What's new
USCHO Fan Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

  • The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.

World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

  • Thread starter Thread starter Priceless
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
May you be struck dumb for even suggesting throwing a game.

Americans play to win all the time. That's why we're Americans.

Id have no problem with the US resting players or trying out new players, though. We might not throw it per se, but I don't see a reason to send a full A-team either.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

Should the US throw the game in Panama City just to keep Mexico out? ;)

No.

That being said, bring the B team not the A team and try your best to win with them. Make Panama earn it.

A tie in that game (US-Panama) would be fine (the qualifying mantra is "win at home and tie on the road").

Panama makes it into the playoff with New Zealand with two ties and a Costa Rica victory over Mexico on Oct 15. Panama probably makes it to the playoff with a win over Mexico on Oct 11, though goal differential becomes a factor in the final games.
 
Last edited:
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

Muck Fexico.

Last night I was watching the game and tweeting on my Kindle. I typed in "Muck" and it suggested "Fexico" as the next word. Sometimes I love this thing.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

May you be struck dumb for even suggesting throwing a game.

Americans play to win all the time. That's why we're Americans.

It was a joke, people. :eek:

I do agree with resting the A team and nursing any injuries, but I would prefer to win the group and keep the new winning streak intact.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

Is there zero added benefit to winning the hex as oppressed to just qualifying?
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

You get a cookie.
When are the final rankings set to determine whether we're a "C" or "D" team for drawing the pools? Or is it not done that way any more? Not that I think one result against Panama is very likely to cause us to change bands, mind you, but still...
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

When are the final rankings set to determine whether we're a "C" or "D" team for drawing the pools? Or is it not done that way any more? Not that I think one result against Panama is very likely to cause us to change bands, mind you, but still...

I'm not sure if it has ever been done this way? Generally, FIFA takes the top 7 teams (using various different methods) along with the hosts to create the first pod. After that, the pods have generally been broken up by region.

For example, say qualifications goes as follows...

UEFA - 5 in the Top 7 + 8 additional teams
CONMEBOL - 2 in the Top 7 + Brazil + 3 additional Teams
CONCACAF - 4 qualifying teams
OFC - 0 qualifying teams
CAF - 5 Qualifying Teams
AFC - 4 Qualifying Teams

Pod A: Top 7 Teams + Brazil
Pod B: CONMEBOL (3 teams) + CAF (5 teams)
Pod C: UEFA (8 teams)
Pod D: CONCACAF (4 teams) + AFC (4 teams)

Obviously, depending on the makeup of the qualifying teams, those pods could shift (and really, there is no real difference whether you are in Pod B, C, or D).

They won't rank the 32 teams by their FIFA rank* and then split them into pods accordingly. At least, they haven't in any of the past few World Cup draws.

* They will do this to determine the top 7, or at least it is presumed that they will do this to determine the top 7.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

When are the final rankings set to determine whether we're a "C" or "D" team for drawing the pools? Or is it not done that way any more? Not that I think one result against Panama is very likely to cause us to change bands, mind you, but still...

At the last 2 World Cups anyway (maybe longer than that, wasn't paying as much attn back then), they've only seeded Pool A. The remaining pools have been by geography.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

Id have no problem with the US resting players or trying out new players, though. We might not throw it per se, but I don't see a reason to send a full A-team either.

That's what games after qualification are for, after all.

I feel like even our B-team should kick the living bejeezus out of Jamaica at home, then send them on the road to gain experience in a hostile environment. But try to win. Never lay down just to get the Mexicans out of the World Cup. I hope they make the World Cup, they'd make a wonderful opponent in the Round of 16 should we advance that far.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

Is there zero added benefit to winning the hex as oppressed [sic] to just qualifying?

Not in and of itself. What you really want is to enter the World Cup in the FIFA rankings top 8, which looks out of reach for the US this cycle no matter how well we do.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

My bad - thanks for the corrections, folks. I've always heard of the "A-D" groups and assumed they were all based on rankings, to try to balance the groups. No wonder there is always at least one "group of death."
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

I'm not sure if it has ever been done this way? Generally, FIFA takes the top 7 teams (using various different methods) along with the hosts to create the first pod. After that, the pods have generally been broken up by region.

For example, say qualifications goes as follows...

UEFA - 5 in the Top 7 + 8 additional teams
CONMEBOL - 2 in the Top 7 + Brazil + 3 additional Teams
CONCACAF - 4 qualifying teams
OFC - 0 qualifying teams
CAF - 5 Qualifying Teams
AFC - 4 Qualifying Teams

Pod A: Top 7 Teams + Brazil
Pod B: CONMEBOL (3 teams) + CAF (5 teams)
Pod C: UEFA (8 teams)
Pod D: CONCACAF (4 teams) + AFC (4 teams)

Obviously, depending on the makeup of the qualifying teams, those pods could shift (and really, there is no real difference whether you are in Pod B, C, or D).

They won't rank the 32 teams by their FIFA rank* and then split them into pods accordingly. At least, they haven't in any of the past few World Cup draws.

* They will do this to determine the top 7, or at least it is presumed that they will do this to determine the top 7.

We get sort of screwed (or pay our dues for getting a relatively easy confederation to qualify out of) by being grouped with Asia recently. Other than the obvious joke of a confederation that is Oceania, AFC is the weakest link in soccer.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

Wow, I decided to check in on WC qualifying in Africa and couldn't believe it when I saw that Group A was won by Ethiopia (currently ranked 93 in the world and 25 in CAF) which were the lowest ranked team in the 4 member group along with South Africa, Botswana and Central African Republic...pretty impressive. In the other 9 groups the winner was the favorite and in 8 of the groups the runner up was from the 2nd pot (Congo was the other oddball, finishing 1 point behind Burkina Faso). The draw to determine the third round playoff pairings is Monday.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

My bad - thanks for the corrections, folks. I've always heard of the "A-D" groups and assumed they were all based on rankings, to try to balance the groups. No wonder there is always at least one "group of death."

They actually are trying to "balance" the groups, albeit in a different way: Except for UEFA, they don't want to have two teams from the same conference in the same group.
 
Re: World Soccer XXIV: The Road to Rio

We get sort of screwed (or pay our dues for getting a relatively easy confederation to qualify out of) by being grouped with Asia recently. Other than the obvious joke of a confederation that is Oceania, AFC is the weakest link in soccer.
We certainly want things to play out so we get paired with CAF or CONMEBOL for our pot. New FIFA Rankings are up today. USA is up to 13 and without taking into account any other results, if they beat Jamaica and Panama, they get to 9th...so close. Im not sure its possible for things to shift and CONCACAF end up in a pot with CONMEBOL or CAF...who knows.
 
We certainly want things to play out so we get paired with CAF or CONMEBOL for our pot. New FIFA Rankings are up today. USA is up to 13 and without taking into account any other results, if they beat Jamaica and Panama, they get to 9th...so close. Im not sure its possible for things to shift and CONCACAF end up in a pot with CONMEBOL or CAF...who knows.
Only way for things to shift is if New Zealand beat Mexico ( ;) ) in the playoff. Even then we'd still would have the same pots but New Zealand with CONCACAF.

Even then, being paired with Asia isn't bad, you avoid Japan, S. Korea, and Australia. With the rankings now, imagine a group of Germany, England, USA, and Japan, a very real possibility if we got paired with Africa in the pots. What's significant about that grouping? All 4 of those teams made the knockout round in 2010.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top