USCHO Fan Forum
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
The USCHO Fan Forum has migrated to a new plaform, xenForo. Most of the function of the forum should work in familiar ways. Please note that you can switch between light and dark modes by clicking on the gear icon in the upper right of the main menu bar. We are hoping that this new platform will prove to be faster and more reliable. Please feel free to explore its features.
World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
- Thread starter bigmrg74
- Start date
- Status
AMC
Registered User
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
Yeah. Maybe.
Unrelatedly, West Ham signs Piquionne from Lyon. With him and Barrera, are they the second highest spenders thus far besides Al-Citeh? Not that that says much, it has been incredibly quiet in the EPL.
Yeah. Maybe.
Unrelatedly, West Ham signs Piquionne from Lyon. With him and Barrera, are they the second highest spenders thus far besides Al-Citeh? Not that that says much, it has been incredibly quiet in the EPL.
Terrierbyassociation
Fight Cancer, Wherever You Find It
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
It makes more sense than suggesting something that will not happen. The player has to accept the move to LA and no player for Everton will for a player swap.
They can also throw in a friendly like ManUtd did in the transfer for Chicarito.
It makes more sense than suggesting something that will not happen. The player has to accept the move to LA and no player for Everton will for a player swap.
They can also throw in a friendly like ManUtd did in the transfer for Chicarito.
WeWantMore
New member
JF_Gophers
2147483647
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
I'ts unlikely Blackburn will be spending much if they are mid-takeover.
But it sounds like they are financially stable again as far as wages, so they shouldn't be offloading people either.
I'ts unlikely Blackburn will be spending much if they are mid-takeover.
But it sounds like they are financially stable again as far as wages, so they shouldn't be offloading people either.
jmh
win or lose, we booze
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
(Yes, I get that nobody on Everton would agree to the swap, but come on, moving to LA is the BEST thing about it.)
Oh no, I have to live in sunny southern California instead of Liverpool? That sounds awful.
(Yes, I get that nobody on Everton would agree to the swap, but come on, moving to LA is the BEST thing about it.)
jmh
win or lose, we booze
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
(Apparently I did not get the joke the first time though.
)
It does suck, but it's still a heck of a lot nicer than Liverpool.
(Apparently I did not get the joke the first time though.
)
AMC
Registered User
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
That can't be right. Tottenham hasn't bought anyone and they are marked down for 9. I forgot about Yossi to Chelsea. Javier Hernandez was that expensive?
That can't be right. Tottenham hasn't bought anyone and they are marked down for 9. I forgot about Yossi to Chelsea. Javier Hernandez was that expensive?
WeWantMore
New member
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
No, Spurs bought Sandro.
http://www.football.co.uk/tottenham_hotspur/internacional_-_tottenham_sign_sandro_rss596740.shtml
He hasn't joined the team yet, but it's an official deal.
Hernandez signed for 8 million, United also bought Smalling from Fulham for 10m.
No, Spurs bought Sandro.
http://www.football.co.uk/tottenham_hotspur/internacional_-_tottenham_sign_sandro_rss596740.shtml
He hasn't joined the team yet, but it's an official deal.
Hernandez signed for 8 million, United also bought Smalling from Fulham for 10m.
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
I am so embarrassed.
I thought this Al-Citeh you were all referring to was that team in the UAE that signed Fabio Cannavaro.
In my embarrassment, I admit that nickname is pretty funny.
One comment on Donovon. A lot of you have given a lot of good reasons for MLS to keep a hold of him, but the league's reputation is also a little at stake. If the league gets a reputation as an ownership group that is willing to hold American players back from the European dream, that could be a bad thing.
I am so embarrassed.
I thought this Al-Citeh you were all referring to was that team in the UAE that signed Fabio Cannavaro.
In my embarrassment, I admit that nickname is pretty funny.
One comment on Donovon. A lot of you have given a lot of good reasons for MLS to keep a hold of him, but the league's reputation is also a little at stake. If the league gets a reputation as an ownership group that is willing to hold American players back from the European dream, that could be a bad thing.
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
If Milner goes from Villa to ManCity they will be at the top of my most hated list.
If Milner goes from Villa to ManCity they will be at the top of my most hated list.
jmh
win or lose, we booze
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
What on earth would they need Milner for when they're already got like seventeen other guys who can play wide midfield?
Terrierbyassociation
Fight Cancer, Wherever You Find It
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
ManUtd-Celtic on ESPN2, about to start.
ManUtd-Celtic on ESPN2, about to start.
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/view/204033-milner-set-for-man-city-switch-in-next-10-days
I can't say why they want him, perhaps because it hurts Villa more than it helps ManCity. I checked with someone who has reliable info and this is not just a rumor
Milner moves into the middle a fair amount for villa, maybe they see him there
http://www.fannation.com/truth_and_rumors/view/204033-milner-set-for-man-city-switch-in-next-10-days
I can't say why they want him, perhaps because it hurts Villa more than it helps ManCity. I checked with someone who has reliable info and this is not just a rumor
Milner moves into the middle a fair amount for villa, maybe they see him there
Terrierbyassociation
Fight Cancer, Wherever You Find It
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
Berbatov had a nice goal. Now Celtic has a penalty.
Berbatov had a nice goal. Now Celtic has a penalty.
JF_Gophers
2147483647
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
Kind of a dumb play in the box to grab him.
Probably better to just let him take a try on goal in the run of play.
Kind of a dumb play in the box to grab him.
Probably better to just let him take a try on goal in the run of play.
Terrierbyassociation
Fight Cancer, Wherever You Find It
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
1-1, perfect penalty.
1-1, perfect penalty.
RicoForPresident
Registered User
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
I'm liking what I'm seeing from Celtic up front tonight. Perfect control by the new signing Ledley to earn that penalty and a perfect finish from Samaras. Zaluska had a nice save early in the second half. Hopefully tonight starts the long road to erase the pitiful Mowbray reign from my memory for good!
I'm liking what I'm seeing from Celtic up front tonight. Perfect control by the new signing Ledley to earn that penalty and a perfect finish from Samaras. Zaluska had a nice save early in the second half. Hopefully tonight starts the long road to erase the pitiful Mowbray reign from my memory for good!
WeWantMore
New member
Re: World Cup Soccer XVII: There can only be ONE!!!11!!!
I want no part of signing James Milner. I think he's vastly overvalued, and it's not worth the whining from Martin O'Neill that would come if we do sign him.
I want no part of signing James Milner. I think he's vastly overvalued, and it's not worth the whining from Martin O'Neill that would come if we do sign him.
- Status