ExileOnDaytonStreet
Drunkard
They're the manifestation of what was wrong with the NASL, overpaid, bloated, and overhyped.
Well I don't want to know if MLS is any better off for taking in whatever NYCFC is a manifestation of.
They're the manifestation of what was wrong with the NASL, overpaid, bloated, and overhyped.
Why? It's another team in a 20 team league. Just a different ownership among many. If they become successful it'll be within the rules like everyone else.Well I don't want to know if MLS is any better off for taking in whatever NYCFC is a manifestation of.
Why? It's another team in a 20 team league. Just a different ownership among many. If they become successful it'll be within the rules like everyone else.
I'd say its very remote. No way you convince teams like SKC, RSL, or Columbus to give up the salary cap.On of my first thoughts on this move was that the Yankees and ManCity both play in uneven payroll leagues...I presume they foresee some eventuality that will allow them to do same here...might be remote chance but I can't see them not wishing for it.
Right. It would be a good thing for NYC to have 2 MLS squads, but the League to turn a profit, they have to at least get close to breaking even at most of their locations. If the league stacks the deck to allow a major player in a major market to go balls out in spending, the teams in KC, Columbus and others are going to have a hard time convincing their fans to show up every time they get their teeth kicked in. Attendance will go down and revenue will dry up, and then teams will start folding.I'd say its very remote. No way you convince teams like SKC, RSL, or Columbus to give up the salary cap.
I'd say its very remote. No way you convince teams like SKC, RSL, or Columbus to give up the salary cap.
Right. It would be a good thing for NYC to have 2 MLS squads, but the League to turn a profit, they have to at least get close to breaking even at most of their locations. If the league stacks the deck to allow a major player in a major market to go balls out in spending, the teams in KC, Columbus and others are going to have a hard time convincing their fans to show up every time they get their teeth kicked in. Attendance will go down and revenue will dry up, and then teams will start folding.
However, if the league was able to expand some, and absorbed some of the NASL squads with the idea of setting things up that there would be promotion/relegation between the two leagues, then maybe you might just be able to get away with loosening up the salary cap.
I would've loved to see some of the old NASL absorbed or some of the nicknames revived. The problem was that MLS didn't want anything to do with the old league due its failure, but it wasn't an important part of the American soccer past. That's why the Cosmos didn't want to part with the name because MLS wasn't going to honor it.
Are you that dull?I would've loved to see some of the old NASL absorbed or some of the nicknames revived. The problem was that MLS didn't want anything to do with the old league due its failure, but it wasn't an important part of the American soccer past. That's why the Cosmos didn't want to part with the name because MLS wasn't going to honor it.
There's a difference between going from 9 teams to 20 in two years and 10 teams to 20 in 10 years.The NASL failed, IMO, because it overexpanded. MLS needs to heed that lesson.
There's a difference between going from 9 teams to 20 in two years and 10 teams to 20 in 10 years.