Are you referring to 1982?
Bring on the Swedes!!!’
Well, that would the only one.
Again, read the earlier posts before we get into another discussion repeating everything.
All 3 or 4 of them on page 7? Yeah I read them. And using an event from 35 years ago is probably not a good gauge of whether it would be successful today or not.
It has to be near Canada. That’s the bottom line. It bombed in Boston. It bombed in Alaska.
This year isn’t working because Toronto had it two of the past three years. Remember, the last time it was in Buffalo, it was a huge success.
It has to be near Canada. That’s the bottom line. It bombed in Boston. It bombed in Alaska.
This year isn’t working because Toronto had it two of the past three years. Remember, the last time it was in Buffalo, it was a huge success.
tourney did okay in Boston because it was marketed (or lack thereof), terribly.
if marketed well, this tourney would draw well in Boston.. just my .02.
With advance marketing, the holidays, the youth / college / family hockey scene... games would draw better than Buffalo for sure; & most definitely the marquee match ups would draw well.
Maybe get some sponsors upfront & lower the ticket prices a bit... this could work well in Boston. Maybe its wishful thinking on my part.. but that's my thinking...![]()
Let's have it in Buffalo forever then! All the other cities be ****ed. Only Buffalo can successfully host and apparently only 50% of the time.Wishful thinking...
Non diehards just don’t know about this tourney.
And again, remember, it did very well in Buffalo in 2011. For some reason, people keep ignoring that fact.
...It bombed in Alaska...
Let's have it in Buffalo forever then! All the other cities be ****ed. Only Buffalo can successfully host and apparently only 50% of the time.
But you can get the Russian crowd in Alaska!!!
I am "being a dick" because you are very defensive of Buffalo and have a truckload of excuses for why the attendance isn't there this year, while at the same time criticizing Minneapolis for poor attendance in friggin 1982, and saying it wouldn't work in Boston either. Put it wherever it works. But that doesn't seem to be Buffalo this year, so I would say try some new spots.Oh, come on. Now you are just being a dick.
All I'm saying is Buffalo was not a bad choice. Circumstances this year made it a poor choice for this year. Starve the Golden Horseshoe of this tournament for a number of years, and Buffalo would be a good choice again.
But, it still needs to be near Canada. Detroit is a great option. Seattle might be. North Dakota again would be a great option. I just don't see it working in Pittsburgh (which did bid for it this year) or Tampa (which also bid for it this year). I also don't see it being a success in Boston or the Minneapolis area. Americans alone are just not going to pay the prices they are asking for when they can watch their own NHL team for similar costs. Maybe for the final two days, but that's it.
I am "being a dick" because you are very defensive of Buffalo and have a truckload of excuses for why the attendance isn't there this year, while at the same time criticizing Minneapolis for poor attendance in friggin 1982, and saying it wouldn't work in Boston either. Put it wherever it works. But that doesn't seem to be Buffalo this year, so I would say try some new spots.
And I am not familiar with the prices, but if that is a problem, then they should quit gouging people. People here in Minnesota paid through the nose for the Ryder Cup, so I think that we could fill a 19,000 seat hockey arena, at least for the games the USA is in, especially given the amount of Minnesotans on the team and how provincial we are.
The only reason I feel Boston might work is there are several smaller arenas in close proximity where games could be held so you wouldn't have these cavernous arenas with no people in them. I don't see why Canadians wouldn't make the trek here. It's not that far.