesliga is fairly close and there’s a decent points difference and no outrageous goal differences and then you look at the top:Without looking it up I'd imagine average scoring in the Bundesliga is higher than in the PM, but yes there is a lot of drama removed given that one team dominates nearly year in and year out.
Without looking it up I'd imagine average scoring in the Bundesliga is higher than in the PM, but yes there is a lot of drama removed given that one team dominates nearly year in and year out.
I wonder where La Liga, Ligue 1, and the Bundesliga would be without Real/Barca/PSG/Bayern absolutely running up the score on some teams?Goals per game averages in Europe’s Big 5
- Serie A – 3.06 goals per game
- Bundesliga – 3.02 goals per game
- Ligue 1 – 2.87 goals per game
- Premier League – 2.75 goals per game
- La Liga – 2.43 goals per game
Currently spectating a weird discussion on Facebook where a friend (who has some really bad takes on soccer, like “I swallowed all the Qatari propaganda” bad takes) has asserted that Premier League is overhyped, mainly due to English language and marketing reasons, and not the most entertaining league in the world.
It’s weird because he’s both very right and very wrong at the same time.
He’s right because yeah the PL is overhyped, largely due to heavy marketing by the TV networks who spend way too much money on TV rights, the marketing by the PL and clubs themselves, and the English language factor.
He’s wrong because, well, it is the most entertaining league top to bottom. And I say that as someone who doesn’t particularly enjoy the PL.
He’s continuing the bad take train by asserting that La Liga, Ligue 1 and the Bundesliga are more entertaining. Which, La Liga and Ligue 1 are not anywhere close. The bottom of those two leagues are dreadful, particularly La Liga. The Bundesliga would be a better argument if Bayern didn’t ****ing win every time. Watching the Bundesliga is like watching WCW in the mid 90’s, the undercard stuff is fantastic and entertaining but the main event scene is boring AF because you know nobody is beating Hogan and takes up way too much time.
Nah, the Premier League is like WCW in 97-98. It’s nowhere near as good as it’s hyped up to be (PL marketing is essentially like Tony Schiavone saying “it’s the biggest night in the history of our sport!” every week) but it is still entertaining and somehow everyone is making a ton of money, even guys who haven’t been on TV in months.This is on point.
To continue the analogy though, you have guys like Haaland who, although on the "undercard" of the PL, are delivering A+++ promos in the middle, semi-prime parts of the show and are worth watching on their own just for that. Their stock is rising quickly and MAY be able to force their way into the Main Event discussion if this keeps up.